Nintendo’s Public Relations Employee Alison Rapp Now Vocal for Pedophiles
393 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Crazy Ivan;49826164][B]I want to preface this with the statement that I believe Pedophilia is a heinous crime, and that I affirm the belief that measures should be taken to protect the innocent and vulnerable, particularly children.[/B]
[/quote]Pedophilia is not a heinous crime, child abuse is. just like how I'm not a rapist because I like adult women, Carl the pedophile isn't a rapist just because he likes kids. there can't be crime without action.[quote]
So let's talk about the criminality of Child Pornography, because that's [I]really[/I] what the issue here is. It's not that she's saying, "Pedophilia should be legal."
(Though she is saying there should be more grey space on the 'you are now a sex offender' band. It [I]is[/I] kind of ridiculous that say, an 18 year old with sexually explicit pictures of a 16 or 17 year old would be considered an equal criminal to a 40 year old with sexually explicit pictures of a 2 year old.)
Child Pornography carries a very special problem.
Some believe, perhaps rightly or wrongly I do not know and there is no sufficient body of evidence yet, that child pornography serves as an effective replacement for the sexual urges of someone who 'suffers from' or 'is' a pedophile. Even the idea of what pedophilia 'is' is a problem on some accounts. (Currently there's an argument over whether it is a mental illness, or some sort of deliberate decision [I]and Jesus Christ isn't that a fun can of worms.[/I])
Whatever the case, it [I]seems[/I] the possession of Child Pornography is something like a victimless crime. [B]Remembering particularly[/B] that is it independent and legally distinct from the production of such pornography or the sexual exploitation of a minor. It is still something we morally condemn, but it is, perhaps, difficult to say how things are improved with a focus on the pornography itself.
[/quote]Child pornography is most certainly not a victimless crime. Go watch some child porn real quick, point to the little boy or girl in the video, look me dead in the eyes and say "this child is not suffering and is not a victim."[quote]
So. This leads to a particular problem. Although there is no Mandatory Federal Minimum Sentence in relation to the possession of Child Pornography, and we [I]must[/I] bear in mind that such possession is typically charged [I]per item of pornography,[/I] the average sentence handed down by judges is increasing rapidly and sharply. It is not entirely uncommon for a sentence for a single count of possession of child pornography to be greater than a sentence for [B]murder.[/B] It would even make more 'sense' in terms of risk, in terms of the statistical averages, to rape and kill a single child than possess one hundred sexually explicit images.
That's fucked up.
The argument for the decriminalization of child pornography goes as follows:
You will actually deter pedophilia more by [I]decriminalizing the pornography,[/I] while increasing the punishment that actual pedophiles are dealt.
This is [I]not[/I] the decriminalization of the creation of child pornography, the sexual abuse or exploitation of a minor, or any such thing.
This is instead an argument that in terms of legal formality and criminal code, an overwhelming emphasis in terms of both punishment and focus is being given to the wrong part of the crime, in a way that actively makes the situation worse.
[/quote]the problem here is that decriminalizing child pornography legitimizes the market. increased market for child pornography means increased production of child pornography.[quote]
Some background assumptions to that argument are that the pornographic content is actually an effective substitute for the actual injurious act, and that pedophiles are typically people who need psychiatric help, not criminal punishment. Some of this is at least backed up by the fact that pedophiles who have gone to prison and come out, typically become more predatory and dangerous. The additional fact that sex-criminal laws are draconian to the point that it's easier to [I]create a new identity or live off of the legal grid,[/I] than to live with a sex-crime conviction only gives weight to the argument.
[B]I want to add one note, responding to a general argument I've picked up here:[/B] If you believe the criminality of child pornography serves as a method or measure to make society safer by taking pedophiles out of society, and 'treating' them, I cannot express in more strict terms that it is not the case. The current handling of the criminality of child pornography by courts world-wide only serves to demean and punish 'pedophiles' blindly, so that a person who has never even contemplated touching or harming a real child becomes categorically identical to someone who might have raped and murdered children. [I]That[/I]​ is in no way, justice.[/QUOTE]
I just saw a few points in your post that needed addressing
[editline]27th February 2016[/editline]
if you need to jerk it to kids that's what lolicon and shotacon are for. jerking it to real kids just makes more kids suffer
Conservatives
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Still shitposting" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Daniel Smith;49826761]Conservatives[/QUOTE]
no
[QUOTE=Max;49823949][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZbQymvL.png[/IMG]
What the fuck?
Like, I was exposed pretty early on in my childhood to gore (mostly from watching my dad play videogames like Duke Nukem and Doom) and I thought it was pretty disturbing and it made me feel nauseus.
I wouldn't want to force that unto any kid.[/QUOTE]
FUCKING BITCH!
How dare she use "Pterodactyl" in her username!
