• NSFW: Activists preform sex acts nude during church service
    346 replies, posted
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30244125]The main fact is, it's illegal whether you agree with it or not.[/QUOTE] Nobody here is discussing whether it's legal or not. We all agree that it is illegal.
[QUOTE=Kazumi;30228173]Haha, read it in the papers today. [b]Fucking[/b] hilarious![/QUOTE] 'Fucking' hilarious, eh?
[QUOTE=Ond kaja;30244292]Nobody here is discussing whether it's legal or not. We all agree that it is illegal.[/QUOTE] And it should stay that way.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30244304]And it should stay that way.[/QUOTE] why
[QUOTE=JDK721;30244337]why[/QUOTE] Because the public wants it to stay that way.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30244385]Because the public wants it to stay that way.[/QUOTE] many people don't want to legalize gay marriage does that justify keeping it illegal?
[QUOTE=JDK721;30244403]many people don't want to legalize gay marriage does that justify keeping it illegal?[/QUOTE] That's discrimination. Indecency is indiscriminate
[QUOTE=JDK721;30244403]many people don't want to legalize gay marriage does that justify keeping it illegal?[/QUOTE] Not a majority though. Also what carcarcargo said before me.
the point is that "because the public wants it to stay that way" is NOT a valid reason on deciding the legality of something
[QUOTE=Pretiacruento;30229039][img]http://gfx.dagbladet.no/labrador/167/167768/16776863/jpg/active/729x.jpg[/img] That woman has literally [I]no[/I] tits![/QUOTE] [img]http://i.imgur.com/mMrYU.jpg[/img] ?
[QUOTE=JDK721;30244484]the point is that "because the public wants it to stay that way" is NOT a valid reason on deciding the legality of something[/QUOTE] It is in a PUBLIC place
[QUOTE=JDK721;30244403]many people don't want to legalize gay marriage does that justify keeping it illegal?[/QUOTE] Is it discrimination if people can walk to work when someone is rolling to work in a wheelchair? Hey, lets put everyone in a wheelchair.
[QUOTE=JDK721;30244337]why[/QUOTE] Again we find the typical "DO FUCKING ANYTHING" attitude held by Sanius and JDK and all those fun guys
[QUOTE=JDK721;30244484]the point is that "because the public wants it to stay that way" is NOT a valid reason on deciding the legality of something[/QUOTE] find me something in the universal declaration of human rights that says we should allow public fuckery and i will spin on a fucking dime jdk find it [editline]4th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Sanius;30242082]it causes distress in children because children are taught that the human body is something you should be ashamed of. if the societal norm was to be ashamed of my nose, uncovering my nose and picking it would be the equivalent to this situation. it's completely ridiculous and not worthy of a prison sentence because it causes no actual harm.[/QUOTE] yes everything [I]is[/I] a social construct. and like I just said to jdk, I'm all in favor of changing societal norms as long as it serves a practical purpose, such as providing gays the rights not to be murdered on the street, to wed and experience the tax benefits, and for the blacks to be freed from slavery. but i fail to see any [B]legitimate[/B] reason why intercourse in the public sector in front of children should be permitted. what benefit does it serve. please, enlighten me.
It seems there are two general ends of a spectrum as far as views on sex go:[list] [*]One end thinks sex is something that everyone should enjoy and shouldn't really entail a relationship [*]One end things it's a private thing and doesn't want it to be extremely mainstream and public [/list] Again it is a spectrum, people can be in between. Sure, fine, if you're in the former group, go out and find a club called Club Imagination and have a wild 300-person orgy. Fine, go ahead. The problem lies in the fact that so often, people from the former group will see instances like this of people forcing their views on people in the LATTER group, and ask "Oh well what's wrong with that? It needs to be LEGAL!" If you want to have wild sex do it privately. We don't want to see it.
I don't know why some Facepunchers are supporting the actions. This is outrageous and they are doing it for no reason other than to piss off a bunch of people practicing their own religion in peace, and to get attention. This doesn't support a good cause in any way, and even if it did, this would not be the way. If you're an atheist who hates and condones all forms of religion being practiced, then another term used to describe a person like you would be "idiot".
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30245164]It seems there are two general ends of a spectrum as far as views on sex go:[list] [*]One end thinks sex is something that everyone should enjoy and shouldn't really entail a relationship [*]One end things it's a private thing and doesn't want it to be extremely mainstream and public [/list] Again it is a spectrum, people can be in between. Sure, fine, if you're in the former group, go out and find a club called Club Imagination and have a wild 300-person orgy. Fine, go ahead. The problem lies in the fact that so often, people from the former group will see instances like this of people forcing their views on people in the LATTER group, and ask "Oh well what's wrong with that? It needs to be LEGAL!" If you want to have wild sex do it privately. We don't want to see it.[/QUOTE] Post of the year. Well not actually, but it's a great post nevertheless.
[QUOTE=Leaf Runner;30245233]I don't know why some Facepunchers are supporting the actions. This is outrageous and they are doing it for no reason other than to piss off a bunch of people practicing their own religion in peace, and to get attention. This doesn't support a good cause in any way, and even if it did, this would not be the way. If you're an atheist who hates and condones all forms of religion being practiced, then another term used to describe a person like you would be "idiot".[/QUOTE] hi i'm an athiest liberal and i agree with this post and if you don't you're an idiot
[QUOTE=Leaf Runner;30245233]If you're an atheist who hates and [b]condones[/b] all forms of religion being practiced, then another term used to describe a person like you would be "idiot".[/QUOTE] I assume you mean "condemns"
[QUOTE=yawmwen;30233366]your statement was extreme enough to seem like you were serious[/QUOTE] i figured the "missionary position" part would have given it away, but ok.
[img]http://gyazo.com/34c8bd4453f781817b35ffbea20fa218.png[/img] What the fuck is that?
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30244506]It is in a PUBLIC place[/QUOTE] You don't have the right to not be offended.
[QUOTE=CommunistCookie;30246062]You don't have the right to not be offended.[/QUOTE] You don't have the right to go fuck wherever you want.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30242227]But if people don't want to see it, why should they be made too? [/QUOTE] Well that's why fucking in a public place is illegal But to say it's "endangering a minor" is totally asinine [editline]4th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=DOG X9282;30245925][img]http://gyazo.com/34c8bd4453f781817b35ffbea20fa218.png[/img] What the fuck is that?[/QUOTE] A picture of a person's face that you zoomed in on
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30246132]Well that's why fucking in a public place is illegal But to say it's "endangering a minor" is totally asinine [/QUOTE] I don't think I ever agree'd with the endangering a minor part.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30246418]I don't think I ever agree'd with the endangering a minor part.[/QUOTE] frankly I'd like to see everyone just stop being prudes altogether
But I see such morals as being that which separates us from other animals, other than our intelligence of course, and I feel many people in the world agree with me.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;30247155]But I see such morals as being that which separates us from other animals, other than our intelligence of course, and I feel many people in the world agree with me.[/QUOTE] what's immoral about nudity
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;30241562]endangering minors carries a heavier sentence than public disturbance[/QUOTE] Please keep your american soccer mom ideals out of scandinavia, thank you.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30247664]what's immoral about nudity[/QUOTE] I guess it's seen as animalistic, probably one of the only things I can see against it
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.