• Woman leads protest march near CIA HQ and Cheney's house.
    264 replies, posted
You guys have been arguing this topic for the past couple days. Give it a rest. :smug: Especially your Trotsky... That's why Lenin and Stalin had the control.
[QUOTE=Bredirish123;19736562] Especially your Trotsky... That's why Lenin and Stalin had the control.[/QUOTE] low blow bro
[QUOTE=Bredirish123;19736562]You guys have been arguing this topic for the past couple days. Give it a rest. :smug: Especially your Trotsky... That's why Lenin and Stalin had the control.[/QUOTE] Not to go off-topic, but Trotsky was a good friend of Lenin, a very competent leader, and Lenin's right-hand man until Lenin died. He was to be the new Soviet leader at Lenin's death, but Stalin turned on him and had him exiled. Saying Trotsky was foolish and argumentative is illogical.
Every argument I've seen on this site starts out with Trotsky getting owned and then his posts just turn to complete shit. It's HILARIOUS! P.S. - Why do you keep calling people "pasty white, upper middle class?" It that supposed to be an insult of some kind? HILARIOUS I tell ya..
[QUOTE=Sharp;19738874]Every argument I've seen on this site starts out with Trotsky getting owned and then his posts just turn to complete shit. It's HILARIOUS! P.S. - Why do you keep calling people "pasty white, upper middle class?" It that supposed to be an insult of some kind? HILARIOUS I tell ya..[/QUOTE] Expert contribution mom is proud [editline]07:53AM[/editline] one sided and retarded analysis of the argument clapping my fucking hands [editline]07:55AM[/editline] when I post an article proving him wrong, and it takes him over an hour to finally read it and in turns doesn't say shit about it, pretty much going back to his original point... and you call that "getting owned" owned? how old are you? this is politics, not counter strike
LOL! No. It's not one sided because you really did get owned, but you just can't seem to accept that fact. Thanks for the applause. I'm not talking about that one article, I'm talking about you're whole argument. I'll be 22 in April. [b]Owned [/b] v. owned, 0wned, pwned, 0wn3d, pwn3d, own3d. v. tr. To be made a fool of; To make a fool of; To confound or prove wrong; embarrasing someone: Being embarrased. It's a word that doesn't just apply to "Counter-Strike." It's a word I choose to use in my vocabulary, whether or not I talk video-games or politics and despite my age. Good try though.
[QUOTE=Trotsky;19739082]Expert contribution mom is proud [editline]07:53AM[/editline] one sided and retarded analysis of the argument clapping my fucking hands [editline]07:55AM[/editline] when I post an article proving him wrong, and it takes him over an hour to finally read it and in turns doesn't say shit about it, pretty much going back to his original point... and you call that "getting owned" owned? how old are you? this is politics, not counter strike[/QUOTE] I LOL at you thinking you know anything about what you are talking about. Also, when posting, try to actually think about making a full post instead of making one point immediately and then continuing to return and add things later on multiple times.
[QUOTE=Sharp;19739123]LOL! No. It's not one sided because you really did get owned, but you just can't seem to accept that fact. Thanks for the applause. I'm not talking about that one article, I'm talking about you're whole argument. I'll be 22 in April.[/QUOTE] that drones kill civilians? you didn't READ the argument, did you? [editline]08:02AM[/editline] ALAS thy conservative hubris has shown [editline]08:02AM[/editline] (and it's adorable) [editline]08:03AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Tameric;19739131]I LOL at you thinking you know anything about what you are talking about. Also, when posting, try to actually think about making a full post instead of making one point immediately and then continuing to return and add things later on multiple times.[/QUOTE] you never answered my question a while back, how many years combat experience do you have? [editline]08:03AM[/editline] and [editline]08:03AM[/editline] that's [editline]08:04AM[/editline] how [editline]08:04AM[/editline] i [editline]08:04AM[/editline] roll [editline]08:04AM[/editline] bitch
[QUOTE=Trotsky;19739159] you never answered my question a while back, how many years combat experience do you have? [/QUOTE] I never answered it because I never said anything about the military. I wasn't even talking to you when I made my first post to which you replied with this question. The question has absolutely nothing to do with any bit of what I was talking about. It would be as if I was speaking to my friend about GPUs and then you butt in and ask how many books I've written on the subject of hydraulics.
[QUOTE=Trotsky;19739159]that drones kill civilians? you didn't READ the argument, did you? [editline]08:02AM[/editline] ALAS thy conservative hubris has shown [editline]08:02AM[/editline] (and it's adorable) [/QUOTE] HAHA. I'm not even going to respond to your choice of antics. I'll just leave it with: HAHA.
