[quote]But U.K. advocacy group NSPCC (the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children) says the study is entirely misguided.
"This obscene type of material has no part to play in our society," a spokesperson for the organization told the U.K.'s Daily Mail. "Many children suffer atrocious abuse in the making of indecent images. To make it legal would suggest that inappropriate behaviour and violence towards children is acceptable. It never is and it would be quite wrong to make it legal."[/quote]
Seems like they missed the point completely.
[QUOTE=johan_sm;26511041]Actually if you think about it, children might get harmed while producing drawings.
What if artist asks child to pose as reference?
Still shouldn't make it bannable.[/QUOTE]
Well if there is an actual child involved it isn't artificial now is it
When you make a drawing you're not making a copy of what you're drawing... or are you? :v:
Still it's creepy and I doubt anyone in their right minds would let their children pose for what would later become fap material for possible pedophiles.
They could always keep tabs on people that view/download it.
[QUOTE=Flapadar;26511285]They could always keep tabs on people that view/download it.[/QUOTE]
That's a gigantic invasion of privacy and a terrible idea
[QUOTE=TheLittleBus;26506164]It's not innocent. It's illegal. The porn harms kids.[/QUOTE]
how exactly does someone viewing images/videos affect others in any way
[editline]5th December 2010[/editline]
and for the exact same reason banning artificial porn is fucking stupid to say the least.
[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;26511088]you know they dont or if they wanted a child they would look at pictures and even if they did ask a girl to do it they would explain to the mother why they are doing it and the daughter would get payed. no way hurting the little girl[/QUOTE]
Dude, that's proper fucked up.
Why the fuck should the mum decide shit?
[editline]5th December 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=DrTaxi;26511329]how exactly does someone viewing images/videos affect others in any way
[editline]5th December 2010[/editline]
and for the exact same reason banning artificial porn is fucking stupid to say the least.[/QUOTE]
I think what he means is some kid has to get put through a lot of shit for it to be made.
[img]http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/5914/82880520.gif[/img]
Look i made childporn, where can i sell this legally? Oh hang on i'm going to jail now? :O Put those handcuffs away.
[QUOTE=Brage Nyman;26511458][img_thumb]http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/5914/82880520.gif[/img_thumb]
Look i made childporn, where can i sell this legally? Oh hang on i'm going to jail now? :O Put those handcuffs away.[/QUOTE]
That looks fake. :downs:
[QUOTE=Brage Nyman;26511458][img_thumb]http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/5914/82880520.gif[/img_thumb]
Look i made childporn, where can i sell this legally? Oh hang on i'm going to jail now? :O Put those handcuffs away.[/QUOTE]
Oh god we're all going to get arrested
So: Draw a stick-figure and request be arrested for the creation and sharing of artificial child pornography.
Child Porn is wrong no matter what format you put it in.
[QUOTE=bravehat;26511412]
I think what he means is some kid has to get put through a lot of shit for it to be made.[/QUOTE]
Yes, but once it exists, no more harm is done.
Besides, I'm not sure whether they were referring to CP or drawn porn.
[QUOTE=bravehat;26511412]Dude, that's proper fucked up.
Why the fuck should the mum decide shit?
[/QUOTE]
because if they had the 5 year old choose then they would probably just say yes because they would get free candy or something
[editline]5th December 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=KnightVista;26511764]Child Porn is wrong no matter what format you put it in.[/QUOTE]
how is loli or hentia hurting anyone?
[QUOTE=Brage Nyman;26511458][img_thumb]http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/5914/82880520.gif[/img_thumb]
Look i made childporn, where can i sell this legally? Oh hang on i'm going to jail now? :O Put those handcuffs away.[/QUOTE]
At first I thought the one on the left was a lion
I'm all for full legalization of artificial kiddie porn. Abusing children is what needs to be illegal, we shouldn't be wasting resources on a moralist witchhunt against people with weird tastes in porn.
I rather much agree with KnightVista. It is wrong in so many ways. It's like making an apple pie with unripe apples, for one thing (the apples aren't ready to be used). I don't think that an artificially-simulated version of this kinda thing is exactly the right thing to do.
But here's another thought (just bare with me): if a being is fully matured in [B]mind[/B] and [B]body[/B], but is considered young in terms of [B]time[/B], what would there be concerning that? (in other words, if a clone has an adult body and an adult mind, but is actually only a week or so old, does that clone count as a child?)
It's a right melon scratcher, and can cause quite a bit of moral confusion. Anyone think they can crack this riddle? 'cause I sure can't.
