• War Z Devs Caught Lying in Ban Appeals
    204 replies, posted
[QUOTE=UntouchedShadow;39183203]No more second chances for these douchebags now. They clearly aren't fit to be game devs.[/QUOTE] I wonder how many people think their lies are "Acceptable"
[QUOTE=RaptorBlackz;39176127]Seems like the person who made this story up confirmed it was also fake because he/she was angry that she got banned. They are unbanned now and made a response that it was all a lie. [URL="http://forums.playwarz.com/showthread.php?93704-No-genuine-ban-appeal-Hoax"]http://forums.playwarz.com/showthread.php?93704-No-genuine-ban-appeal-Hoax [/URL][/QUOTE] Haven't people tried it with a new email and got the message about being banned due to hacking though? It wouldn't surprise me if one of the devs or an admin logged into her account to post that.
[QUOTE=nightlord;39184453]Haven't people tried it with a new email and got the message about being banned due to hacking though? [/QUOTE] Have they? I haven't seen anyone post results if it was so easy to replicate.
I tried and it said they were filled with support messages.
Couldn't they get in legal trouble for the things they've done to their consumers? Honestly, they've lied on multiple instanced.
[QUOTE=nightlord;39184453]Haven't people tried it with a new email and got the message about being banned due to hacking though? It wouldn't surprise me if one of the devs or an admin logged into her account to post that.[/QUOTE] I sent them a message and I got a "this email has no account attached." They could have wised up after the post and started sending real messages though, so i'm on the fence still... [QUOTE=J!NX;39184392]I wonder how many people think their lies are "Acceptable"[/QUOTE] "But it's fun!"
[QUOTE=TheTalon;39182978]Hey, whoa there partner. I bought Unreal Tournament just for Red Orchestra DayZ is miles better, and I fucking Hate DayZ as it is right now. Once the standalone comes out, with most buildings being enterable, and the Aimbotting Wallhacks done away with in the Console version, even though I hate nothing more than a FPS on a console, It'll be golden[/QUOTE] Standalone will use steams VAC so its possible there wont be hacks.
[QUOTE=Valdread;39186472]Standalone will use steams VAC so its possible there wont be hacks.[/QUOTE] There will be, it'll just be pretty minimal and even then those people will probably be caught.
[QUOTE=Valdread;39186472]Standalone will use steams VAC so its possible there wont be hacks.[/QUOTE] I prefer reasonable admins over any Anticheat. It's not perfect, but it's usually better
[QUOTE=TheTalon;39187144]I prefer reasonable admins over any Anticheat. It's not perfect, but it's usually better[/QUOTE] The issue is that admins can not always be online or oversee all the players at all times.
Cool, now they're gonna cash out and close up shop. Then there's gonna be a million threads saying "I told you so"
[QUOTE=MaddaCheeb;39157331]This game just needs to fucking die[/QUOTE] The game's decent enough, it's just the company managing it that's gone totally fucking batshit insane.
You can't defend The WarZ The lies they come up with are like Robin Walker saying TF2 has "Dozens of Classes, Thousands of Weapons, and 20 Territorial Control Maps"
[QUOTE=ojcoolj;39192128]You can't defend The WarZ The lies they come up with are like Robin Walker saying TF2 has "Dozens of Classes, Thousands of Weapons, and 20 Territorial Control Maps"[/QUOTE] You can't defend WarZ's developers, but the game itself is... tolerable, I guess. Even if Walker bans innocent people and promises shit like an open-world vehicle mode by Tuesday, TF2 can still be fun to a lot of people, a few of who I know personally; like myself. Can we just agree that the devs should be put in jail, and that you don't have to have a mental illness to believe WarZ can be fun in circumstance?
Well their Russian website is full of the old and false information about the game.