Hey Trotsky. Guess what? Your bad.
[QUOTE=Inphinitii;19744400]Hey Trotsky. Guess what? Your bad.[/QUOTE] "You're" He's going to attack that.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;19744425]"You're" He's going to attack that.[/QUOTE] I'm on a friends tiny notebook. I can barely type as it is. Let him attack me blindly, it's not like it will make him look any better. If anything, all it will do is give himself some sort of feeling of accomplishment.
[QUOTE=Inphinitii;19744487]I'm on a friends tiny notebook. I can barely type as it is. Let him attack me blindly, it's not like it will make him look any better. If anything, all it will do is give himself some sort of feeling of accomplishment.[/QUOTE] True, true.
[QUOTE=Sharp;19739228]HAHA. I'm not even going to respond to your choice of antics. I'll just leave it with: HAHA.[/QUOTE] Expert contribution, you sure showed me [editline]09:05PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;19744589]True, true.[/QUOTE] Emperor is above such things like attacking grammar. [editline]09:06PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Tameric;19739226]I never answered it because I never said anything about the military. I wasn't even talking to you when I made my first post to which you replied with this question. The question has absolutely nothing to do with any bit of what I was talking about. It would be as if I was speaking to my friend about GPUs and then you butt in and ask how many books I've written on the subject of hydraulics.[/QUOTE] we were not talking about the military? uh alright
[QUOTE=Trotsky;19746179] we were not talking about the military? uh alright[/QUOTE] No. No [B]we[/B] weren't. You see, I'm not sure if you are aware of it, but sometimes people aren't talking to you. [url]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/482200untitled.png[/url] That's the post you replied to when you asked if I had any combat training. This makes zero sense. I'm assuming you got my post mixed up with another, which is entirely understandable.
you're luzo?
[QUOTE=Gmod_Fan77;19736834]Not to go off-topic, but Trotsky was a good friend of Lenin, a very competent leader, and Lenin's right-hand man until Lenin died. He was to be the new Soviet leader at Lenin's death, but Stalin turned on him and had him exiled. Saying Trotsky was foolish and argumentative is illogical.[/QUOTE] you have no idea what you're talking about both stalin and trotsky were friends of lenin, and both were subject to extensive criticism by lenin. and trotsky was not lenin's right hand man, he did not have one. also the USSR was not a fucking monarchy, leaders don't 'choose' their successors (nor do they have the power to do so). trotsky was foolish, immediately after the end of the russian civil war he wanted to push devastated russia into a war against europe in the name of his 'permanent revolution'. when the rest of the Bolsheviks disagreed, he called them bureaucrats and declared that the USSR was a 'degenerated workers' state', when it wasn't a workers' state to begin with. trotsky was a good commander and leader, but an awful statesman. i doubt if trotsky was the leader of the USSR that the country would have made it past WW2.
Oh no they used a drone, which if it was shot down wouldn't lose any lives. The horror.
I disagree with using drones, but this bitch is retarded. [img]http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2010/01/16/PH2010011602799.jpg[/img] [editline]08:20PM[/editline] [QUOTE=7DeadlySyns;19750566]Oh no they used a drone, which if it was shot down wouldn't lose any lives. The horror.[/QUOTE] Yea because no one dies when a drone kills people
Friendly predator missile inbound! [IMG]http://www.historycommons.org/events-images/a118_predator_firing_hellfire_2050081722-16359.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Termy58;19752495]I disagree with using drones, but this bitch is retarded. [img]http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2010/01/16/PH2010011602799.jpg[/img] [editline]08:20PM[/editline] Yea because no one dies when a drone kills people[/QUOTE] The point was that it's more effective at reducing the chances of the deaths of soldiers and it reduces collateral damage.
[QUOTE=Tameric;19755855]The point was that it's more effective at reducing the chances of the deaths of soldiers and it reduces collateral damage.[/QUOTE] maybe in fairy tale land
[QUOTE=Trotsky;19755974]maybe in fairy tale land[/QUOTE] What's the name of the metal that makes up your skull again? I guess we should just go back to cluster bombing then. [editline]01:32AM[/editline] Seriously though.....how would it NOT reduce deaths of soldiers? Are they riding the missiles or something? You also cannot seem to understand that dropping a laser guided bomb right on top of the head of a group of terrorists is better than dropping five 2000lb bombs on the general location. Collateral damage is always going to exist, drones and smart bombs are designed to reduce that. It's like arguing against using a sniper rifle to kill an enemy because it could over penetrate but then supporting the alternative of mortaring the fuck out of the rough location of the target.
[QUOTE=Termy58;19752495] Yea because no one dies when a drone kills people[/QUOTE] :downs: exactly
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.