Local family's emergency trip to hospital interrupted by protestors
261 replies, posted
[QUOTE=yawmwen;41497843]but i guess that isn't really structured rioting, more like revolutionary vandalism or something[/QUOTE]
I charged my mind, this sounds alot better than rioting. You guys are right, harmless illegal civil disobedience is okay but rioting is not.
[QUOTE=Iago;41497838]I don't want anybody to get hurt. It's just the unavoidable outcome. Like liberating North Korea, it's a good act that has small bad outcomes.[/QUOTE]
Oh my god, are you serious? What's so good about rioting?
In an entirely unrelated matter, how do I get nice big letters for a title? <h1> tag, right?
[QUOTE=Iago;41497838]I don't want anybody to get hurt. It's just the unavoidable outcome. Like liberating North Korea, it's a good act that has small bad outcomes.[/QUOTE]
What exactly will be liberated by rioting?
[QUOTE=Iago;41497778]Not everybody has the same morals as you.[/QUOTE]
Have your massive nipples sucked all the blood out of your brain, or something? What you're suggesting is not only extremely misguided, but [I]deeply[/I] disturbing.
[QUOTE=Kyle902;41497903]What exactly will be liberated by rioting?[/QUOTE]
Products from stores.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41496579]This thread is stupid. Calling people "traybots" is stupid. Pretending that filling up a road during a protest meant they were intentionally trying to keep people from getting to the hospital is stupid. The outcome of the Zimmerman trial has made SH really fucking stupid.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I don't care much about the trial but this traybot shit is really stupid
it makes you come off like a pompous asshole who thinks people can't have a negative opinion of the ruling at all
like the ruling is the ruling of god and no one can take a different position
[QUOTE=catbarf;41496913]Someone should go tell [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selma_to_Montgomery_marches"]the surviving Civil Rights protestors[/URL] that blocking a road is completely unacceptable.
Unless, of course, we're just saying it's extra bad because we disagree with their protest. If the article were about an NSA protest or an anti-banking protest or an anti-Obama protest I can't help but feel the reaction here would be a little different.[/QUOTE]
it wouldnt because they were about to yank her out of the car and theres a massive difference between voiding the constitution/human rights, and protesting about a court case verdict when you barely know any of the facts.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;41497840]Zimmerman will be found innocent. The good news is [sub](and I mean this in general, it is completely unrelated 100% to the statement which immediately precedes the following announcement [sub][wherein I mentioned that Zimmerman is going to be found innocent, which doesn't even matter, I don't care one or another, mind you!][/sub])[/sub] that my fellow black panthers are going to tear shit up and teach those white knight faggots [sub](again, just in general, I mean, not those specifically supporting any one cause, especially in relation to the Zimmerman trial, which I don't even know why I brought up)[/sub] a lesson [sub](but not one with any specific purpose in regards to current political events or anything relating to this thread or any comments I may have made previously, even those within this particular post)[/sub].[/QUOTE]
When I posted that, I expected most of you guys would understand but I guess I wasn't clear enough.
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;41497922]Yeah I don't care much about the trial but this traybot shit is really stupid
it makes you come off like a pompous asshole who thinks people can't have a negative opinion of the ruling at all
like the ruling is the ruling of god and no one can take a different position[/QUOTE]
There's a difference between disagreeing with the ruling and causing public disturbance because you disagree with it
[QUOTE=Thlis;41497883]Good thing it's just private property, otherwise someone is going to have to pay for the damages caused,[sub][sub] even though the public still has to pay for the damages[/sub][/sub][/QUOTE]
if i completely trash a bank, who pays for the damage?
[QUOTE=Iago;41497939]When I posted that, I expected most of you guys would understand but I guess I wasn't clear enough.[/QUOTE]
Then help us understand, oh enlightened one.
I figured out Iago's reasoning!
He wants to instigate a riot so he can sneak into a clinic and steal nipple reduction medication.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;41497890]
In an entirely unrelated matter, how do I get nice big letters for a title? <h1> tag, right?[/QUOTE]
I also still require an answer to this.
probably an insurance company, possibly the bank. either way, no person is really hurt by smashing a bank.
[QUOTE=yawmwen;41497963]probably an insurance company, possibly the bank. either way, no person is really hurt by smashing a bank.[/QUOTE]
Except for the people who's money gets taken, and by extension, the government who then has to pay for the stolen money.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;41497961]I also still require an answer to this.[/QUOTE]
Save your money.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;41497907]Have your massive nipples sucked all the blood out of your brain, or something? What you're suggesting is not only extremely misguided, but [I]deeply[/I] disturbing.[/QUOTE]
You're right, I apologize everyone for my tasteless comments.
But don't talk about my nipples bro.
[QUOTE=yawmwen;41497953]if i completely trash a bank, who pays for the damage?[/QUOTE]
gee, I don't know, who mainly pays for damage that is usually caused by riots and the such? The cities but where do those cities get the money?? The government and where does the government get the money??? the TAXPAYERS.
i'm going to assume that you're probably an angsty anarchistic teen that doesn't know what taxes are but taxes are what fund the government and what funds certain federal disaster relief organizations (this covers riots as well).
