• NSFW: Activists preform sex acts nude during church service
    346 replies, posted
why haven't they been imprisoned for endangering minors i don't care they did it in a church but they intentionally fucked in front of kids which is p much illegal and horrible
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;30241260]why haven't they been imprisoned for endangering minors i don't care they did it in a church but they intentionally fucked in front of kids which is p much illegal and horrible[/QUOTE] They were arrested.
[QUOTE=Sanius;30241212]so what? people being disrespectful is not noteworthy[/QUOTE] It's similar to walking into a catholic church with a burning cross.
[i]holy fuck[/i] :smug:
[QUOTE=killkill85;30238693]Are you saying they should have sex in a burning church[/QUOTE] Yeah, that way it'd be win-win
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30241330]It's similar to walking into a catholic church with a burning cross.[/QUOTE] yes because bodily functions are equivalent to lighting a symbol on fire and potentially burning a building down
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30239298]Unless you have a rather low IQ I'm sure you can work out why it's disrespectful[/QUOTE] disrespectful to whom
[QUOTE=DrBreen;30241405]disrespectful to whom[/QUOTE] Maybe like the people who work there and the people who go there who don't want to see random people fuck in front of them?
[QUOTE=Sanius;30241385]yes because bodily functions are equivalent to lighting a symbol on fire and potentially burning a building down[/QUOTE] Being a bodily function does not make it okay to do in public
[QUOTE=LarparNar;30241270]They were arrested.[/QUOTE] endangering minors carries a heavier sentence than public disturbance
[QUOTE=DrBreen;30238770]I can't see how this is disrespectful, it's public "nudity" but someone can explain to me? i find this hilarious actually.[/QUOTE] it's scandinavia public nudity isn't "omg save the children" like in the states, it's more along the lines of "heh they have no clothes"
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;30241562]endangering minors carries a heavier sentence than public disturbance[/QUOTE] please explain to me, without emotional appeal, how any children were endangered
[QUOTE=Sanius;30241600]please explain to me, without emotional appeal, how any children were endangered[/QUOTE] the guy might have accidentally got his dick stuck in a child's vagina
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30241648]the guy might have accidentally got his dick stuck in a child's vagina[/QUOTE] well, now that you've said that, everything is clear. praise jesus
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30241574]it's scandinavia "public nudity" isn't "omg save the children" like in the states, it's more along the lines of "heh they have no clothes"[/QUOTE] difference between public nudity and simulated intercourse [editline]4th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Sanius;30241600]please explain to me, without emotional appeal, how any children were endangered[/QUOTE] physically it does no harm, however it is extraordinarily inappropriate and causes emotional distress in many children (not long term) [editline]4th June 2011[/editline] are you trying to argue that having intercourse in front of children is appropriate conduct?
Sanius you have a weird way of seeing things
just as sexual conduct is illegal in the workplace as it can make employees uncomfortable and feel insecure, it can have similar effects on children i'm not a "save the children" fanatic but to argue that sexual conduct and simulated sex in front of them is appropriate and should not carry repercussions is asinine
They will get the same punishment regardless if there were kids around or not. The Norwegian laws are different than the laws in the US. Get over it.
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;30241804] i'm not a "save the children" fanatic but to argue that sexual conduct and simulated sex in front of them is appropriate and should not carry repercussions is asinine[/QUOTE] it should carry repercussions, but the consequences associated with "endangering a minor" are far too harsh for this situation
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;30241701] physically it does no harm, however it is extraordinarily inappropriate and causes emotional distress in many children (not long term) [/QUOTE] it causes distress in children because children are taught that the human body is something you should be ashamed of. if the societal norm was to be ashamed of my nose, uncovering my nose and picking it would be the equivalent to this situation. it's completely ridiculous and not worthy of a prison sentence because it causes no actual harm.
[QUOTE=Sanius;30242082]it causes distress in children because children are taught that the human body is something you should be ashamed of. if the societal norm was to be ashamed of my nose, uncovering my nose and picking it would be the equivalent to this situation. it's completely ridiculous and not worthy of a prison sentence because it causes no actual harm.[/QUOTE] exactly, thank you for a proper response and not a troll answer
[QUOTE=Sanius;30242082]it causes distress in children because children are taught that the human body is something you should be ashamed of. if the societal norm was to be ashamed of my nose, uncovering my nose and picking it would be the equivalent to this situation. it's completely ridiculous and not worthy of a prison sentence because it causes no actual harm.[/QUOTE] But if people don't want to see it, why should they be made too? Also you could say the same about a lot of societies laws. If the majority of people don't want to see it then it should be illegal to do in public as it is indecent.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30242227]But if people don't want to see it, why should they be made too? Also you could say the same about a lot of societies laws. If the majority of people don't want to see it then it should be illegal to do in public as it is indecent.[/QUOTE] here's a question, who decides what is indecent and what isn't?
[QUOTE=DrBreen;30242397]here's a question, who decides what is indecent and what isn't?[/QUOTE] The majority, at least for that which happens in public places any way.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30242227]But if people don't want to see it, why should they be made too? [/QUOTE] nobody was made to look at them [editline]4th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=carcarcargo;30242227]If the majority of people don't want to see it then it should be illegal to do in public as it is indecent.[/QUOTE] no it shouldn't. laws should only be put in place to protect people from harm. you do not have the right to not be offended
[QUOTE=Sanius;30242506]nobody was made to look at them [editline]4th June 2011[/editline] no it shouldn't. laws should only be put in place to protect people from harm. you do not have the right to not be offended[/QUOTE] Wrong, This technically counts as sexual harassment in a way.
Norwegian culture.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30243434]Wrong, This technically counts as sexual harassment in a way.[/QUOTE] no it doesn't don't try to alter the definition of a word to bolster your argument
Zoinks!
[QUOTE=JDK721;30244000]no it doesn't don't try to alter the definition of a word to bolster your argument[/QUOTE] The main fact is, it's illegal whether you agree with it or not.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.