Although the used car salesman has a good point as well. Everyone has weird tastes, and any who say otherwise are lying to themselves as well as others. (and that ain't right at all, man) But I think that using the unripe fruits that are children in the apple pie that is sexual activity, even if it was fabricated in an abstract environment like computer software/pen and paper, is just too weird and depraved for our kind. Hell, even the Great Old Ones themselves would shudder in revulsion at such depravity. I know that some people prefer younger people, but that can definitely go way too far.
Man, is there something in this enchilada?
why not just get porn stars that look like they're young but actually they're 20
[QUOTE=Vince323;26512144]why not just get porn stars that look like they're young but actually they're 20[/QUOTE]
We already do that.
[QUOTE=ironman17;26512097]I don't think that an artificially-simulated version of this kinda thing is exactly the right thing to do.[/quote]
Whether or not it's right isn't really an issue, whether it's wrong in some way or other and as a result should be made illegal or be discouraged/stigmatized is the issue. I don't think it's wrong.
[quote]It's a right melon scratcher, and can cause quite a bit of moral confusion. Anyone think they can crack this riddle? 'cause I sure can't.[/QUOTE]
Physically it's a child, mentally it's an adult. It can consent, so it should be fine. If it's a cyborg, that is, if it will never grow up and remain how it is now, it's an adult.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;26509392]I don't see why anyone would want artificial CP banned
It has no victim being exploited to produce it and if it stops even one person from raping a child it has done good
It's like banning violent video games because they have artificial murder in them[/QUOTE]
Except for the banning of huge ammounts of disturbing "cp" images, there's no legal or practical benefit from banning loli and such.
[QUOTE=Riutet;26512378]Physically it's a child, mentally it's an adult. It can consent, so it should be fine.[/QUOTE]
I didn't really mean it in that exact fashion. What I meant was; body of an adult, mind of an adult, only been alive for a matter of days/weeks.
Kinda like Leeloo from The Fifth Element; her human body was fully matured, her mind was the fully-matured mind of whatever it was recovered from the crash (whether it was the previous Fifth Element or one of the Mondoshawans), but her new body's "fabrication date" was only a few minutes after she crashed into Korben's cab. And by the end of the film, god knows how long after that was, Korben and Leeloo were refabricated (again in Leeloo's case), and probably only a minute after they were "done", they started getting freaky in the refabricator.
From what you seem to be saying, only mind and body matter; or should I say "Time is not important; only life is important"? An interesting and sensible thesis...
Sorry if I went off-topic like that, I was just using Leeloo as an example.
[QUOTE=Vince323;26512144]why not just get porn stars that look like they're young but actually they're 20[/QUOTE]
Kitty Jung. There's a reason people watch her videos.
[img_thumb]http://cdn.mademan.com/chickipedia/images/8/83/Kittyjungdj9_695.jpg[/img_thumb]
[QUOTE=bravehat;26506222]...how the fuck would that help? Pedos go for kids who haven't hit puberty yet, besides its 16 in the UK folk still molest kids and shit.[/QUOTE]
Actually, your average molester is some 18 year old chav who has sex with the 14 year old slut, then they break up and she brings it up in court to get her own back.
[QUOTE=Coffee;26512748]Actually, your average molester is some 18 year old chav who has sex with the 14 year old slut, then they break up and she brings it up in court to get her own back.[/QUOTE]
The 18 year old chav wasn't supposed to have sex with the 14 year old slut in the first place, let alone hang out with her.
[QUOTE=CAPSMAN!;26512800]The 18 year old chav wasn't supposed to have sex with the 14 year old slut in the first place, let alone hang out with her.[/QUOTE]
18 year old's shouldn't hang out with 14 year old's?
Bit Fascist there?
[QUOTE=CAPSMAN!;26512669]Kitty Jung. There's a reason people watch her videos.
[img_thumb]http://cdn.mademan.com/chickipedia/images/8/83/Kittyjungdj9_695.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
She's also a flat butterface
I don't really, you know, think that it'd do any harm, since it would help the paedophiles keep themselves check, and protect younglings from... being sexually abused/used/etc by the ones who can't control themselves.
[QUOTE=CAPSMAN!;26512800]The 18 year old chav wasn't supposed to have sex with the 14 year old slut in the first place, let alone hang out with her.[/QUOTE]
strange watching 2 of the same avatars argue. Personally i would not date someone ore then a 1 and a half younger then me but i dont see any problem with people doing it with people 4 years as long as both people had consent
I feel like it's the same person talking to himself when I look at what CAPSMAN! and Coffee's avatar.
As for the artificial child porn, what would they do to legalize it? I mean, would they make dolls? We already have drawings and there are some shows out there with lolicon in it.
Edit: Also, for those of you who don't think they can use holograms, just look at the Hatsune Miku videos on youtube...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