[QUOTE=Iago;41497978]You're right, I apologize everyone for my tasteless comments.
But don't talk about my nipples bro.[/QUOTE]
What how do you have black panther friends in the Netherlands?
Do you go to some black equivalent of Stormfront?
[QUOTE=RichyZ;41498003]the money is insured by the fdic, so its not really bad for the people who's money gets taken[/QUOTE]
did you read half the post and not the other half?
[QUOTE=yawmwen;41496504]it's been something used in protest since civil disobedience has been part of insurrectionary strategy. it's part of a strategy of civil disobedience which seeks change through creating inconveniences and slowdowns in every day life.
[editline]17th July 2013[/editline]
but i'm sorry people should only be allowed to protest against things they feel are unjust when it doesn't actually impact anyone's lives right?[/QUOTE]
Sometimes you need to inconvenience people to stop and make them think.
Think things such as, "When are they going to break out the water cannons and hose these fuckers off the road so I can get to work?"
[QUOTE=Kyle902;41497992]What how do you have black panther friends in the Netherlands?
Do you go to some black equivalent of Stormfront?[/QUOTE]
My flagdog got fucked up after Garry's Bday when he unbanned me.
[QUOTE=Iago;41498033]My flagdog got fucked up after Garry's Bday when he unbanned me.[/QUOTE]
Just like your freakish nipples were your friend's?
[QUOTE=Kyle902;41497973]Except for the people who's money gets taken, and by extension, the government who then has to pay for the stolen money.[/QUOTE]
money in a bank is insured, and i'm pretty sure it's insured privately. either way corporations, not people, are paying for the damages. a corporation is not a person, me hurting them can hardly be construed as violent.
[QUOTE=Kai-ryuu;41497990]gee, I don't know, who mainly pays for damage that is usually caused by riots and the such? The cities but where do those cities get the money?? The government and where does the government get the money??? the TAXPAYERS.
i'm going to assume that you're probably an angsty anarchistic teen that doesn't know what taxes are but taxes are what fund the government and what funds certain federal disaster relief organizations (this covers riots as well).[/QUOTE]
i'm pretty sure the government is under no legal obligation to provide riot relief. if you don't like paying for me breaking things i find oppressive, then maybe you should tell the government to stop paying for it.
btw i am an anarchist, and i am angsty sometimes, although i try not to mix my angst and anarchism.
[QUOTE=Iago;41498033]My flagdog got fucked up after Garry's Bday when he unbanned me.[/QUOTE]
So you aren't denying that you associate with the black KKK.
i don't get this response. let me try and get my head around this
when the majority of users here agree with a cause, they're okay with any amount of disruption and civil disobedience and violence to get the point across as protest?
but when they don't agree with the cause, blocking a road becomes an absolute travesty that can't be forgiven?
wow how hypocritical and how painfully arrogant. "hey i think your cause is dumb so therefore you're not allowed to protest about it". you sound like rich old white men gafforing at suffragettes a few hundred years ago. "how dare they put other's lives at risk for their [i]ridiculous[/i] cause!"
how many people do you think have died in egypt because they can't get to hospitals when they need to? yeh probably a fuck tonne. but it's okay because it was worth the fight for the protest, right?
protesting for trayvon martin is fucking dumb but the hypocrisy here is terrible
[QUOTE=yawmwen;41498062]money in a bank is insured, and i'm pretty sure it's insured privately. either way corporations, not people, are paying for the damages. a corporation is not a person, me hurting them can hardly be construed as violent.
i'm pretty sure the government is under no legal obligation to provide riot relief. if you don't like paying for me breaking things i find oppressive, then maybe you should tell the government to stop paying for it.
btw i am an anarchist, and i am angsty sometimes, although i try not to mix my angst and anarchism.[/QUOTE]
Money stolen from banks is insured by the government, not corporations.
[QUOTE=RichyZ;41498064]yeah destroying someones store definitely won't ruin their livelyhood or cause great emotional trauma no its fine its cool le reddit le rage against the machine[/QUOTE]
destroying a small business could certainly be violent and i have mixed feelings regarding the use of force on small businesses. however, there is very little argument to be made that it really impacts the health of anyone by destroying a large corporation.
[QUOTE=yawmwen;41498062]
i'm pretty sure the government is under no legal obligation to provide riot relief. if you don't like paying for me breaking things i find oppressive, then maybe you should tell the government to stop paying for it.
btw i am an anarchist, and i am angsty sometimes, although i try not to mix my angst and anarchism.[/QUOTE]
didn't think it was possible to have a brain aneurysm over the internet but I think I'm having one now
RIP me 2013 cause of death: Witnessing stupidity so massive it condensed and formed a black hole in my brain
[QUOTE=yawmwen;41498062] a corporation is not a person, me hurting them can hardly be construed as violent.[/QUOTE]
Okay, can I burn down your house in protest of your stupid posts?
After all, it can't be violent if I only burn down your house.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.