Testostacular! Battlefield 3 In-Game Footage - Polidicks

[img]http://sae.tweek.us/static/images/emoticons/emot-sbahj.gif[/img] that looks awesome

[QUOTE=Downsider;28388232]UE3 runs much better than Source on my PC. Source is a CPU-hog in every [B]a[/B]spect. [/editline] .[/QUOTE] exact opposite for me.

[QUOTE=BurnBlackJay;28385242]And then of course than obnoxious fucking BBZBZZZZHHBUHHH "music" shit[/QUOTE] I think that was supposed to be the Battlefield Theme done in the same style the trailers for Terminator: Salvation were done in, all radio static-y and shit. Still, looks nice, but I really want to see the dynamic destruction. Would be better if they showed off said destruction in MP so we knew it wasn't just scripted BS.

I want to play this but not the singleplayer. It didn't look that fun to me.

[QUOTE=BurnBlackJay;28388818]Solution: Stop making (generic) modern-era war FPSes if you're just gonna settle for another mediocre shooter It's been done to death in the last 5 years alone goddamn If you're a game developer and you can't bring anything new to the plate, you're doing it wrong (in my opinion)[/QUOTE] I guess DICE could just delay BF3 for another five years so they can make it more original. DICE just can't do anything right so they should just give up now.

As of now, I'm not going to be buying this. That trailer looked like a Call of Duty game with all the fun parts taken out and replaced with shitty sprint animations and a person-dragging mechanism. Seems like it's just another generic shooter in the Middle East, so excuse me for not jumping on BF3's dick just because it's BF3.

Wow so much :downs: [editline]2nd March 2011[/editline] If people think this is another mindless generic shooter, I would suggest you to step away from the FPS genre.

[QUOTE=geoface;28389053]The whole look of the gun looks fuckin stupid, everything else is pretty cool.[/QUOTE] Are you kidding? Everything about the rifle looked really nice.

One thing that bothered me about the battlefield series is that when my internet went down, and I was feeling up for battlefield, I couldn't play it. Now there's singleplayer to entertain me in these rare events. I'm not complaining. (There was singleplayer against bots but there was no feeling of progression and the AI sucked.)

Please, for the love of god, don't fuck this up. I loved Battlefield 2, and all its expansions to death. Me, my dad, an uncle, and a few of his friends would play this religiously. We would all party up and stay in a squad, riding from point to point in those jeeps and (the awesome but underrated) buggies, flying helicopters and inevitably get shot down because we all sucked at it, but we loved it nonetheless. :unsmith: So, Dice/EA, don't fuck this up. So help me god if you do, I'll see to it that everyone in the department that changes this into another MOH 2010 get their [url=http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=taint]taints[/url] kicked off.

I won't really judge until I play myself/ see a long gameplay video of a multiplayer match

[QUOTE=G71tc4;28392495]As of now, I'm not going to be buying this. That trailer looked like a Call of Duty game with all the fun parts taken out and replaced with shitty sprint animations and a person-dragging mechanism. Seems like it's just another generic shooter in the Middle East, so excuse me for not jumping on BF3's dick just because it's BF3.[/QUOTE] According to the GI article, there'll be a more settings than just the middle east. Does that help?

[QUOTE=D4RkHaZz;28380133]Looks promising, but why are they showing off singleplayer footage? Nobody gives a fuck about the singleplayer.[/QUOTE] Looks promising, them showing off single player footage is pretty bad ass. Nobody gives a fuck about D4RkHaZz. [editline]2nd March 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=G71tc4;28392495]As of now, I'm not going to be buying this. That trailer looked like a Call of Duty game with all the fun parts taken out and replaced with shitty sprint animations and a person-dragging mechanism. Seems like it's just another generic shooter in the Middle East, so excuse me for not jumping on BF3's dick just because it's BF3.[/QUOTE] All the fun parts taken out? Shitty sprint animation? Well, Look at the fact this is 1000% fucking better looking than those shitty remakes of the previous CoD. Just because its a war game, doesn't make it another Call of Duty, are you stone cold blazed, m'on? I doubt it has the same crappy leveling system and generic guns with stupid ass repaints. [IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss166/SebMcMeb123456/Creepy/sb0ht2.jpg[/IMG] You ^

Its looking good you blow through ammo fast though.

[QUOTE=Brandon;28395230]Its looking good you blow through ammo fast though.[/QUOTE] You blow through ammo fast in real life.

~so bro~

[media]http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/article/2/7/5/25275.jpg?v=1[/media] Well, i hope that BF3 isn't a generic FPS but so far it looks that way.

The blood on the screen actually looked really good in the video.

What do you expect, Battlefield with super human powers fighting in space with light sabers? Of course it would look like a generic shooter, but it won't.

I can't stop cumming from excitement.

It looks a lot less arcadey compared to the common fps.

It looks so good i'm simply gonna have to buy a whole new computer when it comes out to ge the full experience !

it looks okay I suppose.

[QUOTE=J!NX;28394631] All the fun parts taken out? Shitty sprint animation? Well, Look at the fact this is 1000% fucking better looking than those shitty remakes of the previous CoD. Just because its a war game, doesn't make it another Call of Duty, are you stone cold blazed, m'on? I doubt it has the same crappy leveling system and generic guns with stupid ass repaints. [img_thumb]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss166/SebMcMeb123456/Creepy/sb0ht2.jpg[/img_thumb] You ^[/QUOTE] How do you know it's better? Looks like "guys running around in desert aiming down ironsights to shoot slightly darker-than-sand figures" to me. Oh, and the second line doesn't even matter because I was referring to the SP campaign trailer.

[QUOTE=G71tc4;28399387]How do you know it's better? Looks like "guys running around in desert aiming down ironsights to shoot slightly darker-than-sand figures" to me. Oh, and the second line doesn't even matter because I was referring to the SP campaign trailer.[/QUOTE] Read the Game Informer article, if you can. There's a shitton of stuff that makes it different from CoD.

[QUOTE=G71tc4;28399387]How do you know it's better? Looks like "guys running around in desert aiming down ironsights to shoot slightly darker-than-sand figures" to me. Oh, and the second line doesn't even matter because I was referring to the SP campaign trailer.[/QUOTE] Because they give you what you want, ACTUAL in-game footage, not just some over-suspenseful trailer with heavy music and slow mo shots. Not to mention, it looks far more realistic than a bunch of guys running around killing eachother instantly with knives, firing off deagles and barrats like nothing. Plus, every recent cod game is just an over-hyped remake of the last one with some stupid short storyline thrown in.

Looks like every other modern warfare FPS I've ever played!!

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;28396003]The blood on the screen actually looked really good in the video.[/QUOTE] THe first blood on the screen wasn't from getting shot, but the guy infront of you.

[QUOTE=kaskade700;28404438]THe first blood on the screen wasn't from getting shot, but the guy infront of you.[/QUOTE] I doubt you'd care whose blood was it when you're inches from death.

They made that gameplay on the PC, thats a good sign :buddy: The Weapon fire was sex.