[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;31317855]It's to further emulate structure in an actual physical form. Even when you do emulate brain structure virtually, you'll still need a myriad of processors, even for a small portion of brain power.[/QUOTE]
I don't think there is any advantage of doing it "physically".
In fact, the visualization would be worse with 1 CPU = 1 neuron.
At least with software you can create a 3d model and you can actually see these "packets".
Having 1 million CPUs will just look like a bunch of computers plugged into each other.
And you can do it on 1 CPU like I said. It'd be pretty damn slow, but you can do it. Yeah, if you're worried about time creating a cluster might be helpful.
Sarah Palin Simulator 2015
The end is nigh
[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;31316591]If you know that much about the brain, you can do it in software.
It might not be amazingly fast in software, but the whole 1 CPU = 1 nueron thing is kind of silly.[/QUOTE]
Massive Parallelism is precisely the reason organic brains are so powerful. Every neuron is like a little computer that adds up different connections and outputs a charge based on whether a threshold is reached. If you have 1,000,000 cores hooked together doing one simple task simultaneously, you'll get a lot more out of it than if you tried speeding up fewer cores.
[editline]25th July 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;31321324]I don't think there is any advantage of doing it "physically".
In fact, the visualization would be worse with 1 CPU = 1 neuron.
At least with software you can create a 3d model and you can actually see these "packets".
Having 1 million CPUs will just look like a bunch of computers plugged into each other.
And you can do it on 1 CPU like I said. It'd be pretty damn slow, but you can do it. Yeah, if you're worried about time creating a cluster might be helpful.[/QUOTE]
You don't understand, these are scientists who have been working many many years on this subject. You don't know more than them about what's best for emulation of a brain.
Are there any specific reason why the ARM architecture was used over other available architectures?
No, don't tell me because the CPU they used contains 18 cores each.
If we build a machine capable of running a perfect emulation of the human mind, [I]perfectly[/I], wouldn't this basically be a live, concious human mind?
What would distinguish it from the real thing? It would just be made of matter like us. There isn't anything ethereal or mystical about the human mind, we are just an organic computer essentially. If there was a way of telling a difference, then this obviously would be an imperfect emulation. But if it is perfect (or near perfect - i mean some human beings have a defective mind in some senses, but we don't consider them any less human), then we should class it as a live human mind in all but body.
So, if we did do this, would this machine be entitled to human rights?
[QUOTE=Kade;31322098]If we build a machine capable of running a perfect emulation of the human mind, [I]perfectly[/I], wouldn't this basically be a live, concious human mind?
What would distinguish it from the real thing? It would just be made of matter like us. There isn't anything ethereal or mystical about the human mind, we are just an organic computer essentially. If there was a way of telling a difference, then this obviously would be an imperfect emulation. But if it is perfect (or near perfect - i mean some human beings have a defective mind in some senses, but we don't consider them any less human), then we should class it as a live human mind in all but body.
So, if we did do this, would this machine be entitled to human rights?[/QUOTE]
no
And then we hit a brick wall.
I believe in the quantum mind, imo that's the only way to explain the brain fully.
[QUOTE=glitchvid;31322490]And then we hit a brick wall.
I believe in the quantum mind, imo that's the only way to explain the brain fully.[/QUOTE]
By all means please study it.
[QUOTE=Kade;31322098]If we build a machine capable of running a perfect emulation of the human mind, [I]perfectly[/I], wouldn't this basically be a live, concious human mind?
What would distinguish it from the real thing? It would just be made of matter like us. There isn't anything ethereal or mystical about the human mind, we are just an organic computer essentially. If there was a way of telling a difference, then this obviously would be an imperfect emulation. But if it is perfect (or near perfect - i mean some human beings have a defective mind in some senses, but we don't consider them any less human), then we should class it as a live human mind in all but body.
So, if we did do this, would this machine be entitled to human rights?[/QUOTE]I don't think you could make an artificial intelligence think or behave like a human, it wouldn't have hormones or base instincts in the way we do. Sure, you could make it act more human, but it's thought processes would be very different, I still believe that "human rights" should cover, although mostly the stuff of sci-fi at the moment, non-human "people".[QUOTE=glitchvid;31322490]And then we hit a brick wall.
I believe in the quantum mind, imo that's the only way to explain the brain fully.[/QUOTE]I really hope this quantum mind thing isn't what it sounds like.
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;31321874]Are there any specific reason why the ARM architecture was used over other available architectures?
No, don't tell me because the CPU they used contains 18 cores each.[/QUOTE]
Low power and cheap processors.
In few years, we can replicate the intelligence of Republicans and the Tea Party!
IM FROM MANCHESTER AND ID LIKE YOU ALL TO KNOW.
SUCK IT.
[QUOTE=glitchvid;31322490]And then we hit a brick wall.
I believe in the quantum mind, imo that's the only way to explain the brain fully.[/QUOTE]
Quantum events are averaged out and [SP]Roger Penrose is a talentless hack.[/SP][SP](I'm kidding[/SP][SP](Except not really))[/SP][SP]Made you look lol[/SP]
They'll get bored after a while and stab someone, just like the mancs do.
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;31321874]Are there any specific reason why the ARM architecture was used over other available architectures?
No, don't tell me because the CPU they used contains 18 cores each.[/QUOTE]
Gman003 would probably be the one to ask.
[QUOTE=SgtTupelo;31327550]In few years, we can replicate the intelligence of Republicans and the Tea Party![/QUOTE]
We already are.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
