• Anonymous attacks Westboro Baptist Church In Response to Picket Plans.
    103 replies, posted
"We [Anonymous] just happen to be a group of people on the internet who need—just kind of an outlet to do as we wish, that we wouldn't be able to do in regular society. ...That's more or less the point of it. Do as you wish. ... There's a common phrase: 'we are doing it for the lulz.'" Keep defending them Jinx [editline]16th December 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Delta616;38856100]You keep saying that but don't provide facts to support it. Not all of Anon is that, many just want to fight for what they believe in and fight corruption. If they want to do that through Anon, they have every right to.[/QUOTE] You can fight corruption without wearing a mask from something you totally don't understand and saturating it in internet memes.
I love it when Anon takes on shitstains like this.
And "anonymous" does more harm then good, just because they speak out against things like SOPA doesn't really mean they're somehow good.
selective freedom of speech defeats the purpose of the freedom of speech and anyone who calls for it is an idiot. also stop giving the wbc attention and they'll fuck off on their own.
[QUOTE=OrionChronicles;38852621]the WBC are engaged in hate speech. That's illegal[/QUOTE] [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech#United_States](no it isn't)[/url]
under normal circumstances would I spend 50 pages arguing with people but even my bitching psychosis says "back the fuck off" when it comes to Governor Goblin he is absolutely mentally insane and literally couldn't get the point any worse than now. he actually believes anonymous is a specifical group of people, and it's just some clan name like "Dragon riders" or "Dune buggies" a bunch of kids made yes GG, some group of kids off the block on /b/ thought they'd make a codename for their group and call it anonymous and they rose larger and became bigger and bigger dicks about it. Whatever the hell you want to believe dude.
[QUOTE=J!NX;38856306]under normal circumstances would I spend 50 pages arguing with people but even my bitching psychosis says "back the fuck off" when it comes to Governor Goblin he is absolutely mentally insane and literally couldn't get the point any worse than now. he actually believes anonymous is a specifical group of people, and it's just some clan name like "Dragon riders" or "Dune buggies" a bunch of kids made[/QUOTE] Brilliant fucking arguing. I have been proven wrong by you basically repeating what I said. Anonymous is a group, a group is a collection of people. Jinx I know you have difficulty understanding VERY basic concepts of reality like not forgetting to breathe or reading letters of the alphabet, but surely, just fucking surely, you understand that a group is a specific group of people. I mean the word group is in there.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;38856337]Brilliant fucking arguing. I have been proven wrong by you basically repeating what I said. Anonymous is a group, a group is a collection of people. Jinx I know you have difficulty understanding VERY basic concepts of reality like not forgetting to breathe or reading letters of the alphabet, but surely, just fucking surely, you understand that a group is a specific group of people. I mean the word group is in there.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.thefreedictionary.com/anonymous[/url] [SUP]a·non·y·mous (-nn-ms) adj. 1. Having an unknown or unacknowledged name: an anonymous author. 2. Having an unknown or withheld authorship or agency: an anonymous letter; an anonymous phone call. 3. Having no distinctive character or recognition factor: "a very great, almost anonymous center of people who just want peace" (Alan Paton). anonymous [əˈnɒnɪməs] adj 1. from or by a person, author, etc., whose name is unknown or withheld an anonymous letter 2. having no known name 3. lacking individual characteristics; unexceptional 4. (often capital) denoting an organization which provides help to applicants who remain anonymous Alcoholics Anonymous [via Late Latin from Greek anōnumos, from an- + onoma name] anonymity [ˌænəˈnɪmɪtɪ] n anonymously adv anonymousness n[/SUP] that's all I'm saying, if you haven't figured it out now you're either trolling or ignorant. I don't even want to argue because to describe how insane you sound would get be banned for flaming. I suggest that after this post, no one else argues with this persons "grade A logic". Do not feed the troll.
Anonymous should picket WBC funerals.
[QUOTE=Delta616;38856100]You keep saying that but don't provide facts to support it. Not all of Anon is that, many just want to fight for what they believe in and fight corruption. If they want to do that through Anon, they have every right to. Especially when they fight for our everyday freedoms, like what they did against SOPA.[/QUOTE] fucking get it people. anonymous isn't a group.