She forgot that I am the only Pterodactyl on this fucking planet!
[QUOTE=butre;49826661]Pedophilia is not a heinous crime, child abuse is. just like how I'm not a rapist because I like adult women, Carl the pedophile isn't a rapist just because he likes kids. there can't be crime without action.Child pornography is most certainly not a victimless crime. Go watch some child porn real quick, point to the little boy or girl in the video, look me dead in the eyes and say "this child is not suffering and is not a victim."the problem here is that decriminalizing child pornography legitimizes the market. increased market for child pornography means increased production of child pornography.
I just saw a few points in your post that needed addressing
[editline]27th February 2016[/editline]
if you need to jerk it to kids that's what lolicon and shotacon are for. jerking it to real kids just makes more kids suffer[/QUOTE]
If you actually read and considered the post, then you shouldn't need to "address" those points because they are either moot, or already addressed. I'll spare the text to respond though.
The possession of child pornography, which I substantatively talked about, is a victimless crime. The production of it, is, [I]and I stress again,[/I] a crime with a clear victim. In fact, that you go to length to say "hey Carl the pedo isn't hurting anyone" then turn around to, for some reason, elucidate on the victims of child pornography [B]production,[/B] seems incredibly odd.
In fact like, your 'few points' seem to simply ignore the argument in general. How does jerking off to a picture hurt someone? Let's even set aside what that picture might be. If you want to make some argument that it 'legitimizes the market,' that blatantly ignores that I explicitly stated, [I]no one is arguing for the decriminalization of the production of child pornography or the exploitation of minors.[/I]
[QUOTE=Max;49823949][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZbQymvL.png[/IMG]
What the fuck?
Like, I was exposed pretty early on in my childhood to gore (mostly from watching my dad play videogames like Duke Nukem and Doom) and I thought it was pretty disturbing and it made me feel nauseus.
I wouldn't want to force that unto any kid.[/QUOTE]
"Kids, come watch this cartel beheading!"
She's fucked up and should seriously not be anywhere near children. I wonder what her position on the Sarah Nyberg controversy is.
I know she said she would, but I doubt she was entirely serious. Seemed disingenuous to me especially with the :) at the end.
Jesus Christ what a crazy bitch. First comes legalizing child porn, next comes necrophilia.
You might as well legalize dog fucking while you are at it. If one degenerate harmful fetish gets it so should the others.
Don't give me this "Oh some people can't help it they are born with it feel bad for them" bullshit too. There is being a sick sexual kinky weirdo, and then there is being a sick sexual weirdo with a fetish that is harmful to society in very dark ways. If you can't control yourself at that point maybe you shouldn't be apart of the gene pool.
[QUOTE=Crazy Ivan;49827023]If you actually read and considered the post, then you shouldn't need to "address" those points because they are either moot, or already addressed. I'll spare the text to respond though.
The possession of child pornography, which I substantatively talked about, is a victimless crime. The production of it, is, [I]and I stress again,[/I] a crime with a clear victim. In fact, that you go to length to say "hey Carl the pedo isn't hurting anyone" then turn around to, for some reason, elucidate on the victims of child pornography [B]production,[/B] seems incredibly odd.
In fact like, your 'few points' seem to simply ignore the argument in general. How does jerking off to a picture hurt someone? Let's even set aside what that picture might be. If you want to make some argument that it 'legitimizes the market,' that blatantly ignores that I explicitly stated, [I]no one is arguing for the decriminalization of the production of child pornography or the exploitation of minors.[/I][/QUOTE]
The possession of child pornography is NOT a victimless crime, for christs sake just because you are not taking part in the abuse of these children does not mean you have no connection to these assaults as you are actively taking part in distribution and consumption of this material. firstly think of this, these children are people who are being raped, would you want video of some person raping you spread around? no and as such you would be a VICTIM of the distribution of images that show you being abused.
It honestly baffles me how you cannot see that this is directly a Victim driven crime
[QUOTE=Crazy Ivan;49827023]If you actually read and considered the post, then you shouldn't need to "address" those points because they are either moot, or already addressed. I'll spare the text to respond though.
The possession of child pornography, which I substantatively talked about, is a victimless crime. The production of it, is, [I]and I stress again,[/I] a crime with a clear victim. In fact, that you go to length to say "hey Carl the pedo isn't hurting anyone" then turn around to, for some reason, elucidate on the victims of child pornography [B]production,[/B] seems incredibly odd.
In fact like, your 'few points' seem to simply ignore the argument in general. How does jerking off to a picture hurt someone? Let's even set aside what that picture might be. If you want to make some argument that it 'legitimizes the market,' that blatantly ignores that I explicitly stated, [I]no one is arguing for the decriminalization of the production of child pornography or the exploitation of minors.[/I][/QUOTE]
If carl just likes kids that doesn't mean he's a consumer of child pornography.
consumption of child pornography isn't a victimless crime because consuming a product creates demand. whenever there's demand, there's production. whenever child pornography is being produced, there's a victim.
