EVERYTHING IS RIGGED ; Illuminati existence confirmed - Polidicks

[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;40446775][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAXwv7j_jbY[/media][/QUOTE] Yes but my main issue, which was touched on, is that it accumulates in body by 50%/day. [url]http://www.healthychild.com/the-real-fluoridation-facts/[/url] [quote]Yes. Approximately half of each day’s fluoride intake will be retained. This is what makes it so dangerous. “The dose makes the poison.” All sides agree to the fact that healthy kidneys can eliminate only about 50% of daily fluoride intake. The rest gets stored in calcified tissues, like bones and teeth. The National Academy Of Sciences (NAS) stated in 1977 that, for the average individual, a retention of 2 mg/day would result in crippling skeletal fluorosis after 40 years. Considering the above mentioned intake level, it is likely that skeletal fluorosis already affects many millions of people in the United States.[/quote] [editline]27th April 2013[/editline] also [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fALbhMCJ7fk[/media]

[quote]The fluoridation of public water has been hailed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control as one of the top medical achievements of the 20th century.[45] It is ranked No. 9 on this list ahead of "Recognition of tobacco use as a health hazard."[46] The American Dental Association calls water fluoridation "unquestionably one of the safest and most beneficial, cost-effective public health measures for preventing, controlling, and in some cases reversing, tooth decay."[47][not in citation given] Health Canada supports fluoridation, citing a number of international scientific reviews that indicate "there is no link between any adverse health effects and exposure to fluoride in drinking water at levels that are below the maximum acceptable concentration of 1.5 mg/L."[48] The World Health Organization says fluoridation is an effective way to prevent tooth decay in poor communities. "In some developed countries, the health and economic benefits of fluoridation may be small, but particularly important in deprived areas, where water fluoridation may be a key factor in reducing inequalities in dental health."[49] A 2008 meta-analysis of published research into fluoride's effect on osteoporosis found that daily doses of up to 20 mg fluoride significantly increased bone mineral density and reduced fracture risk.[50][/quote] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_controversy#Statements_for[/url] good boy also dont bother with statements against, half of them claim that it's used to murder people or turn them into communists rest are about some technical legal crap and ethics

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40447033] rest are about some technical legal crap and ethics[/QUOTE] I know right fuck ethics

[QUOTE=zakedodead;40447102]I know right fuck ethics[/QUOTE] ethics has absolutely no bearing on the efficacy of fluoridated water

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40447119]ethics has absolutely no bearing on the efficacy of fluoridated water[/QUOTE] Efficiency > Ethics you heard it here first folks.

[QUOTE=zakedodead;40447191]Efficiency > Ethics you heard it here first folks.[/QUOTE] No dumbass. The original argument was that he claimed it causes health problems. I cited a source which said "some of these claim it kills people, and some of it claims its unethical". He is still wrong and full of shit, and doesn't have the upper hand in morals or ethics (neither do you) because his claims are full of shit. [editline]27th April 2013[/editline] Ethics literally does not come into it because we aren't arguing ethics, we are arguing if it's dangerous or not. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("flaming again" - postal))[/highlight]

i was eating gummy worms and i accidentally swallowed a piece of plastic also since when is this news the world is a very corrupt place, the only way to cleanse our souls is through a baptism of fire and nuclear wind

[QUOTE=Neat!;40448623] the world is a very corrupt place, the only way to cleanse our souls is through a baptism of fire and nuclear wind[/QUOTE] I hope this is just a metaphor

[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;40446732]USG is bigger than you think[/QUOTE] Compared to the entire population of the US, though, it could be called "small".

[QUOTE=Snord;40449229]I hope this is just a metaphor[/QUOTE] It is a very plausible prediction.

I hope this is relevant: La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo

This is what Fightclub was about, if you didn't know. Blowing up the banks. Starting from scratch.

[QUOTE=yawmwen;40446536]a small group of people have the ability to get hundreds of millions of people doing what they want in the usa. [editline]27th April 2013[/editline] (i'm talking about the us government incase you didn't catch that)[/QUOTE] Lol no. Guess who chooses these people? The millions you talk about.

i think it's important to recognize that corporate greed stems from sources other than the top echelons of these corporations. most human beings are inclined to act in self-interest, even through acts of selflessness. and since human wants are virtually unlimited, it comes as no major surprise that some people can't just have 'enough'. the same can be said for literally anyone in any echelon of society. the main distinguishing factor is that the poor are not able to amass ridiculous amounts of money, so they try to be happy with what they have. scarcity, in this case, is a primary factor in determining how a person defines 'enough'. the problem with western society is that lots of people believe that resources are virtually unlimited, and that we'll always have gooey black shit to run our cars with, and that we'll always have shiny grey shit to build our buildings and computers and space-ships with, and that our freshwater is never going to run out no matter what we do with it, and that our agricultural soil isn't going to wither into infertile desert no matter how poorly we cultivate it. and, similarly, people believe that economies can perpetually grow without limits, and that's just not true. the penultimate limit for economic growth is the amount of resources on our planet and how sustainably we use them. no matter how you flip it, free market capitalism does not sustainably manage our natural resources, because free market economics favor short-term abundance over long-term success, and the last time that the United States took that approach to agriculture, we got [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_Bowl"]one of the most horrible and painful time periods in the whole nation's history[/URL]. the only way that we can subvert humanity's constant craving for more and more personal wealth is if we can effectively explain to everyone involved that doing so will go against our own self-interest. Garrett Hardin put forth an interesting argument in the Tragedy of the Commons regarding the subject, suggesting that private land ownership and government regulation would be two ways to prevent the over-exploitation of common-pool resources. however, it's important that people be educated enough to understand the effects of certain kinds of land-use management. essentially, a person needs to be able to understand the scarcity that is actually being imposed upon them. they need to know that taking a certain selfish action is going to lead to something far worse in the long-term for them to recognize that leaving well enough alone is in their best interest.

[QUOTE=pakadots;40450040]This is what Fightclub was about, if you didn't know. Blowing up the banks. Starting from scratch.[/QUOTE] i'm pretty certain it was more about a bunch of hypocritical nihilists but okay

[QUOTE=Cone;40452796]i'm pretty certain it was more about a bunch of hypocritical nihilists but okay[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure it was about a dude going crazy but ok

[QUOTE=zakedodead;40452869]I'm pretty sure it was about a dude going crazy but ok[/QUOTE] well lets say it was a bit of both