[QUOTE=TheTalon;52097490]I think more would lean towards fighting, even those not in the military.
Imagine if Trump got taken out by another country. We all hate Trump but at the same time, he's our asshole. We wouldn't like very much that our President was killed in a strike. There would be people willing to fight because of it. Not for Trump, but for the office[/QUOTE]
It is extremely unfair to compare the assassination of Kim Jung-Un to that of President Trump. He and his family are not responsible for the enslavement, starvation, and death of millions.
[QUOTE=spazthemax;52089227]Its almost as reliable as a Game of Thrones season[/QUOTE]
GoT starts in July this year.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;52089778]I sincerely doubt we would be able to preemptively destroy 100% of every single gun at the same exact moment in time for them to never fire a single shell southward.[/QUOTE]
I report I remember reading put counter-battery fire destroying North Korean guns at a rate of a few percent per hour.
[QUOTE=Michael haxz;52101483]It is extremely unfair to compare the assassination of Kim Jung-Un to that of President Trump. He and his family are not responsible for the enslavement, starvation, and death of millions.[/QUOTE]
Not yet, anyway
[QUOTE=TheTalon;52103475]Not yet, anyway[/QUOTE]
oh [I]come on[/I]
there are plenty of legit reasons to be against trump but he's not going to enslave millions of people. The US military would intervene way before that happens, and Mattis/Pence/Kushner/Ivanka wouldnt stand for it.
Yeah... Trump might be a narcissistic moron, but he's not a tyrannical narcissistic moron.
The worst Trump would do is bomb the shit out of them and then ignore the humanitarian crisis that'd follow, citing, "America First." Which is still pretty shitty.
I doubt he'll enslave anyone, but war is shit. War displaces millions and kills hundreds of thousands, and we're well on our way down this road. Again
[QUOTE=ironman17;52089333]Can't we bomb the artillery pieces from high enough up that they won't know what hit them? Isn't that what we have stealth bombers for?
They can't level Seoul if their cannons have been reduced to scrap metal before they can even fire a shot.[/QUOTE]
They can't level Seoul anyway because not only is Seoul outside the range of most conventional gun based artillery without making significant advances beyond the DMZ, Seoul is also one of the largest cities and metropolitan areas [I]on the entire fucking planet[/I]. Artillery shells may make a big boom, but they're nowhere near the kind of ordnance you can use to level entire cities, much less cities the size of Seoul, and especially since massive siege guns went out of style. The biggest guns North Korea has are some repurposed coastal defense guns bolted on to T-50 chassis, and they only have a handful of them
The bigger concern for Seoul is if NK decides to put those old Cold War era missile launchers to use and fill them up with chemical nasties, because they're pretty much the only thing they have that could strike from beyond the DMZ
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
