WikiLeaks cyberattacks now involve Visa, Facebook, Twitter, MasterCard - Polidicks

Paypal won't even load for me right now :frown: [editline]8th December 2010[/editline] back up again.

[QUOTE=IceTea;26579879]Cool. Cyber war. LET'S FUCK SHIT UP.[/QUOTE] God please don't

/b/ needs a good DDoSing themselves See how they like it Paypal isn't working for me now, fucking wonderful. I have 3 clients going apeshit because they think it's a virus and I can't do anything

Motherfuckers, Amazon? They better not screw with Amazon.

[QUOTE=Esrange;26583005]/b/ needs a good DDoSing themselves [/QUOTE] That happens all the time. :colbert:

[QUOTE=superdinoman;26583029]That happens all the time. :colbert:[/QUOTE] I mean something that would adleast disrupt their little raiding circlejerking Lets ask China to do it

Hacktavists suck.

Lol amazon is now selling the cables for kindle... 7$

Why the hell are they attacking Twitter? For "censoring" the Wikileaks trending topic? If so, I hope they know it's because Twitter favors novelty over popularity, ever since Justin Bieber kept being at the top for 3 weeks a few months ago The whole Anonymous herd can be fine most of the time, but right now they're all acting on a giant self-created "hurr fuc da govrment" bandwagon

[QUOTE=Esrange;26583037]I mean something that would adleast disrupt their little raiding circlejerking Lets ask China to do it[/QUOTE] Funny you say that when quite a bit of the Botnet computers are in China.

[QUOTE=Max of S2D;26583139]Why the hell are they attacking Twitter?[/QUOTE] Because they're fucking dumb as a rock.

Fuck. This is getting out of hand.

Fuck you Anon, you pieces of horrifically stupid shit. Peoples income depend on these sites. They are LITERALLY children that have no fucking idea what the hell is going on, why would Assange want this in the first place?

[QUOTE=RayDark;26583252]Fuck you Anon, you pieces of horrifically stupid shit. Peoples income depend on these sites. They are LITERALLY children that have no fucking idea what the hell is going on, why would Assange want this in the first place?[/QUOTE] Because Assange is a jackass. Fuck all of you hippie "freedom fighters" who think the government should be some transparent truth-telling no secrets machine.

[QUOTE=faze;26583257]Because Assange is a jackass. Fuck all of you hippie "freedom fighters" who think the government should be some transparent truth-telling no secrets machine.[/QUOTE] Assange himself has an agenda, until I find out what, I remain neutral, but Wikileaks itself is a powerful too. And yes, a government cannot function with transparency, the alpha needs to be at a moderate percentage.

[QUOTE=RayDark;26583286]Assange himself has an agenda, until I find out what, I remain neutral, but Wikileaks itself is a powerful too. And yes, a government cannot function with transparency, the alpha needs to be at a moderate percentage.[/QUOTE] He most certainly does have an agenda. I'm sure this is following his plan too. Why else would he turn himself in for false rape allegations? Everyone knows the story...the women come onto him, he fucks them, and they cry rape.

It all loads up fine for me. . . Is it over?

[QUOTE=faze;26583305]He most certainly does have an agenda. I'm sure this is following his plan too. Why else would he turn himself in for false rape allegations? Everyone knows the story...the women come onto him, he fucks them, and they cry rape.[/QUOTE] Nah, he's doing this so he is safe from assassination, but can still have his outside people utilize wikileaks to it's fullest. Had he not gone to jail voluntarily, the chances of him being killed would be much, much higher. Now, if the government does kill him, they look terrible, and as such, they are more reluctant to do that.

[QUOTE=Doctor_Communism;26579129]4chan and Facepunch are pretty much the same thing other than the fact we're smaller. Also I'm going to keep posting. Also this is going to escalate very quickly.[/QUOTE] The main difference is the ability to remain anonymous in 4chan, although it might not seem like it would affect much, it actually does.

[QUOTE=PrusseluskenV2;26583720]The faggots should stop. They're going way too far.[/QUOTE] Yup. These fuckers need to be hung up to dry too.

Personally, I don't see anything wrong with it, in fact they are more saving the US from looking like China.

