• A massive and illegal geoengineering project has been detected off Canada’s west coast.
    104 replies, posted
I'm not even going to try to argue anymore at this point, its obvious that you all listen to what you have been told by the elite. But hey! On the bright side, we can all be poisoned together!
[QUOTE=GunFox;38061956][url]http://www.alibaba.com/showroom/ferrous-sulfate-price.html[/url] Not as much as you might imagine, apparently. 1) Order 100 tonnes of ferrous iron sulphate from china 2) Set delivery as middle of ocean 3) ????? 4) Profit![/QUOTE] Gee, I've always wanted 20 tons of FeSO4
[QUOTE=OvB;38062682]It's the metallic oxide salts, clearly. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c6HsiixFS8[/media][/QUOTE] Nonono don't post that shit I need my already barely sufficient IQ to get through Linear Algebra
[QUOTE=Singo;38062743]I'm not even going to try to argue anymore at this point, its obvious that you all listen to what you have been told by the elite. But hey! On the bright side, we can all be poisoned together![/QUOTE] I didn't know people who wrote science textbooks were considered elite. ARE YOU TELLING ME THE BIOGRAPHIES OF THEIR MUNDANE LIVES ARE LIES
[QUOTE=Singo;38062743]I'm not even going to try to argue anymore at this point, its obvious that you all listen to what you have been told by the elite. But hey! On the bright side, we can all be poisoned together![/QUOTE] Get off your high horse, you're not enlightened, you're not one of the few who have broken away from the herd of sheep and you're sure as shit not privy to some club of people who are somehow now past the rat race. They're vapour trails generated by the burning of jet fuel, which when under certain atmospheric conditions condense into a form of cloud. Barium is found in the soil for the simple reason that almost all the soil of the world contains Calcium and Strontium, these two elements are usually found alongside Barium and are absorbed by plants from the ground. Obviously when the plants die off any chemicals they take in are released upon decomposition, so a virus or disease in a collection of plants could cause a large amount of the chemicals to be reintroduced to the soil thus snowballing the plants in the area to suffer from soil containing too much of the chemicals causing more death and more chemical release. [quote]From various manufacturers and distributors 48 fertilizer samples were collected and analyzed for contents of barium, rubidium and strontium by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The investigated elements are almost always detectable in appreciable amounts in straight and compound fertilizers originated from natural rocks and salt deposits; whereas synthetic nitrogen fertilizers contain in every case low amounts of rubidium, no barium and appreciable quantities of strontium only in some cases.[/quote] [url]http://www.springerlink.com/content/k0h4278779840645/[/url] Your contrails are horse shit cooked up by some tin foil hat wearing schizo, deal with it.
The samples are not taken from the soil, they're taken from rainwater samples.
[QUOTE=Singo;38062743]I'm not even going to try to argue anymore at this point, its obvious that you all listen to what you have been told by the elite. But hey! On the bright side, we can all be poisoned together![/QUOTE] And remind me again how many people would need to be involved in this? The contrails are coming out of the engines. Which would mean the aircraft would have to be specifically altered in order to have valves which spray the shit into the engine exhaust or the engines themselves would need to be altered in order to facilitate proper combustion with the presence of foreign particulates suspended in the fuel. Can't imagine aluminum powder is good for turbofan engines. So it would have to be the fuel. Otherwise there would be too many tanker trucks fueling aircraft on the ground and people would notice. Plus the valves would be kinda obvious. So it would have to be introduced into the fuel and magically not chew up aircraft engines like they were a joke. Which would mean every aircraft manufacturer in existence would need to be in on it. Along with every fuel manufacturer. That puts our running total likely into the millions of people. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFYzHfjTGtk&feature=related[/media] Even these vintage aircraft enthusiasts would have to be in on it! [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfOrez6q7WM&feature=related[/media] And they would have had to start before 1944 or else they would look awful silly in this video!
Its fine you can think what you want to think, but chemtrails are much different then contrails. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kcTvqiMNl8[/media] [img]http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2425/3683405180_7911d5894e.jpg[/img] [img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GedJtba8kqw/TkdcdMwvXEI/AAAAAAAAAFs/2o4QbrbbQOw/s1600/ContrailChemtrail.jpg[/img]
So, will these plankton cause contrails?
[QUOTE=Singo;38062891]The samples are not taken from the soil, they're taken from rainwater samples.[/QUOTE] It doesn't matter, where do you think rainwater comes from and where do you think fertiliser run off from farms goes? Then there's the previously mentioned super obvious answer. The metals are being introduced by pollution from industry. Also as Gunfox mentions, the contrails are coming from the engines, so how pray tell do they feed Aluminium through the engine without literally shearing the engines apart? It would be the equivalent of flying through St. Elmos Fire or a cloud of volcanic ash every second of every flight once they reach operational altitude, and why would they be so committed to this to put jet fighters through it? Surely that would just ruin a fighters performance and thus put the lives of pilots in direct danger. [quote]Aircraft The principal damage sustained by aircraft flying into a volcanic ash cloud is abrasion to forward-facing surfaces, such as the windshield and leading edges of the wings, and accumulation of ash into surface openings, including engines. Abrasion of windshields and landing lights will reduce visibility forcing pilots to rely on their instruments. However, some instruments may provide incorrect readings as sensors (e.g. pitot tubes) can become blocked with ash. Ingestion of ash into engines causes abrasion damage to compressor fan blades. The composition of most ash is such that its melting temperature is within the operating temperature (>1000°C) of modern large jet engines.[37] The degree of impact depends upon the concentration of ash in the plume, the length of time the aircraft spends within the plume and the actions taken by the pilots. Critically, melting of ash, particularly volcanic glass, can result in accumulation of resolidified ash on turbine nozzle guide vanes, resulting in compressor stall and complete loss of engine thrust.[38] The standard procedure of the engine control system when it detects a possible stall is to increase power which would exacerbate the problem. It is recommended that pilots reduce engine power and quickly exit the cloud by performing a descending 180° turn.[38] Volcanic gases, which are present within ash clouds, can also cause damage to engines and acrylic windshields, although this damage may not surface for many years.[/quote] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_ash#Aircraft[/url] You've been horsed on every point you've put forward, give up and realise that the chemtrail conspiracy is just that, a conspiracy.
