Santorum: Doctors Providing Abortions To Rape And Incest Victims Should Be Arrested - Polidicks

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445492]which is sexist yea the legal system isnt racist its just that more black people are convicted[/QUOTE] Wow I can not believe you 1) made that comparison 2) Think it's purely racism as to why more black people are arrested statistically. [editline]14th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=yawmwen;30445502]a lot of mothers are bad mothers too[/QUOTE] Yeah. That's not the point in your statistic.

once again, causation is not correlation you have to look deeper than the statistics i.e. actual court transcripts

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445478]the dad almost never gets custody the mother gets custody most of the time this doesnt scream sexism to you?[/QUOTE] I think to be able to call it sexist or not, we'd have to read on the follow-up cases, if any exist.

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;30445505]2) Think it's purely racism as to why more black people are arrested statistically.[/quote] ok then its not racist just wanted to see how far you are willing to dig yourself into the ground [quote]Yeah. That's not the point in your statistic.[/QUOTE] the point in my statistic is the courts are inherently sexist to some degree

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445535]ok then its not racist just wanted to see how far you are willing to dig yourself into the ground[/QUOTE] I don't think he's the one digging himself into the ground here

ok let's try switching the order of the words this time correlation is not causation

[QUOTE=MisterMooth;30445548]I don't think he's the one digging himself into the ground here[/QUOTE] lol

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445535]ok then its not racist just wanted to see how far you are willing to dig yourself into the ground the point in my statistic is the courts are inherently sexist to some degree[/QUOTE] Yeah, me digging into the ground. Yes, black people get arrested more. Many get arrested entirely unfairly and I'm not fucking disputing that(Half this thread is you putting words in other posters mouths) but there are a reason for this, like black people lead lives in more dangerous zones and with more crime around. There are reasons for it, and I never said racism wasn't part of it. But how are you coming to that conclusion? By looking at numbers? Oh, right, that doesn't work when it comes to things that are not dictated by flipping a coin. In this case, women get the child more often because they're the more determined parent. [editline]14th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=yawmwen;30445562]lol[/QUOTE] Did glaber steal your account or some shit?

i don't think even glaber is this horribly misogynist

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;30445567] But how are you coming to that conclusion? By looking at numbers? Oh, right, that doesn't work when it comes to things that are not dictated by flipping a coin. In this case, women get the child more often because they're the more determined parent. [/QUOTE] no because the court is sexist iv known a few people with first hand experience with custody courts its a well known fact that they are slanted towards women saying they arent is the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming "i cant hear you!"

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445562]lol[/QUOTE] I'm still waiting on your proof of me being a misogynist

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445592]no because the court is sexist iv known a few people with first hand experience with custody courts its a well known fact that they are slanted towards women saying they arent is the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming "i cant hear you!"[/QUOTE] And saying it's a well known fact is the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming "i cant hear you!" I know from my father, who is a divorce lawyer, first hand what douche bags dads are. My experience is anecdotal. Yours is anec-fucking-dotal.

[QUOTE=MisterMooth;30445594]I'm still waiting on your proof of me being a misogynist[/QUOTE] im waiting for the proof that you arent

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445592]no because the court is sexist iv known a few people with first hand experience with custody courts its a well known fact that they are slanted towards women saying they arent is the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming "i cant hear you!"[/QUOTE] well if it's so obvious then you must be able to provide something more concrete than anecdotes and a statistic that says nothing

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445602]im waiting for the proof that you arent[/QUOTE] Wow, you're even going so far as to break burden of proof. man, i'm waiting for you to prove to me you're not glaber, or a pink elephant who's typing dumb shit through a miracle.

