• Death sentence in Connecticut home invasion
    255 replies, posted
[QUOTE=SpaceGhost;34438241]and get rid of the rest instead of pussyfooting around trying to be humane for degenerate wastes.[/QUOTE] Wow. I didn't know being inhumane to murderers took a precedent over protecting the innocent from being killed by our government. There is a very good reason why "pussyfooting" exists for the death penalty. Humans make mistakes, therefore mistakes can be made when handling the death penalty. So all inmates are protected under the umbrella of due process because making a mistake has permanent consequences. In the end though even this doesn't guarantee that innocent people don't get killed in death row. The only guaranteed way to ensure that no innocents are killed by the death penalty is to abolish the death penalty. Do you really prefer to have innocent life in danger of being targeted by this system just to sate your lust for criminal blood?
[QUOTE=SpaceGhost;34438241]Then do DNA tests on all life sentence prisoners, find out which ones are innocent, and get rid of the rest instead of pussyfooting around trying to be humane for degenerate wastes. [B]No one wants people like these loose except you, and I honestly don't know why.[/B][/QUOTE] But they wouldn't be loose. And what on earth makes you think that Boxbot is the only one that is against the death penalty? Take a look at the map I posted. Most countries with clean running water have abolished capital punishment. Because [I]killing people is [B]wrong[/B] and rehabilitation [B]works.[/B][/I]
[QUOTE=Jetblack357;34418924]Good, theres no place in the world for a piece of shit who kills a woman and her children just to get some money.[/QUOTE] I guess soldiers count here too huh
[QUOTE=BrainDeath;34443208]But they wouldn't be loose. And what on earth makes you think that Boxbot is the only one that is against the death penalty? Take a look at the map I posted. Most countries with clean running water have abolished capital punishment. Because [I]killing people is [B]wrong[/B] and rehabilitation [B]works.[/B][/I][/QUOTE] Wrong? That's your opinion, you aren't right simply because you say it is wrong. Most rehabilitation for dangerous criminals does not work and they usually commit crimes again when they get out. Sorry but most sane people don't want murderers and other fucked up individuals out on the streets.
[QUOTE=SpaceGhost;34456631]Most rehabilitation for dangerous criminals does not work and they usually commit crimes again when they get out.[/QUOTE] You keep saying this but have yet to provide a citation for it. And before you jump at it, no, citing recidivism rates in the US won't prove a damn thing because the US (as well as quite a few other countries) don't have their prison systems geared towards rehabilitation. That is to say, you can't cite statistics from a system that doesn't even attempt rehabilitation of violent criminals to prove that rehabilitation of violent criminals doesn't work.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.