NSFW: Activists preform sex acts nude during church service

[DrBreen]

[QUOTE=Zeke129;30250796]what does atheism have to do with anything

when did you stop making good posts[/QUOTE]

When things get personal it generally affects judgment, be it religion, etc

it's just probably his weak spot

[Dori]

the only argument for indecency laws is "it's illegal because it's bad and it's bad because it's illegal"

[DrBreen]

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;30250878]I'm trying, but it's hard when the opposition consists of "no one wants to see you naked", and "it's indecent".[/QUOTE]

No reason for trying, just smoke some pot like i did and it all makes sense

[Megafan]

[QUOTE=DrBreen;30250929]No reason for trying, just smoke some pot like i did and it all makes sense[/QUOTE]

Oh yeah, I hear you Portuguese legalized most drugs not too long ago, right?

[Elecbullet]

No promiscuous person is offended by a man and a woman NOT having sex in the street. But some people value monogamy and will be offended if men and women are allowed to walk the streets naked and fuck.

People should, if they want to have promiscuous sex and orgies, keep it in private. What fucking harm is done? How hard is that?

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251011]No promiscuous person is offended by a man and a woman NOT having sex in the street. But some people value monogamy and will be offended if men and women are allowed to walk the streets naked and fuck.
[/QUOTE]

the amish are offended by the use of electricity. who gives a fuck?

also, aren't you the same person who argued that homosexuals should stay in the closet if they don't want problems?

[DrBreen]

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;30251000]Oh yeah, I hear you Portuguese legalized most drugs not too long ago, right?[/QUOTE]

decriminalized only

man this afghan pot is the shit

[editline]5th June 2011[/editline]

i wonder how i can still spell properly

[Elecbullet]

Which is why we draw a line at a reasonable point.

To say that "no sex is allowed in public" is hardly a limitation on freedom. Fuck in private if you must.

But to open the floodgates to open public sexual activity makes way for just that - open public sexual activity, which in the end forces YOUR viewpoint upon the majority of people, who are in favor of monogamous relationships with private sexual activity, and constitutes a major change in society for them for the worse.

It is a big imbalance of benefits versus consequences.

[Megafan]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251095]Which is why we draw a line at a reasonable point.

To say that "no sex is allowed in public" is hardly a limitation on freedom. Fuck in private if you must.

But to open the floodgates to open public sexual activity makes way for just that - open public sexual activity, which in the end forces YOUR viewpoint upon the majority of people, who are in favor of monogamous relationships with private sexual activity, and constitutes a major change in society for them for the worse.

It is a big imbalance of benefits versus consequences.[/QUOTE]

Oh no, open sexuality, however will you survive?

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251095]
To say that "no sex is allowed in public" is hardly a limitation on freedom. Fuck in private if you must.
[/QUOTE]

uh no

saying that you can't do what you want with your body is the biggest limitation that exists for humans

[Wootman]

If people were allowed to get naked out in the public there would be a increase in sex crimes.

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Wootman;30251188]If people were allowed to get naked out in the public there would be a increase in sex crimes.[/QUOTE]

and you base this on... what? rapes in nude beaches and nudist colonies?

[Elecbullet]

[QUOTE=Sanius;30251182]uh no

saying that you can't do what you want with your body is the biggest limitation that exists for humans[/QUOTE]

See I guess you could call it by a different name and make it sound really nasty but then I could call it "you can have as much sex as you like but you have to be in private".

Sometimes for the benefit of the greater good a restriction on freedoms is necessary. 100% freedom doesn't necessarily mean good.

[Megafan]

[QUOTE=Wootman;30251188]If people were allowed to get naked out in the public there would be a increase in sex crimes.[/QUOTE]

I guess that's why rape is so prevalent in nudist beaches and colonies? Oh wait, it's not.

[editline]4th June 2011[/editline]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251218]Sometimes for the benefit of the greater good a restriction on freedoms is necessary. 100% freedom doesn't necessarily mean good.[/QUOTE]

If we were discussing something that actually hurts society, like allowing monopolies or legalizing murder, then I'd agree, but this is just sex.

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251218]See I guess you could call it by a different name and make it sound really nasty but then I could call it "you can have as much sex as you like but you have to be in private".[/QUOTE]

could you repeat that in comprehensible English, without misanthropic undertones? thanks

[Elecbullet]

[QUOTE=Sanius;30251253]could you repeat that in comprehensible English, without misanthropic undertones? thanks[/QUOTE]

In theory banning public sex can be called "You can't do what you want with your body", and could sound like the most awful thing the most oppressive government could ever do.

In reality all it means is "You have to make sure there are 4 walls around you before you bump uglies", and it doesn't really sound like such a horrible thing to do now does it?

