• U.S. & Pakistan fail to reach deal on supply routes ahead of NATO summit; Pakistan asks for $5,000 p
    32 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Bucketboy;36039473]Well, Your saying that Pakistian is funding the " Terrorists " but if we go back in time, guess who funded these so called " Terrorists " Pakistan has good reasons not to help the Nato, because if they do the country gets fucked up by the Talibans, and when Pakistan dont want to help the Nato then its considered as a Terrorist Funder. Now Thats [B]Bullshit[/B].[/QUOTE] You show a complete lack of knowledge of modern history.
[QUOTE=Bucketboy;36039473]Well, Your saying that Pakistian is funding the " Terrorists " but if we go back in time, guess who funded these so called " Terrorists " Pakistan has good reasons not to help the Nato, because if they do the country gets fucked up by the Talibans, and when Pakistan dont want to help the Nato then its considered as a Terrorist Funder. Now Thats [B]Bullshit[/B].[/QUOTE] wow you're stupid #1: Pakistan's ISI will fund the terrorists (ahem, insurgents) either way #2: Pakistan's government isn't the one solid entity most people would like to believe it is #3: US aid to the Afghani insurgents was THROUGH Pakistan l2history
[QUOTE=Bucketboy;36039473]Well, Your saying that Pakistian is funding the " Terrorists " but if we go back in time, guess who funded these so called " Terrorists " Pakistan has good reasons not to help the Nato, because if they do the country gets fucked up by the Talibans, and when Pakistan dont want to help the Nato then its considered as a Terrorist Funder. Now Thats [B]Bullshit[/B].[/QUOTE] No, the common theory is that if we stop funding them, then they will in turn fund terrorism as a method of avoiding attacks internally. If they don't choose that route, then great. We still won't be friends, but at least we don't have to be enemies.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.