Mother wins right to stay in UK to see the baby daughter she stabbed: Bangladeshi woman uses human r
38 replies, posted
How do you fuck up murdering a toddler.
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;43339347]The Daily Mail website does feature some stories that are verified and true so don't ban users on the premise that you don't think its a good source as that's just being an arsehole. It takes two seconds to google a news article. That's just plain laziness if you cannot be bothered to do that.[/QUOTE]
It has nothing to do with being too lazy to look up the source. Part of the rules of posting a thread here requires that you do, and (generally) requires that it be a credible source. If you don't want to do that, don't post threads here.
[quote]But the family courts gave her the right to see her daughter under tight supervision for an hour three times a year[/quote]
that's like nothing, why is everyone getting in such a twist over such a tiny little allowance of time
[QUOTE=katbug;43322323]What do you mean the section's name isn't literal.
What is this section for, then? We already have a news section.[/QUOTE]
and creationism corner is for discussing creationism?????????
[QUOTE=Swebonny;43339835]and creationism corner is for discussing creationism?????????[/QUOTE]
That's what I've been doing and no-one's been complaining.
[QUOTE=.Lain;43339811]that's like nothing, why is everyone getting in such a twist over such a tiny little allowance of time[/QUOTE]
You try and kill your child, you should lose any right to have that child see you or have contact with.
The person, no matter how much supervision they have, is potentially still a threat to the child.
[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;43340044]You try and kill your child, you should lose any right to have that child see you or have contact with.
The person, no matter how much supervision they have, is potentially still a threat to the child.[/QUOTE]
There are a lot of cases of mothers attempting to kill their child due to depression, not due to hatred of the child, or out of malice, but because the stress of childbirth and realising you have a burden now manifested in a severe depression. They go on to be fine mothers, with only a fraction of them making more attempts on the life of the child.
This isn't a totally black and white thing. Unless they can prove a mother wanted to kill the child out of sheer malice or for reasons that cannot be excused as temporary medical problems, I see no reason to separate them for the rest of their lives, once the mother is stable again she should be able to care for the child fine.
[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;43340044]You try and kill your child, you should lose any right to have that child see you or have contact with.
The person, no matter how much supervision they have, is potentially still a threat to the child.[/QUOTE]
Her plan was to kill the child and herself, because she didn't want the child to live with her husband. Sounds like there was abuse in the family.
[QUOTE]27. The sentencing judge accepted that the injunction [disallowing her to remove the baby from the UK] and the one way ticket [which her husband had purchased to send her back to Bangladesh] came out of the blue and it was a cruel act which left her no room to take advice about her situation. He accepted that the claimant was in an overpowering situation and that the events of the preceding day or the same day led to a huge emotional turmoil and said there was some evidence that she intended not only to take the life of her child but also her own life as well. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Paul McCartney;43340044]You try and kill your child, you should lose any right to have that child see you or have contact with.
The person, no matter how much supervision they have, is potentially still a threat to the child.[/QUOTE]
i prefer not to jump right in to baseless accusations towards the mother, who is to know what kind of state she was in at the time? any mother that tries to kill their child obviously has or had on going mental illnesses and should be kept under [I]extremely[/I] tight supervision around her children, i think it might be a little bit unfair to deny literally any right to see her child.
again, 3 hours under tight supervision is a seriously small threat, and we don't know how tight said supervision is at all, she might only be allowed to see or speak to her daughter.
[editline]29th December 2013[/editline]
this article is so terrible, and OP deserves the ban they got for misleading people with an incredibly terrible title.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.