[QUOTE=J!NX;39182479]its not that we hate it purely, its that its genuinely a gimmick game I would buy a game very quickly if it was a proper MMORPGFPS style zombie survival without pay2win and proper graphics and fixes. it looks like its in alpha but its not, which is sad. I'm sorry but, if the devs are lying like that and releasing subpar games, that's just fucking gimmicky and retarded. There's nothing wrong with liking playing the game considering how rare the type of gameplay is, but you just can't tell me its a "great/high quality game", not that you are or aren't. I honestly think that all in all paying for it is a waste of money when it could be so much bigger and better in so many ways. They're literally selling you a vacuum and claiming it can easily suck up an entire bag of chips, and then turning around and selling you one that can hardly suck up a single chip. I'm sorry but, if anyone finds that acceptable,[I] you're a giant fucking idiot. [/I]([U]I'm not saying anyone is![/U]). So I think that, in the end, calling us sperglords over our hate of this game, is stupid, and your "Lmao" is totally backwards.[/QUOTE] It is a gimmick game, but it's still on-par to DayZ. I never cared for the game earlier before, especially after the seeing the TB video on it. However, I eventually got myself to try the emulator after hearing from a friend that he enjoyed WarZ. After trying it, I found myself to enjoy it more than DayZ. My opinion of WarZ being more enjoyable seemingly can't be respected on this forum. I don't care about the devs and I don't need continual reminders of Sergey's behavior, along with rest of the crummy developers. I've already known about the controversy since it's release. People will still say WarZ is a ripoff and I would at least agree it's not the most value conscious game out there. But it's still pretty much the equivalent of purchasing Operation Arrowhead or Combined Operations solely to play Dayz, as many people buy these titles with no interest or intention of playing them. Now, if someone has the intention of playing those then it's a different argument though I've never argued against that. And yes, I believe calling people sperglords over this is justified. Nearly everyone here knows about the controversy and yet people continue to hound others who have something positive to say about the game. Some idiots are so unable to contain their hate for the game, they even have to spread false information about in an attempt to try to portray the game in an even more negative light. Others DDOS the servers, only ruining the experience for those want to play the game. Is that not behavior you'd expect from sperglords? I like WarZ, so what.
[QUOTE=Lamar;39197485]It is a gimmick game, but it's still on-par to DayZ. I never cared for the game earlier before, especially after the seeing the TB video on it. However, I eventually got myself to try the emulator after hearing from a friend that he enjoyed WarZ. After trying it, I found myself to enjoy it more than DayZ. My opinion of WarZ being more enjoyable seemingly can't be respected on this forum. I don't care about the devs and I don't need continual reminders of Sergey's behavior, along with rest of the crummy developers. I've already known about the controversy since it's release. People will still say WarZ is a ripoff and I would at least agree it's not the most value conscious game out there. But it's still pretty much the equivalent of purchasing Operation Arrowhead or Combined Operations solely to play Dayz, as many people buy these titles with no interest or intention of playing them. Now, if someone has the intention of playing those then it's a different argument though I've never argued against that. And yes, I believe calling people sperglords over this is justified. Nearly everyone here knows about the controversy and yet people continue to hound others who have something positive to say about the game. Some idiots are so unable to contain their hate for the game, they even have to spread false information about in an attempt to try to portray the game in an even more negative light. Others DDOS the servers, only ruining the experience for those want to play the game. Is that not behavior you'd expect from sperglords? I like WarZ, so what.[/QUOTE] Fair, like I said, who gives a shit if you like WarZ, as long as you aren't praising it. (As I just cannot see ones praise for a game like that, especially if many see it as being as good as Day Z, when Day Z is in alpha) DDoSing servers though is just being a gigantic sperglord faggot douche. Hating it immensely is not. Spreading bad info is good so long as accurate. CoD is fun, but it's also a huge gimmick. It's broken as fuck.
[QUOTE=Lamar;39197485]It is a gimmick game, but it's still on-par to DayZ. I never cared for the game earlier before, especially after the seeing the TB video on it. However, I eventually got myself to try the emulator after hearing from a friend that he enjoyed WarZ. After trying it, I found myself to enjoy it more than DayZ. My opinion of WarZ being more enjoyable seemingly can't be respected on this forum. I don't care about the devs and I don't need continual reminders of Sergey's behavior, along with rest of the crummy developers. I've already known about the controversy since it's release. People will still say WarZ is a ripoff and I would at least agree it's not the most value conscious game out there. But it's still pretty much the equivalent of purchasing Operation Arrowhead or Combined Operations solely to play Dayz, as many people buy these titles with no interest or intention of playing them. Now, if someone has the intention of playing those then it's a different argument though I've never argued against that. And yes, I believe calling people sperglords over this is justified. Nearly everyone here knows about the controversy and yet people continue to hound others who have something positive to say about the game. Some idiots are so unable to contain their hate for the game, they even have to spread false information about in an attempt to try to portray the game in an even more negative light. Others DDOS the servers, only ruining the experience for those want to play the game. Is that not behavior you'd expect from sperglords? I like WarZ, so what.[/QUOTE] Thank you so much for this post. WarZ itself shouldnt get such a horrible rep because of the developers. I like the game, I like it more than DayZ, and I dont like either of the Devs for both games. I also think that maybe if the Devs were not as bad as they were, the game would be far beyond DayZ instead of on-par with it. Though the community constantly bashing the game, DDOSing the servers, and making up stuff like this, slows down the process of actually making the game. If you dont like the game, dont keep bashing it. Lets see how far the game gets. If it completely goes bust, well good for you. You successfully predicted the outcome of a game that a lot of people have come to enjoy. And then, after everything is said and done, do what ever you want. Because then it wont affect anything of importance.
