[QUOTE=Siminov;21670567]Treyarch sucks at gamemaking, COD MW was the best one recently, WaW is fun, but I will never buy another Treyarch game because they completely butcher any realism. Cod 3 nightmares are still in the back of my head.[/QUOTE]
Ahahah....
You are going to honestly try to make the argument that ANY CoD game is "realistic"?! Oh God, that's hilarious and ignorant.
[QUOTE=Tac Error;21671854]No.
Go wait for Homefront or whatever Kaos Studios is making if you want a World in Conflict FPS.[/QUOTE]
Not quite my friend!
Homefront is set sometime in the future where Koreans, not Russians, invade the US.
...
Alright, granted it's pretty much WiC the FPS bar those differences.
I'm tempted by the promise of Vietnam levels, but I don't want to fund Kotick's evil war machine.
[QUOTE=Rooster Assassin;21669167]As long as it's 50 dollars on the PC with dedicated servers, I might think about getting in :saddowns:
[editline]02:10PM[/editline]
It*, Woops.[/QUOTE]
You want it to be 50 dollars?
[QUOTE=mastermaul;21664653]What the fuck.
Where the fuck is the COD: Vietnam we were told we were going to get. I'm fucking mad now.[/QUOTE]
Are you retarded?
I'm guessing most of this game takes place in Vietnam (Or other southeastern asian countries), and we were never told CoD:Vietnam was real.
CoD: Black os has been talked about for a while (At least in the CoD subforum)
Jeez lots of Call of Duty hate. I'm actually going to give it a chance instead of condemning it [i]at the first trailer[/i].
/total fanboy
Way to be so damn negative. After the catastrophe that was MW2, I'll buy this up in a storm because I'm stupid and I like giving my money away to Activision-Blizzard.
Well, after the crippling disappointment that was MW2, and the MP40-Centric Multiplayer that was World at War, I'm very wary about this game. I'm still probably going to buy it, but still. Doesn't exactly look promising.
COD was great until MW2
Does anyone think this is just COD3 and COD5, only with reskins and different maps?
no, shut up you negative nancy
[editline]05:01PM[/editline]
team fortress 2 is just team fortress classic with reskins and different maps
ps3 is just ps2 with reskins and different maps
[QUOTE=bepassley;21677836]team fortress 2 is just team fortress classic with reskins and different maps[/quote]
Uh... no.
ps3 is just ps2 with reskins and different maps[/QUOTE]
I don't think the PS3 reskinned anything or has maps.
[editline]06:07PM[/editline]
[quote]ps3 is just ps2 with reskins and different maps[/QUOTE]*
[QUOTE=killz2much;21677995]Uh... no.
ps3 is just ps2 with reskins and different maps[/QUOTE]
I don't think the PS3 reskinned anything or has maps.
[editline]06:07PM[/editline]
*[/QUOTE]
ps3 is just a reskinned ps2 and has different maps on it
argue that bitch
Hopefully it's more about the vietnam war than the cold war...
I, for one, greatly anticipate Treyarch's new CoD game.
[spoiler]Unless it's pay-to-play and hasn't got dedicated servers, in which case I will blindly defend my right to hate it.[/spoiler]
[editline]12:05AM[/editline]
Dammit, spoiler no workie. :saddowns:
[QUOTE=kill3r;21674045]You want it to be 50 dollars?[/QUOTE]
Better than the overkill $60 we've been seeing on a lot of games recently.
Oh god I need to remember to never go into a Facepunch thread involving CoD ever again. It's always people bandwagoning and people bitching about bandwagoning, and the people who bitch about it are even worse and accuse anyone who has an opinion of bandwagoning. I hated MW2's multiplayer after trying the free weekend (and no it wasn't just because of the hackers) and was just plain bored by WaW so I don't have high hopes for future CoD games, now shower me in boxes and blind accusations.
[QUOTE=OutOfExile;21680097]Oh god I need to remember to never go into a Facepunch thread involving CoD ever again. It's always people bandwagoning and people bitching about bandwagoning, and the people who bitch about it are even worse and accuse anyone who has an opinion of bandwagoning. I hated MW2's multiplayer after trying the free weekend (and no it wasn't just because of the hackers) and was just plain bored by WaW so I don't have high hopes for future CoD games, now shower me in boxes and blind accusations.[/QUOTE]
oh god and there's the people with large egos who think they're above everyone by bitching about the people bitching about people bitching.
[QUOTE=Zips;21673479]Ahahah....
You are going to honestly try to make the argument that ANY CoD game is "realistic"?! Oh God, that's hilarious and ignorant.[/QUOTE]
I didn't say that they were realistic, I SAID "Treyarch butchered [B][I][U]ANY[/U][/I][/B] realism left in the game." keyword is any.
Hey guys, is it not too late for me to hop on the bandwagon and say the game sucks too? :downs:
Well if i was judging the game from this reveal i would say it looks like hyped up shit ( no surprise ) but on the other hand im going to wait for the actual game.
I'll buy it if they put in Grenada or Panama.
Right now, I don't want to judge before it comes out.
wow what the fuck is this shit? They just released MW2 and now they are creating a new one? Why don't they fix the problem and many many issues from the previous games, mainly MW2.
Fucking dumbass company is just doing this for the money. Fucking retards.
[QUOTE=Bullet100;21686616]wow what the fuck is this shit? They just released MW2 and now they are creating a new one? Why don't they fix the problem and many many issues from the previous games, mainly MW2.
Fucking dumbass company is just doing this for the money. Fucking retards.[/QUOTE]
Are you an idiot?
COD4 was awesome
[editline]05:52PM[/editline]
and fuck you guys take games far to seriously
[QUOTE=Bullet100;21686616]wow what the fuck is this shit? They just released MW2 and now they are creating a new one? Why don't they fix the problem and many many issues from the previous games, mainly MW2.
Fucking dumbass company is just doing this for the money. Fucking retards.[/QUOTE]
God damn that's a very stupid comment. IW made MW2 and MW. Treyarch made World at War and now Black Ops.
How freaking hard is that for you to grasp?
One dev team has NOTHING to do with the other and each game has a two year development cycle.
[editline]04:47AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Siminov;21680758]I didn't say that they were realistic, I SAID "Treyarch butchered [B][I][U]ANY[/U][/I][/B] realism left in the game." keyword is any.[/QUOTE]
I'm still laughing pretty hard that you think there was any more realism in any of the IW developed games compared to the Treyarch developed ones.
[QUOTE=MattSif;21664245]When I saw Treyarch I basically knew the game is gonna be shit, i'm still disappointed from[B] Call of Duty: World At War[/B]..[/QUOTE]
It's the only CoD game I actually finished. All others were so fucking boring.
[QUOTE=Cold Blood;21665723]"Better be better than MW2 <insert more whining>" Another feeling I have is everyone is basing their opinion for MW2 off of the multiplayer. Sure there are a bunch of prepubescent little shits all over it but I base my opinion on the [b]singleplayer which I thought was damn good... until the cliffhanger ending.[/b] Bastards.[/QUOTE]
Didn't the story trail off like halfway through, with the Military teaming up with the Terrorists?
Every CoD until 4 was amazing. After 4, it started to deteriorate. 5 was a nice change, and since Treyarch is making this too, I have hope for it still. But I need to see more before I go either way.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