[QUOTE=Boilrig;26583758]Personally, I don't see anything wrong with it, in fact they are more saving the US from looking like China.[/QUOTE] So you're all for this "hacktavism" shit?

I don't know what to think of all this shit. Mr Assange is being treated like a criminal. No decisive evidence. Some people choose to take actions. Nobody is right or wrong in all that stuff

[QUOTE=Sonic4Ever;26583941]I don't know what to think of all this shit. Mr Assange is being treated like a criminal. No decisive evidence. Some people choose to take actions. Nobody is right or wrong in all that stuff[/QUOTE] What the flying fuck are you talking about? Assange ran/runs a website called wikileaks, and he 100% knows what goes on there. At the very least, he's guilty of some kind of conspiricy, since he's involved in leaking classfied data. If people were posting kiddy porn on Facepunch, and Garry did nothing about it, would that not make him involved in it since it's his website? Same goes if somebody has drugs in your car while you're driving - your car, your fault.

[QUOTE=faze;26583951]What the flying fuck are you talking about? Assange ran/runs a website called wikileaks, and he 100% knows what goes on there. At the very least, he's guilty of some kind of conspiricy, since he's involved in leaking classfied data. If people were posting kiddy porn on Facepunch, and Garry did nothing about it, would that not make him involved in it since it's his website? Same goes if somebody has drugs in your car while you're driving - your car, your fault.[/QUOTE] Except publishing leaks is a protected and quite legal act.

[QUOTE=Snuffy;26583984]Except publishing leaks is a protected and quite legal act.[/QUOTE] There's whistleblowing (i.e. exposing corruption) and then there's leaking classified data. Two different things.

[QUOTE=Zeke129;26579569]Bad reading You're bitching that Paypal can't process your payments I'm betting that Wikileaks, as a Paypal customer, would have liked them to continue processing THEIR donations as well I followed up by asking how you'd feel if the government didn't approve of your site and pressured paypal into shutting down your payments[/QUOTE] I would be pissed, but I wouldn't ruin it for everyone else.

[QUOTE=faze;26583999]There's whistleblowing (i.e. exposing corruption) and then there's leaking classified data. Two different things.[/QUOTE] You need to leak documents for corruption to be exposed. How is [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1333920/WikiLeaks-Hillary-Clinton-ordered-U-S-diplomats-spy-UN-leaders.html]Hillary Clinton ordering diplomats to spy on world leaders[/url] any different? What makes [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers]The Pentagon Papers[/url] any more moral than what WikiLeaks is doing?

Stupid fucking kids have no idea what goes on behind the scenes to keep their country a safe place. I gauran-fucking-tee that the majority of Julian supporters are either between the ages 12-20, are fucking stupid, or both. [editline]9th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Snuffy;26584051]You need to leak documents for corruption to be exposed. How is [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1333920/WikiLeaks-Hillary-Clinton-ordered-U-S-diplomats-spy-UN-leaders.html]Hillary Clinton ordering diplomats to spy on world leaders[/url] any different? What makes [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers]The Pentagon Papers[/url] any more moral than what WikiLeaks is doing?[/QUOTE] But they're not just leaking documents to expose corruption, they're leaking dangerous documents that jeopardize national security as well. WikiLeaks doesn't appear to give a shit about what they leak, as long as it gets leaked. If they were just whistle blowing against corrupt politicians, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

[QUOTE=Erebus.;26579134]It's hard to counter attack a bunch of sweaty basement dwellers that hide behind proxies.[/QUOTE] Proxy's don't work when DDoS'ing, as explained on the Anon DDoS tutorial, you would be targeting the Proxy instead of the website you try to DDoS. [editline]9th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Dmarine;26584060]Stupid fucking kids have no idea what goes on behind the scenes to keep their country a safe place. I gauran-fucking-tee that the majority of Julian supporters are either between the ages 12-20, are fucking stupid, or both. [editline]9th December 2010[/editline] But they're not just leaking documents to expose corruption, they're leaking dangerous documents that jeopardize national security as well. WikiLeaks doesn't appear to give a shit about what they leak, as long as it gets leaked. If they were just whistle blowing against corrupt politicians, we wouldn't be having this discussion.[/QUOTE] Because that is not their job, their job is to provide a platform to be able to release leaked documents, not decide what gets leaked.