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;30445601] I know from my father, who is a divorce lawyer, first hand what douche bags dads are. My experience is anecdotal. Yours is anec-fucking-dotal.[/QUOTE] thats very misandrous of your father

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445602]im waiting for the proof that you arent[/QUOTE] These things don't work that way, buddy (you're not really my buddy)

[QUOTE=MisterMooth;30445618]These things don't work that way, buddy (you're not really my buddy)[/QUOTE] he's not your buddy guy

[QUOTE=Lazor;30445605]well if it's so obvious then you must be able to provide something more concrete than anecdotes and a statistic that says nothing[/QUOTE] like what? you want me to go evaluate thousands of court manuscripts and compile a complete report? anecdotes and statistical evidence are sufficient, if you cant provide evidence to the contrary you have no argument now

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445627]like what? you want me to go evaluate thousands of court manuscripts and compile a complete report? anecdotes and statistical evidence are sufficient, if you cant provide evidence to the contrary you have no argument now[/QUOTE] anecdotes are not fucking sufficient evidence that an entire court system is inherently sexist. statistics do jack shit on their own [b]correlation is not causation. get it through your god damned head[/b]

[QUOTE=MisterMooth;30445618]These things don't work that way, buddy (you're not really my buddy)[/QUOTE] in case you havent noticed i wasnt serious its called tounge in cheek dont get so mad bro

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445616]thats very misandrous of your father[/QUOTE] I think you're just suffering temporary downs or trolling because by no means is someone, a lawyer, who has to deal equally with both sides, and has to make a decision that he knows determines someone elses future heavily, is misandrous. Honestly, no one is this stupid. Do we need to relive how many dads have been bad dads? Yes, there are bad moms, and I'm not negating that, but that's not the point. How is it sexist by just statistics that you're interpreting.

[QUOTE=Lazor;30445636]anecdotes are not fucking sufficient evidence that an entire court system is inherently sexist. statistics do jack shit on their own [/QUOTE] the anecdotes support my interpretation of the statistics you have yet to provide any evidence to the contrary you are wrong

no actually that's not how that works

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445652]the anecdotes support my interpretation of the statistics you have yet to provide any evidence to the contrary you are wrong[/QUOTE] wow, I don't even know what to do when you see such stupidity like, even glaber rarely gets this dumb. i remember another time you said you just like to be nitpicky in arguments, well, you know what's wrong with being nitpicky when you haven't a clue what you're talking about? see this thread.

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445644]in case you havent noticed i wasnt serious its called tounge in cheek dont get so mad bro[/QUOTE] Please tell me all your other posts in this thread haven't been serious as well

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;30445648]I think you're just suffering temporary downs or trolling because by no means is someone, a lawyer, who has to deal equally with both sides, and has to make a decision that he knows determines someone elses future heavily, is misandrous. [/QUOTE] yea just like racist lawyers and judges are impossible lol just because someones a lawyer doesnt change the fact he is discriminatory hell maybe he isnt, im just using what you said [quote]what douche bags dads are[/quote] which implies all dads and inherently douchebags, which is incredibly misandrous [editline]14th June 2011[/editline] [quote]i remember another time you said you just like to be nitpicky in arguments, well, you know what's wrong with being nitpicky when you haven't a clue what you're talking about? see this thread.[/QUOTE] i dont like to be, i have to be its called compulsion [editline]14th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=MisterMooth;30445676]Please tell me all your other posts in this thread haven't been serious as well[/QUOTE] some have, some havent, some are over emotional some are objective, it really depends on the post

[QUOTE=yawmwen;30445679]yea just like racist lawyers and judges are impossible lol just because someones a lawyer doesnt change the fact he is discriminatory hell maybe he isnt, im just using what you said which implies all dads and inherently douchebags, which is incredibly misandrous[/QUOTE] Wow did I say they weren't? No, they very clearly are. Yes, because when I say that, i'm speaking of specific cases where I can think of a father doing something terrible. Like stealing the kid from the mother and running away for a month, returning the kid malnourished and sickened. Or like the instance of a dad fearing he'd lose custody of the kid, drank himself into a stupor, and beat the kid. Hell, I have seriously, 50 or 60 of these to recall. I'm not, and have never been saying mothers can't be bad mothers, but there's a fucking reason for that so called "sexism". It's only fucking sexism because you're interpreting as so, but statistics themselves say nothing at all. It doesn't imply sexism to anyone who actually has any grasp on statistics. I'm done with this thread and the rest of the posters should be too, you're the new glaber.

statistics combined with weak anecdote don't work either, in case you were confused actually his anecdotes nullify yours so i guess all you have is a useless statistic again

snip