Reputablle Naturalist Says We Should Let The Pandas Die Out. - Polidicks

Pandas having a symbiotic relationship with humans.

[QUOTE=TH89;17520994]What is...real? How do you define...real? If by real you mean what you can feel, what you can see and touch, then real is simply...electrical signals interpreted by your brain. Whoa.[/QUOTE] ergo concordantly vis a vis

Panda 1: Oh dude look she's hot. Panda 2: Don't do her she's the slut panda.

[QUOTE=BackflipHatchetAttack;17521152]Panda 1: Oh dude look she's hot. Panda 2: Don't do her she's the slut panda.[/QUOTE] Maybe they're like FPers. "I wouldn't do her. She's too plastic. And she has thighs like a cow. I only like girls that are into metal."

[QUOTE=TH89;17521207]Maybe they're like FPers. she has thighs like a cow.[/QUOTE] I wouldn't do a girl with thunder thighs. Disgusting.

[QUOTE=CanibalMonke;17521283]I wouldn't do a girl with thunder thighs. Disgusting.[/QUOTE] You're gay.

Depends on the thighs, curvy is hot. How did this go from Pandas to Matrix to Thunder Thighs?

[QUOTE=TH89;17521302]You're gay.[/QUOTE] Nah, I just don't like fat chicks.

[QUOTE=CanibalMonke;17521330]Nah, I just don't like fat chicks.[/QUOTE] You like women with the bodies of 12 year old boys?

and u like dicks

[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;17521349]You like women with the bodies of 12 year old boys?[/QUOTE] Medium women. Meat, but not too much.

[QUOTE=CanibalMonke;17521358]Medium women. Meat, but not too much.[/QUOTE] What is medium? Curvy? Skinny? Athletic?

[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;17521395]What is medium? Curvy? Skinny? Athletic?[/QUOTE] Skinny, but not twig skinny.

[QUOTE=CanibalMonke;17521330]Nah, I just don't like fat chicks.[/QUOTE] You're into chicks that look like prepubescent boys. [editline]07:38PM[/editline] [QUOTE=CanibalMonke;17521420]Skinny, but not twig skinny.[/QUOTE] No fat chicks no skinny chicks Yeah you're into dudes. Sorry bro.

Dayum!

So all of Facepunch loves fat chicks?

No, we have realistic standards and like real women.

[QUOTE=djshox;17521740]No, we have realistic standards and like real women.[/QUOTE] Because god forbid that any women in the world are skinny to a extent.

[QUOTE=CanibalMonke;17521746]Because god forbid that any women in the world are skinny to a extent.[/QUOTE] I think the type of woman you are thinking about is, "Athletic" not "Skinny."

[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;17521882]I think the type of woman you are thinking about is, "Athletic" not "Skinny."[/QUOTE] You don't need to be athletic to have an average weight to hight ratio. Which would happen to be pretty much everyone I know.

[QUOTE=Melkor;17521953]You don't need to be athletic to have an average weight to hight ratio. Which would happen to be pretty much everyone I know.[/QUOTE] Sure as hell helps, though. In the end it's all a matter of healthy eating.

[QUOTE=CanibalMonke;17521714]So all of Facepunch loves fat chicks?[/QUOTE] No it's just some of us don't complain about everything and objectify everything with a vagina. Too fat. Too skinny. Too flat chested Too plastic Thighs are too big Thighs are too skinny.

[QUOTE=RichyZ;17506457]if they die out, i'll buy a can of panda meat and horde it for 1000 years then put it on the market.[/QUOTE] You have 69 funnies from the time I saw this.

I propose that if pandas really REALLY want to survive, we kill off all but 2. One male and one female. If they can't reproduce their species is gone forever, but If they can successfully get their species going again we let them live, as they proven themselves a competent species.

[QUOTE=gamefreek76;17523367]I propose that if pandas really REALLY want to survive, we kill off all but 2. One male and one female. If they can't reproduce their species is gone forever, but If they can successfully get their species going again we let them live, as they proven themselves a competent species.[/QUOTE] Doesn't work like that. Look honey, you need more then 160 individuals to keep a viable genetic population.

[QUOTE=Lankist;17506601]Rats are a hell of a species. Look at them, they even tried to kill the entire Human race and got damn close to doing it. Rats are WAY better than pandas. I can respect the rats as a formidable opponent. Not pandas. I see a panda I'm like fuck that I can shoot it in the goddamn neck and I win. Rats have disease, I can't shoot plague. Rats win.[/QUOTE] Mosquitos on the rats had the plague, not the rats themselves.

[QUOTE=Boxeh;17523422][B]Fleas[/B] on the rats had the plague, not the rats themselves.[/QUOTE] Fixed.

[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;17523415]Doesn't work like that. Look honey, you need more then 160 individuals to keep a viable genetic population.[/QUOTE] Then they'll die forever, honey.

[QUOTE=gamefreek76;17523587]Then they'll die forever, honey.[/QUOTE] That was disappointing, dumpling.

[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;17516308]Playing God? [/QUOTE] Why not? I believe being able to play "God" is a goal that we should work towards, not something to avoid. [QUOTE=Canuhearme?;17516308] Panda's are fucking worthless, they brought this upon themselves by evolving the way they did, they are a dead-end evolutionarily. [/QUOTE] That is exactly what could make them potentially useful. They're a species that is ill suited to surviving in a changing world, a species that without our influence would likely die out as the world changes around it. It's a situation that provides some unique opportunities to test how our presence can affect natural selection. We already know that we can make a species extinct that would have continued to survive if it weren't for our interference. Having a species that would likely die out without our interference would be a opportunity to see if we can do the opposite, allow the continued survival of a species that would die out without our influence. Also, in the long term such an effort could potentially allow us to learn many things that we wouldn't be able to learn being only passive observers interfering by accident.