[QUOTE=meppers;38853846]How about every time a westboro church member dies we picket THEIR funeral[/QUOTE] "God killed them because they love'd gay tranny butt sex"
[QUOTE=J!NX;38856352][url]http://www.thefreedictionary.com/anonymous[/url] [SUP]a·non·y·mous (-nn-ms) adj. 1. Having an unknown or unacknowledged name: an anonymous author. 2. Having an unknown or withheld authorship or agency: an anonymous letter; an anonymous phone call. 3. Having no distinctive character or recognition factor: "a very great, almost anonymous center of people who just want peace" (Alan Paton). anonymous [əˈnɒnɪməs] adj 1. from or by a person, author, etc., whose name is unknown or withheld an anonymous letter 2. having no known name 3. lacking individual characteristics; unexceptional 4. (often capital) denoting an organization which provides help to applicants who remain anonymous Alcoholics Anonymous [via Late Latin from Greek anōnumos, from an- + onoma name] anonymity [ˌænəˈnɪmɪtɪ] n anonymously adv anonymousness n[/SUP] that's all I'm saying, if you haven't figured it out now you're either trolling or ignorant. I don't even want to argue because to describe how insane you sound would get be banned for flaming. I suggest that after this post, no one else argues with this persons "grade A logic". Do not feed the troll.[/QUOTE] You really don't know what being "insane" is do you? Yeah, congratulations, you found the origin of Anonymous' name, what do you want a gold start?
It's beyond me as to why people still give the WBC attention. Surely we're all used to the fact that they're retards who just want to try and get sue money. Ignore them and they'll go away.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;38856615]You really don't know what being "insane" is do you? Yeah, congratulations, you found the origin of Anonymous' name, what do you want a gold start?[/QUOTE] you're treating anon as if it were purely one entity of collective minds, like someone would treat democrats or republicans, or the KKK as if they were all one entity of collective minds. Even the KKK has disagreements and conflicts within itself, and republicans are all not alike, just as people who are anonymous are not. there are thousands of complete, spergy, neck beard fucktards who use the "Anonymous" alias, the same ones that say "WE ARE LEGION LOLOLOLOLO LULLLZ". Just like there are shitloads of really fucking crazy democrats, republicans, jews, blacks, christians. Unlike these groups, however, anonymous does no harm but then there are plenty well intelligent people who legitamatly do good. So to say "anonymous does more harm than good" is completely stupid. It can't do harm than good, it's simply an unnamed group of random individuals with random motives for one common goal. It isn't a group like democrats, or blacks, or pot smokers. your literally generalizing an entire group of people when there isn't even a possibility that you can legitimately generalize that group, it's a group with no identifying factors that make it a group like democrats, only some blanket term to make them completely masked behind their computer screens. It makes more sense to say "all black people have huge dicks" because its at least not a random group! if you were on star trek you would be called a reverse-Vulcan because you are a being with no emotion, and make purely illogical, insane remakes without thinking it through.
Freedom of speech is a weird bird. I can't tell a coworker they have a nice ass without risking getting fired/suspended with no pay. These nut jobs get to shout "God hates fags" at the funerals of fallen soldiers and kids. Both are wrong, but only one gets you unemployment.