[QUOTE=Svinnik;49827044]
I wonder what her position on the Sarah Nyberg controversy is.[/QUOTE]
She probably supports her, since she has for a while been trying to get into "anti-gamergate crowd" for a while with no success:
[media]https://twitter.com/alisonrapp/status/656296055256936448[/media]
Alison Rapp also [url=https://twitter.com/mnemosynekurai]buried her old Twitter account, which it makes it hard to confirm things[/url] [url=https://archive.is/vEHgh]without archiving[/url].
oh wow, I remember her from the E3 Treehouse. This isn't the first time she says questionable shit.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/6hkAzbt.png[/img]
[QUOTE=Segab;49827320]oh wow, I remember her from the E3 Treehouse. This isn't the first time she says questionable shit.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/6hkAzbt.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Yeah, no, she needs to go. Nintendo would be better off.
She has responded to the article:
[media]https://twitter.com/alisonrapp/status/703717859621359616[/media]
[QUOTE=Segab;49827320]oh wow, I remember her from the E3 Treehouse. This isn't the first time she says questionable shit.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/6hkAzbt.png[/img][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Fangz;49827367]She has responded to the article:
[media]https://twitter.com/alisonrapp/status/703717859621359616[/media][/QUOTE]
And someone like this is in public relations? Wow.
[QUOTE=Zingly;49827421]And someone like this is in public relations? Wow.[/QUOTE]
Remember Bahar Mustafa? "Kill all white people" diversity officer.
The far left has gone mad.
[QUOTE=Zingly;49827421]And someone like this is in public relations? Wow.[/QUOTE]
They probably didn't caught on to her before. Well, until now that is, most likely.
Wonder how her first job interview went.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;49827547]Remember Bahar Mustafa? "Kill all white people" diversity officer.
The far left has gone mad.[/QUOTE]
Yes, she totally wants to kill white people and wasn't just making a dumb joke.
Most "SJW infested" places I see like /r/shitredditsays actually shit on any pedo apology they see, when I've heard of you saying how loli isn't "that bad" and is "natural".
[QUOTE=GarbageCan;49827662]Yes, she totally wants to kill white people and wasn't just making a dumb joke.
Most "SJW infested" places I see like /r/shitredditsays actually shit on any pedo apology they see, when I've heard of you saying how loli isn't "that bad" and is "natural".[/QUOTE]
Do you think that's a joke that a diversity officer should make?
[QUOTE=GarbageCan;49827662]Yes, she totally wants to kill white people and wasn't just making a dumb joke.
Most "SJW infested" places I see like /r/shitredditsays actually shit on any pedo apology they see, when I've heard of you saying how loli isn't "that bad" and is "natural".[/QUOTE]
yeah, if a white diversity officer said kill all black people as a joke, they'd lose their job asap
that's a racist joke, no matter the race it was targeted at
[QUOTE=Svinnik;49827774]yeah, if a white diversity officer said kill all black people as a joke, they'd lose their job asap
that's a racist joke, no matter the race it was targeted at[/QUOTE]
It's not racist at all. They changed the definition of "racism" so that it doesn't apply to them anymore.
[QUOTE=dustyjo;49827868]It's not racist at all. They changed the definition of "racism" so that it doesn't apply to them anymore.[/QUOTE]
Ah yes the "It's not racist if its towards a white person" racism.
[QUOTE=MissingGlitch;49827883]Ah yes the "It's not racist if it towards a white person" racist.[/QUOTE]
don't worry, it isn't a double standard. I redefined double standard so that it can't apply to me.
my opinions cant possibly be wrong because i said so!
[QUOTE=Fangz;49827367]She has responded to the article:
[media]https://twitter.com/alisonrapp/status/703717859621359616[/media][/QUOTE]
am i missing something or is GG entirely unrelated to this? (white supremacists even moreso)
[QUOTE=Furnost;49827948]am i missing something or is GG entirely unrelated to this? (white supremacists even moreso)[/QUOTE]
GG is a boogeyman much in the same way SJWs are.
complaining/blaming GG or MRAs is the equivalent of complaining/blaming feminists or SJWs
[QUOTE=Furnost;49827948]am i missing something or is GG entirely unrelated to this? (white supremacists even moreso)[/QUOTE]
GG is the new bogeyman for blaming all your problems on. Been for a while now.
[QUOTE=Anti Christ;49827952]GG is a boogeyman much in the same way SJWs are.
complaining/blaming GG or MRAs is the equivalent of complaining/blaming feminists or SJWs[/QUOTE]
i was kinda thinking that but white supremacists is just entirely out of left field, where the fuck is that one even coming from lol
-MY MERGE-
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
