Website Social Autopsy "dedicated" to ending Online Harassment - by doxxing - Polidicks

So how long until Randi Harper gives this her official endorsement?

More cyber bullying will DEFINITELY stop ALL of the cyber bullying. Pathetic.

[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;50136936]So how long until Randi Harper gives this her official endorsement?[/QUOTE] Harper has been railing against it and trying to get them to pay her a 10k "consulting" fee.

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;50136416]Ye, I get what they're [I]trying[/I] to do. I'm just laughing at their choice of visual aids. And, really, the execution of the entire project in general.[/QUOTE] I really wish these people would go away, because I totally think that online harassment is a thing, and that online bullying is a thing, and these people make it look laughable. These people are the types that try to feel validated in their victimization at any rate as it will allow them to also be terrible in "fighting the good fight", and as such they own cyberbullying and get to define what it is. Then you get people that look at cyberbullying and think, "wow, just look away from the computer" and anyone that is dealing with serious problems on the internet (which can be made worse with internet addictions and other things) will be grouped in. It's my big issue with feminists - there's a lot of great feminists out there that are overshadowed by the vocal minority that managed the usurp the name. The exact same thing has happened with cyberbullying although at a faster rate because not a lot of people take cyberbullying seriously.

[QUOTE=smidge146;50136502]"We have secured a provisional patent for our technology." What technology? This is such a stupid idea.[/QUOTE] If they've tried to patent being a cunt online, there are decades of prior art to that one.

[QUOTE=DuCT;50137044]Harper has been railing against it and trying to get them to pay her a 10k "consulting" fee.[/QUOTE] I'm both surprised and not surprised at all.

They want to end anonymity with suggestions from anonymous people?

All this shit would do is just entrench the harassers even further into their idea that these people deserve it - in this case you really can't fight fire with fire.

[QUOTE=DuCT;50137044]Harper has been railing against it[/QUOTE] Oh wow, real- [QUOTE=DuCT;50137044]and trying to get them to[B] pay her a 10k "consulting" fee.[/B][/QUOTE] [I]Of course...[/I]

They should partner with crash override network.

Ah yes, C.O.N. Now that was a great succsess!

[QUOTE=DuCT;50137044]Harper has been railing against it and trying to get them to pay her a 10k "consulting" fee.[/QUOTE] She [url=https://medium.com/@randileeharper/an-open-letter-to-social-autopsy-ae64fccdcfe#.16ug1ykjv]wrote an open letter to them, where she flat out says they are part of the problem and calls them airheads[/url].

[QUOTE=Fangz;50139804]She [url=https://medium.com/@randileeharper/an-open-letter-to-social-autopsy-ae64fccdcfe#.16ug1ykjv]wrote an open letter to them, where she flat out says they are part of the problem and calls them airheads[/url].[/QUOTE] I'm no friend of hers, but I really find nothing about these idiots in her post that I disagree with. I think she's completely right about them.

absolute fucking bullocks this won't fucking stop cyberbulling and isn't the correct way to approach it, please tell me this is satire

[QUOTE=elixwhitetail;50140033]I'm no friend of hers, but I really find nothing about these idiots in her post that I disagree with. I think she's completely right about them.[/QUOTE] A broken clock can be right twice a day you know. I still don't think the real reason she is calling them out is stated in her open letter directly, though their back and forth with Zoe did fuel it. EDIT: Looks like Candace Owens made some drastic claims about her phone conversation with Zoe during an interview with Ralph Report: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwVONEHmAZg[/media]

This is a bit of a bump, though [URL="http://degree180.com/8686-2/"]here's Owens's piece on what she thinks happened[/URL]. [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1475810&p=50160311&viewfull=1#post50160311"]There's apparently evidence[/URL] that points towards Quinn leaking their email conversation to her followers on her private account, but it's of course unclear whether that was done with malicious intent: [media]https://twitter.com/Capt_Privilege/status/722371216619778049[/media] (This seems to only have surfaced after Jesse Singal wrote a smear piece on her and they went back and forth on Twitter. She said she'd stay off Twitter for a few days, but then [URL="http://archive.is/70LdU"]she came back after around ten hours just now[/URL] :v:)

[QUOTE=Fangz;50139804]She [url=https://medium.com/@randileeharper/an-open-letter-to-social-autopsy-ae64fccdcfe#.16ug1ykjv]wrote an open letter to them, where she flat out says they are part of the problem and calls them airheads[/url].[/QUOTE] It's almost as if she's learned something. However knowing that she's been doing almost exactly the same thing, a part of me wants to believe she's angry because she's not calling the shots, let alone in on it.

That isn't what doxxing is It's still a bit fucked but as far as I can tell it's not actually doxxing

[QUOTE=phygon;50161827]That isn't what doxxing is It's still a bit fucked but as far as I can tell it's not actually doxxing[/QUOTE] Considering there are basically no verification stopgaps planned for, it's effectively an invitation to crowdsourced vigilanteism.

[QUOTE=elixwhitetail;50162760]Considering there are basically no verification stopgaps planned for, it's effectively an invitation to crowdsourced vigilanteism.[/QUOTE] Oh, definitely It's terrible, just not as terrible as doxxing

[QUOTE=phygon;50163144]Oh, definitely It's terrible, just not as terrible as doxxing[/QUOTE] it's in the [I]"potato potatoe"[/I] category. The end-results are most likely to be the same, and that's in the end (hurr) what matters.

[QUOTE=Tamschi;50160778][...] [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1475810&p=50160311&viewfull=1#post50160311"]There's apparently evidence[/URL] that points towards Quinn leaking their email conversation to her followers on her private account, but it's of course unclear whether that was done with malicious intent: [...][/QUOTE] [URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1475810&p=50166227&viewfull=1#post50166227"]Here's more evidence that she shared it without redacting the sender.[/URL]

This is so open to abuse it isn't even funny.