• Republicans Outraged At Obama's Decision Not To Go To War With Iran; Want To Do It Themselves
    116 replies, posted
[URL="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/feb/17/rand-paul/rand-paul-says-zeroing-out-non-military-discretion/"]Cutting all non-military discretionary spending will still not lead to a balanced budget.[/URL] And these people want to start another war, while screaming about spending cuts to balance the budget (so long as these cuts aren't defense cuts). What does that tell you about their knowledge of economics? I wouldn't trust these people with five dollars, let alone the economic well-being of an international superpower.
Who fucking cares if iran makes nuclear weapons, not like they will use them or are even presenting a threat to anyone other than the surrounding countries(they wont attack them anyway). Goddamn republicans.
[QUOTE=SpaceGhost;33278110]Who fucking cares if iran makes nuclear weapons, not like they will use them or are even presenting a threat to anyone other than the surrounding countries(they wont attack them anyway). Goddamn republicans.[/QUOTE] "Noo!! omg wat if iran gives nuclear weapons to talibans!" = Every republican who supports war with Iran's mindset.
[QUOTE=SpaceGhost;33278110]Who fucking cares if iran makes nuclear weapons[/QUOTE] A lot of people actually.
[QUOTE=LiquidNazgul;33278302]A lot of people actually.[/QUOTE] No shit, but people get way to worked up over it and perceive them as a actual threat, which is hilarious.
Implying Iran randomly decided to go hostile some day and nuke Germany, which is in Shahab-4 missiles range they would do no damage due to NATO missile defences.
[QUOTE=Van-man;33275243]Funny enough NATO is [I]well known[/I] for being the opposite of that. It's the US that likes to jump the gun, due to the GOP. The fuck have you been inhaling?[/QUOTE] I hate to do this because stereotyping people is pretty bad, but he is from (or lives in) Serbia. Hatred towards NATO is kinda to be expected.
[QUOTE=Jsm;33278633]I hate to do this because stereotyping people is pretty bad, but he is from (or lives in) Serbia. Hatred towards NATO is kinda to be expected.[/QUOTE] Sadly this is a common occurrence whenever a person from Serbia hears about NATO. Old wounds and all.
"Republicans outraged at party failure rate of intelligence tests. Cites missing bible quote memorization and civil exploitation section."
[QUOTE=doonbugie2;33278623]Implying Iran randomly decided to go hostile some day and nuke Germany, which is in Shahab-4 missiles range they would do no damage due to NATO missile defences.[/QUOTE] Nato is just USA's reign used to direct their allies towards their own goals.
republicans make captain america sad
[QUOTE=doonbugie2;33278623]Implying Iran randomly decided to go hostile some day and nuke Germany, which is in Shahab-4 missiles range they would do no damage due to NATO missile defences.[/QUOTE]Implying anyone would lift a finger to save the instigator of two world wars and ensuing depressions.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;33284674]Implying anyone would lift a finger to save the instigator of two world wars and ensuing depressions.[/QUOTE] "Mommy, what country is Doitzland?" "It's that little country next to the Netherlands, honey."
[QUOTE=Bomimo;33284674]Implying anyone would lift a finger to save the instigator of two world wars and ensuing depressions.[/QUOTE] Uh, you know who started WWI? Serbia. And do you know who started WWII? Nationalism.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;33284931]Uh, you know who started WWI? Serbia. And do you know who started WWII? Nationalism.[/QUOTE] I would argue that Austria-Hungary started it. The member of the Serbian Black Hand who shot Ferdinand was no representative of the Serbian government.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;33284674]Implying anyone would lift a finger to save the instigator of two world wars and ensuing depressions.[/QUOTE] We're sure as fuck going to defend Germany if any-one attacks them, thank you very much.
[QUOTE=bobsmit;33265671][URL="http://kazooobjectivist.blogspot.com/2007/09/how-to-solve-americas-terrorism-problem.html"]I had no idea the republicans were objectivists[/URL] If you needed any more proof they were childish and silly.[/QUOTE] Am I alone when I say that the guy who wrote that piece of garbage is either trolling or completely fucking nuts?
