Lesbian in new york disguised herself a a guy for six months - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Mingebox;39203986]Someone stop her before she reveals our man secrets.[/QUOTE] scrub the launch

[QUOTE=LtKyle2;39204689]fuck burn the thread before the sanius squad catches wind of it[/QUOTE] These "o noes Sanius is gonna come" are way more annoying and showup more often than Sanius does.

[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;39204372]So I guess this is her then [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/nvTeu.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] That's not a Male, nor a Female. That's a guido/guidette, depending on visual appearance, even though they actually consume food and copulate like amoeba's. Not to mention they also have the general intelligence of one.

What? Why, because she put product in her hair?

Good god, she makes it seem as though men want nothing more than to mutilate women at the end.

This is what it looked like before disguising: [img]http://scrapetv.com/News/News Pages/Everyone Else/images-13/dyke-wall.jpg[/img]

[IMG]http://www.crossdressing.pl/pics/pic_norahvincent.jpg[/IMG] Still getting an uncanny feel.

[QUOTE=Hellduck;39205493]This is what it looked like before disguising: [img]http://scrapetv.com/News/News Pages/Everyone Else/images-13/dyke-wall.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Yeah, I thought that this was going to be about New Orleans of the Netherlands or something.

[QUOTE=imptastick;39204678]#biotruth refers to idiots who think all behavior is genetically/evolutionarily linked.[B] As in "girls wear pink because berries are pink, and girls picked berries"[/B] #Sociotruth refers to idiots who think all behavior is in no way affected by genetics/evolutionary history but rather all caused by society. Both sides are massively flawed; most people would agree that the answer falls somewhere in-between.[/QUOTE] Except up until not too long ago, pink was a boys colour and blue was a girls colour according to society back then. Take attraction to the opposite gender as an example, it is, at its most basic, part of our species drive for procreation, but, by and large over the years, society has defined what is attractive, which in itself has changed over the years.

Wait a minute didn't this happen ages ago? I could swear I saw a book about this in a discount book store once, and I specifically remember that bit with the bowling club from the blurb... [B]EDIT: [/B]Yeah I knew it, the article's dated Jan. 20, 2006

How can a large, water-blocking structure have a gender?

[QUOTE=RayvenQ;39206045]Except up until not too long ago, pink was a boys colour and blue was a girls colour according to society back then.[/QUOTE] ...Hence biotruthers being idiots.

[QUOTE=RayvenQ;39206045]Except up until not too long ago, pink was a boys colour and blue was a girls colour according to society back then. Take attraction to the opposite gender as an example, it is, at its most basic, part of our species drive for procreation, but, by and large over the years, society has defined what is attractive, which in itself has changed over the years.[/QUOTE] I was not agreeing with the statement about berries, I was listing it as one of the ridiculous things they sometimes say. Your statement about attraction is an excellent example why both extremes are wrong, both society and nature have shaped humanity into what it is today.

[QUOTE=imptastick;39207553]I was not agreeing with the statement about berries, I was listing it as one of the ridiculous things they sometimes say. Your statement about attraction is an excellent example why both extremes are wrong, both society and nature have shaped humanity into what it is today.[/QUOTE] Didn't mean to imply that you agreed with it, just pointing out the rather glaring error with that "fact"

When I was younger, I used to regard female culture with mystery, it was just so foreign and different to everything I had been exposed to. Not once did I even consider that females could possibly feel the same way about male culture. Once again, a thread about something that should have been obvious to me has blown my mind.

[QUOTE=overpain;39203997]It isn't It has meaning of the boyish looking woman[/QUOTE] lol you are an idiot edit: it'd be like using the word 'faggot' if it were a gay dude. rusty beat me to it while i was editing

what the fuck was with the thread title, that's akin to 'faggot in new york' if it were a man not cool

[QUOTE=Jacam12SUX;39211711]lol you are an idiot edit: it'd be like using the word 'faggot' if it were a gay dude. rusty beat me to it while i was editing[/QUOTE] Just sayin', one of my friends who's possibly the most flaming flamer that has ever flamed(I'm talking pink stockings for crying out loud), starts the skype call with "Hey faggots!" every single time :v:

that's entirely different. you're friends.

[QUOTE=Jacam12SUX;39211791]that's entirely different. you're friends.[/QUOTE] He does it everywhere :v: [editline]14th January 2013[/editline] Probably also helps that he's insanely good at judo so people using it in the "correct" way usually go flying :v:

[QUOTE=alien_guy;39205698][IMG]http://www.crossdressing.pl/pics/pic_norahvincent.jpg[/IMG] Still getting an uncanny feel.[/QUOTE] That's actually really convincing. I'm kinda curious what "Ned's" voice sounded like now in relation to her real one.

[QUOTE=Ekalektik_1;39212199]That's actually really convincing. I'm kinda curious what "Ned's" voice sounded like now in relation to her real one.[/QUOTE] Yeah, I honestly didn't realize the two pictures were the same person at first glance.

[QUOTE=rrunyan;39206074]How can a large, water-blocking structure have a gender?[/QUOTE] check your privilege human scum

[QUOTE=imptastick;39204678]#biotruth refers to idiots who think all behavior is genetically/evolutionarily linked. As in "girls wear pink because berries are pink, and girls picked berries" #Sociotruth refers to idiots who think all behavior is in no way affected by genetics/evolutionary history but rather all caused by society. Both sides are massively flawed; most people would agree that the answer falls somewhere in-between.[/QUOTE] So do I understand correctly that these are just new terms for Nurture and Nature?

Although I don't wish to imply that being a straight white male is in any way worse than any minority, I'm still glad that someone can understand how it's not all now a dance on roses. I've always felt jealous of women for their higher attraction rate meaning they don't have to be the one asking the other gender out, and for in general being able to show much more emotion without being rejected. There are many privileges to being male (as to being straight, fuck knows since I'm bisexual and hating it), but our repressed feelings are definitely one of our most painful aspects.

< wrong thread > [editline]15th January 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Simski;39228219]Although I don't wish to imply that being a straight white male is in any way worse than any minority, I'm still glad that someone can understand how it's not all now a dance on roses. I've always felt jealous of women for their higher attraction rate meaning they don't have to be the one asking the other gender out, and for in general being able to show much more emotion without being rejected. There are many privileges to being male (as to being straight, fuck knows since I'm bisexual and hating it), but our repressed feelings are definitely one of our most painful aspects.[/QUOTE] in the past a friend of mine had quite a bit of issue with the idea that because white males are "privileged", he got the idea that they're not entitled to have or complain about personal issues. it led to a lot of self-hatred and mental abuse which took a long time for him to get over. i'm not saying that white cis males are need pity over minorities, but it's not like we're -really- any different at heart. we're all human beings, if you keep talking about privilege, it just makes the divide wider and isolates and shuts off more people.