[QUOTE=Duplolas;39197575]Thank you so much for this post. WarZ itself shouldnt get such a horrible rep because of the developers. I like the game, I like it more than DayZ, and I dont like either of the Devs for both games. I also think that maybe if the Devs were not as bad as they were, the game would be far beyond DayZ instead of on-par with it. Though the community constantly bashing the game, DDOSing the servers, and making up stuff like this, slows down the process of actually making the game. If you dont like the game, dont keep bashing it. Lets see how far the game gets. If it completely goes bust, well good for you. You successfully predicted the outcome of a game that a lot of people have come to enjoy. And then, after everything is said and done, do what ever you want. Because then it wont affect anything of importance.[/QUOTE] I really want War Z to die, I really do, and I really think he deserves it(Nothing I can do except not buy it). I would rather have a dedicated team of devs make something much more worth a while. IMHO the devs attitudes and style really make a big difference. Even if it ends being alright I think it wouldn't last very long if the devs lie as much as they do about the gameplay. Far larger style of gameplay with many servers having different zones (5 or more zones, but varying amounts of people, with hundreds of servers possibly?), where you can connect to another server VIA a path/road there. Deeper you go the better the guns, but the harder the game. Fair FPSRPG style leveling letting you choose your path, you could be purely a TF2 style class where you're purely support, or a tank, non combat looter, or be a jack of all trades, etc. Find your friends to survive. Different rules can be applied such as Classical FPS mode where its nonregen health and 9 weapons or hardcore mode with a stalker-teir inventory system and more hardcore roleplay and survival undertones. In game economy, play to win. Possible dynamic weather system that alters itself based on the year or server settings. AKA you can play on a really hard zone on hard core with crazy rules, a very big group of people, big ass zombies, crazy spawn number for guns, and basically just have it a "who the fuck dies horribly last?", or a casual, friendly survivor game where you battle the odds. also, would be cool to have "Clear the map" gameplay where a server constantly runs a dynamic game of 25 people in a map the size of FC3, the aim of the game is to set up bases, fortify, and have NPC's take it over. NPC's can lose the bases however. Could be beaten in an hour or take weeks, even with dedication.
[QUOTE=Duplolas;39197575] WarZ itself shouldnt get such a horrible rep because of the developers. [/QUOTE] If the devs didnt fuck up PR wise the game would still be bad design wise, theres so may problems with this game that the only way to make it slightly enjoyable is if you just play it like call of duty, which is bad. It also annoys me that theres a group of modders and unknown devs that have made an warz emulator and they've already proven themselves more competent than the developers them selves.
[QUOTE=Valdread;39198081]If the devs didnt fuck up PR wise the game would still be bad design wise, theres so may problems with this game that the only way to make it slightly enjoyable is if you just play it like call of duty, which is bad. It also annoys me that theres a group of modders and unknown devs that have made an warz emulator and they've already proven themselves more competent than the developers them selves.[/QUOTE] A War Z emulator?
[QUOTE=T-Sonar.0;39199442]A War Z emulator?[/QUOTE] It's like a private WoW server. I hear the queues to be activated are really fucking long though.
[QUOTE=Valdread;39198081]If the devs didnt fuck up PR wise the game would still be bad design wise, theres so may problems with this game that the only way to make it slightly enjoyable is if you just play it like call of duty, which is bad. It also annoys me that theres a group of modders and unknown devs that have made an warz emulator and they've already proven themselves more competent than the developers them selves.[/QUOTE] It's not really an emulator. They're using the leaked source code.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.