[QUOTE=Bomimo;33284674]Implying anyone would lift a finger to save the instigator of two world wars and ensuing depressions.[/QUOTE] No one is that pathetic and willing to risk the safety of the world. And they wouldn't need to lift a finger anyway, its automated.
Can we make some kind of rule that fat white businessmen can't declare war then sit in offices being paid to have the poor fight?
Id sent these fuckers to iran to fight if they really want a war
Start a war? What for?! So more lives and more money are lost for no reason?
Can someone please explain to me how fighting in ww2 boosted our economy yet fighting in iran would hurt our economy?
[QUOTE=Maximo13;33284931]Uh, you know who started WWI? Serbia. And do you know who started WWII? Nationalism.[/QUOTE]WW2 was started by fucking Germany. Not my a political idea. Those are too abstract and non-existential in physical form to start a war. War is conflict between states. Scott Pilgr- Germany VS the world in this case. WW1 turned Germany VS the world too. But yeah. we would have to lift a finger. I'd probably just skip for Australia or New Zealand in that event. If everyone is insistent on turning the northern hemisphere into a shithole of poverty and conflict then I'm taking off. I'd rather be a fucking kiwi than be the victim of insane politicians whims. I mean. There's no way Scandinavia will actually man up and tell everyone to go fuck themselves... nope, we gotta be noble/asslickers as usual. No fucking backbone to find here. [editline]15th November 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=meppers;33287396]Can someone please explain to me how fighting in ww2 boosted our economy yet fighting in iran would hurt our economy?[/QUOTE]This time you've stretched your resources enough by participating in 3 parallel conflicts to make your prez rich. Producing more weapons in a country where they are as common as they could possibly get isn't gonna boost any kind of economy. Now charging money to kick a republican in the balls would boost your economy! People from all over the world would travel there to get the chance. Besides. How is a state that has no money going to pay civilians to make weapons?
YA BECAUSE WAR IS REALLY WORKIN OUT RIGHT NOW /caps
[QUOTE=Bomimo;33288880]WW2 was started by fucking Germany. Not my a political idea. Those are too abstract and non-existential in physical form to start a war. War is conflict between states. Scott Pilgr- Germany VS the world in this case. WW1 turned Germany VS the world too. But yeah. we would have to lift a finger. I'd probably just skip for Australia or New Zealand in that event. If everyone is insistent on turning the northern hemisphere into a shithole of poverty and conflict then I'm taking off. I'd rather be a fucking kiwi than be the victim of insane politicians whims. I mean. There's no way Scandinavia will actually man up and tell everyone to go fuck themselves... nope, we gotta be noble/asslickers as usual. No fucking backbone to find here.[/QUOTE] Uh, Austro-Hungarian Empire?
[QUOTE=meppers;33287396]Can someone please explain to me how fighting in ww2 boosted our economy yet fighting in iran would hurt our economy?[/QUOTE] WW2 provided an abundance of new jobs in a economic slump. A conflict with Iran would not create any significant number of new jobs, and would cost large amounts of money to put on. Wartime taxes were much, much higher in WW2 also.
[QUOTE=meppers;33287396]Can someone please explain to me how fighting in ww2 boosted our economy yet fighting in iran would hurt our economy?[/QUOTE] WW2 boosted the economy because it provided a lot of jobs that weren't there before. fighting with iran wouldn't do anything of the sort because the dod is already gigantic and america fighting wars is arguably what got them into this poor financial state anyway [editline]15th November 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Ogopogo;33289175]WW2 provided an abundance of new jobs in a economic slump. A conflict with Iran would not create any significant number of new jobs, and would cost large amounts of money to put on. Wartime taxes were much, much higher in WW2 also.[/QUOTE] Yeah I don't think there have been any wartime taxes during the recent ones. Taxes always bad apparently.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.