[QUOTE=Singo;38062952]Its fine you can think what you want to think, but chemtrails are much different then contrails. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kcTvqiMNl8[/media] [img]http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2425/3683405180_7911d5894e.jpg[/img] [img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GedJtba8kqw/TkdcdMwvXEI/AAAAAAAAAFs/2o4QbrbbQOw/s1600/ContrailChemtrail.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Oh look, two planes flying at different altitudes result in cloud formation that looks different. Who would have guessed?
[QUOTE=A_Pigeon;38062993]So, will these plankton cause contrails?[/QUOTE] Naw, we're just derailed completely off topic by a conspiracy theorist.
So thats why a few years back there was a metric fuckton of algae.
Any way, back to the topic at hand, you can't just dump 100 tons of shit into the ocean cause tits inevitably go up and shit inevitably goes down.
[QUOTE=Singo;38062743]I'm not even going to try to argue anymore at this point, its obvious that you all listen to what you have been told by the elite. But hey! On the bright side, we can all be poisoned together![/QUOTE] I'm guessing your fear of being poisoned is why you threw out your schizo meds.
Good thing they are attempting to fertilize the ocean,i don't care about the agenda. The stuff they use for fertilization however is not good,it will only cause even more vermin.
[QUOTE=IPK;38063287]Good thing they are attempting to fertilize the ocean,i don't care about the agenda. The stuff they use for fertilization however is not good,it will only cause even more vermin.[/QUOTE] ...what? Just in case this was a flawlessly hidden joke that I clearly didn't get, dumping fertiliser into the ocean is not a good thing.
[QUOTE=IPK;38063287]Good thing they are attempting to fertilize the ocean,i don't care about the agenda. The stuff they use for fertilization however is not good,it will only cause even more vermin.[/QUOTE] You have it completely backwards: the stuff they used is fine, the fact that they're using it to fertilize the ocean isn't. They're giving the algae enough food to make a MASSIVE bloom in the hope that it will also eat up CO2 but they're never going to give it enough food that it can stay like that forever so it'll all die out within a week and poison other sea life.
[QUOTE=koeniginator;38059229]it's scientifically undetermined if it helps or hurts more you shouldn't go dump 100 tonnes of something into the water until you're pretty damn sure of what's gonna happen[/QUOTE] Well we'll soon figure out what the end result is. Heres hoping its good.
This is super freaky for me to read because I was studying this exact thing for a Bio test last night and I was wondering if it would be a good idea to do to combat climate change. I feel like I can see the future :tinfoil:. Specifically it was about the ability of diatoms to keep their carbon when they die.
this thread went off the rails, off a cliff and into a swamp and only know is it being lifted out by ferrous iron sulphate cranes piloted by plankton from the UN
Lets get this thread ba-c-on-trail
It's because Singo derailed it with his chemtrail bullshit. We were having a good discussion on the effects of algae population booms, but I think we've discussed it enough now.
How about we dump this Russ George in west Canadian waters and see how he likes it? If he wants his damn lucrative carbon credits, let him have them; his body can be the first one.
[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;38060018]who gives a fuck about fish or native americans, this is about preventing climate change besides we've been dumping toxic shit all over the place for centuries but as soon as we start doing it in a controlled way to reverse the damage people are all "you am play gods!"[/QUOTE] Do you realize how fucking stupid you are making yourself sound by saying that?
[QUOTE=Chopstick;38060887]At least now we can sit back and see what happens, if it turns out more beneficial than damaging then maybe it's something to consider in the future seeing as it's already happened.[/QUOTE] Except like most business bullshit, this will be cast under the rug if it goes wrong. And nobody will learn anything. So history will be repeated I'd imagine.
[QUOTE=RichyZ;38070095]chemtrails did 9/11 also; illuminati[/QUOTE] Yes, it's finally contextually fitting to post this: [img]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/jet_fuel.png[/img]
I don't see what this guys done wrong apart from not telling the Officials. Iron fertilization will bring loads of fish back, because of the huge bloom of plankton
[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;38060018]who gives a fuck about fish or native americans, this is about preventing climate change [/QUOTE] you can't prevent climate change it's a natural process it will get warmer, then cooler, then do it all over again What we should be doing is looking at limiting pollution to a minimum so that we don't inadvertently accelerate and amplify climate change in a way that causes unnecessary damage that wouldn't have occurred naturally and dumping a bunch of shit into the ocean as an experiment isn't going to do any good [editline]17th October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=butered_toast;38072761]I don't see what this guys done wrong apart from not telling the Officials. Iron fertilization will bring loads of fish back, because of the huge bloom of plankton[/QUOTE] but you can't unnaturally accelerate the population of one organism without potentially destroying many other organisms this shit is generally in a natural balance; you add too many lions and you end up with no zebras
[QUOTE=Alxnotorious;38059143]You can't just mess with an ecosystem like this. It's not right.[/QUOTE] Um We've been doing it constantly for a long time now for no other reason than profit. This guy even if he's misguided as fuck is trying to actually help co2 levels. Why are you monkeys acting as if he's worse than all the companies that dump their waste right in? ever hear of the gyre?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.