[QUOTE=J!NX;38858881]you're treating anon as if it were purely one entity of collective minds, like someone would treat democrats or republicans, or the KKK as if they were all one entity of collective minds.[/quote] Of course treating a group of people, no matter how tight knit, as collective to the extreme that you so unfairly present my as regarding it as, of course it's not going to work. Two people is dificult to be as collective as you describe it. But that's not my point. I'm regarding them as like-minded, to a very extreme level and I'll be honest, not as much as you think I regard it as. I was down at OWS, I saw the Guy Fawkes people down there. They mostly had a huge Ron Paul banner and a lot of 9/11 truther signs. They weren't organised with their message but they were all collectively causing problems. They were the exact stereotype you claim they're not. I've covered these events, I've seen their reactions. They're so fucking nauseatingly useless and similar. And they think they're these huge fucking socio-political super heroes. It DOES NOT change. And you can't fucking tell me just because they shut down some government websites for an hour to protest SOPA they're good. [quote]Even the KKK has disagreements and conflicts within itself, and republicans are all not alike, just as people who are anonymous are not.[/quote] And you're absolutely right that groups like the KKK aren't all together on their message - but we can agree that all of the KKK sucks. And that's exactly my fucking point. [quote]there are thousands of complete, spergy, neck beard fucktards who use the "Anonymous" alias, the same ones that say "WE ARE LEGION LOLOLOLOLO LULLLZ". Just like there are shitloads of really fucking crazy democrats, republicans, jews, blacks, christians. Unlike these groups, however, anonymous does no harm[/quote] You'd kinda have a point of their "operations" weren't so obviously relative to who their members are. That entire Scientology debacle Can you name me one individual who isn't either a spergy kid or some anti-Establishment media personality who's only famous because he attaches anonymous to everything? [quote]but then there are plenty well intelligent people who legitamatly do good.[/quote] Which is far and few between if ever. [quote]So to say "anonymous does more harm than good" is completely stupid.[/quote] Not at all. It's quite accurate. [quote]It can't do harm than good, it's simply an unnamed group of random individuals with random motives for one common goal. It isn't a group like democrats, or blacks, or pot smokers.[/quote] They organise events. Things like "project chanology" (Note: Jinx says "They have no relation to 4chan"), Or other things like that. Come on, they don't have common goals? Don't bullshit me. [quote]your literally generalizing an entire group of people when there isn't even a possibility that you can legitimately generalize that group, it's a group with no identifying factors that make it a group like democrats, only some blanket term to make them completely masked behind their computer screens. It makes more sense to say "all black people have huge dicks" because its at least not a random group![/QUOTE] Are you seriously comparing race and fucking political parties to an internet forum compiled group of losers? You are worse then the people who claim Obama the 2012 election because of Anonymous.
-snip- Accidental post
So Germany can't ban their Neo-Nazi party but we shouldn't allow stop Anon from fucking with the rights of Westboro? Right on, Facepunch.
WBC is literally Hitler.
[QUOTE=Singed;38860282]WBC is literally Hitler.[/QUOTE] The only difference between Hitler and the WBC seems to be that Hitler actually killed all the people he hated. The WBC just [I]wants[/I] them to die.
[QUOTE=J!NX;38851637]hopefully they actually do something good and solid So lets say they're going to picket your mothers funeral and scream "SHE DESERVED IT" "GOD HATES FAGS" "BURN IN HELL" even the fucking KKK and Neo Nazi's want the WBC down, on a level where they'd agree with blacks/jews when you step to that level you [I]know[/I] you fucked up. while you do have a point, moderation and some restrictions are needed. They are all lawyers, liars, and exploiters. The WBC abuses the legal system, even if it's in a legal way, they use loop holes and shit to cause [B]fraudulence[/B].[/QUOTE] and make everyone mad salty
you know why don't one of these suicidal mothafuckas just..
-snip- I can't really joke here.
or just IGNORE THE FUCK OUT OF THEM
[QUOTE=Corey_Faure;38861714]WBC Picket Schedules: Grab your paintballs and airsofts. We're going to have some fun with pink and blue ammo.[/QUOTE] Maybe if we stop interacting with them and keep our distance, they won't be able to sue and will eventually run out of money
[QUOTE=God of Ashes;38861757]or just IGNORE THE FUCK OUT OF THEM[/QUOTE] But it's more fun to imagine them covered in paint with shit-eating frowns on their faces.
[QUOTE=Obnobs;38859956]So Germany can't ban their Neo-Nazi party but we shouldn't allow stop Anon from fucking with the rights of Westboro? Right on, Facepunch.[/QUOTE] Nah actually I agree since the Neo-Nazis are a hate group too.
[QUOTE=Corey_Faure;38861772]But it's more fun to imagine them covered in paint with shit-eating frowns on their faces.[/QUOTE] Better to imagine them in a shallow grave. Then again, I'm a sociopath so that's just me.
[QUOTE=Joekirk;38861965]Better to imagine them in a shallow grave. Then again, I'm a sociopath so that's just me.[/QUOTE] I think when they die they'll have to get cremated. So much gravestone vandalism.
Signed that so fast [editline]17th December 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Forumaster;38860425]The only difference between Hitler and the WBC seems to be that Hitler actually killed all the people he hated. The WBC just [I]wants[/I] them to die.[/QUOTE] WBC just waits for someone else to kill them, then gives God credit. What a loving wonderful God
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.