[DrBreen]

[QUOTE=Wootman;30251188]If people were allowed to get naked out in the public there would be a increase in sex crimes.[/QUOTE]

Do you have any idea how this works? are you home schooled? if people were allowed to get naked in public, in due time, nudity would be visually desexualized, and thus it would be as standard of wearing clothes. it would be awfully cold for some people though so clothes are a good thing.

In comparison, in the 18th century woman weren't allowed to show legs and used long dresses accordingly, what this means is that men of the time had became fetishistic at legs; whereas now a chick with huge tits using a bra makes us horny.

There would be literally no increase in sex crimes.

Do you hear that? oh! i believe it's the sound of your argument self destructing! SPLOSHHHBOOOM

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251289]
In reality all it means is "You have to make sure there are 4 walls around you before you bump uglies", and it doesn't really sound like such a horrible thing to do now does it?[/QUOTE]

are you trolling? the same thought process can be applied to justifying the use of burqas. you're a misogynistic piece of trash.

[Elecbullet]

[QUOTE=Sanius;30251320]are you trolling?[/QUOTE]

Nope just not entirely for the sexualization of society

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251356]Nope just not entirely for the sexualization of society[/QUOTE]

...

the "sexualization" of society only exists because of indecency laws. there is nothing sexual about the human body in a society that doesn't enforce clothing

[DrBreen]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251356]Nope just not entirely for the sexualization of society[/QUOTE]

How old are you? don't worry i won't judge, different age groups have different opinions.

fuck i'm fucking starving, i bet africans smoked a lot of this shit and ate all their food and now they're starving

holy fuck i'm so high

i'm going to bed i feel like my eyeballs are having sex

anyways i thought i ended the thread an hour ago, EJECTING THREAD what the fkc

[Elecbullet]

[QUOTE=Sanius;30251320]are you trolling? the same thought process can be applied to justifying the use of burqas. you're a misogynistic piece of trash.[/QUOTE]

"This person doesn't think people should have the right to have sex in public! He must [i]hate women![/i]"

I am 16.

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251431]"This person doesn't think people should have the right to have sex in public! He must [i]hate women![/i]"
[/QUOTE]

are you okay with men not covering their breasts, but think that women should cover theirs? if so, you're a misogynist. it's as simple as that and there's no way around it

[DrBreen]

[QUOTE=Sanius;30251449]are you okay with men not covering their breasts, but think that women should cover theirs? if so, you're a misogynist. it's as simple as that and there's no way around it[/QUOTE]

you ha a point

[Megafan]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251431]"This person doesn't think people should have the right to have sex in public! He must [i]hate women![/i]"[/QUOTE]

You do understand that it being illegal doesn't actually stop or help anyone, and the sentences that can be connected to it are grossly over-the-top? Just because it becomes legal doesn't mean you'll be seeing it on every street corner or even ever happening.

[editline]4th June 2011[/editline]

[QUOTE=DrBreen;30251464]you ha a point[/QUOTE]

Even when high you know that he makes a good point.

[Elecbullet]

[QUOTE=DrBreen;30251464]you ha a point[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DrBreen;30251408]EJECTING THREAD what the fkc[/QUOTE]

We're waiting

[editline]4th June 2011[/editline]

[QUOTE=Sanius;30251449]are you okay with men not covering their breasts, but think that women should cover theirs? if so, you're a misogynist. it's as simple as that and there's no way around it[/QUOTE]

Again we find that the difference in the restriction of rights in [i]theory[/i] and in [i]reality[/i] is great. In theory it can be considered an expicitly discriminatory law to force them to cover up. In reality it can be considered "You have to wear a shirt. Big deal."

I don't think that warrants being called a misogynist

[DrBreen]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251493]We're waiting[/QUOTE]

you're just jealous because i have the best weed money can buy

and you suck at arguments

[Elecbullet]

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;30251470]You do understand that it being illegal doesn't actually stop or help anyone, and the sentences that can be connected to it are grossly over-the-top? Just because it becomes legal doesn't mean you'll be seeing it on every street corner or even ever happening.[/QUOTE]

Can I get some information on the sentences please

[editline]4th June 2011[/editline]

[QUOTE=DrBreen;30251549]you're just jealous because i have the best weed money can buy

and you suck at arguments[/QUOTE]

I am a bit jealous of that weed

And I do sorta suck

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251493]In theory it can be considered an expicitly discriminatory law to force them to cover up. In reality it can be considered "You have to wear a shirt. Big deal."
[/QUOTE]

[img]http://i.imgur.com/MOvSF.gif[/img]

[DrBreen]

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30251555]Can I get some information on the sentences please

[editline]4th June 2011[/editline]

I am a bit jealous of that weed

And I do sorta suck[/QUOTE]

60€ a gram, got enough for about 10 blunts, and best of all i din't pay for it :v:

let's call it a day guys, there's no real point in arguing about this