Chinese Military Says US Launched Global War To Bring Down China, Promises Retaliation - Polidicks

More propaganda [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luZtl2J3sR0[/media] "Trinity and Beyond" is a pretty badass documentary.

[QUOTE=booster;31626264][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP33K72nmDo&feature=related[/media] I love this video. Yeah, I wouldn't want to be China's enemy in a war.[/QUOTE] [Img]http://gyazo.com/f9fb9d0be06a688a033d79472535798e.png[/Img] military budgets I think we'd do all right.

[QUOTE=Chilean;31626883][Img]http://gyazo.com/f9fb9d0be06a688a033d79472535798e.png[/Img] military budgets I think we'd do all right.[/QUOTE] China Vs USA would probably not happen (yet atleast) But if it happened it'd be pretty much Quantity Vs Quality. (nukes not included that is) Also, as I've said 1000 times before. The American defense budget is ridiculously overkill. I mean that is alot of tax money. It's like you're preparing for 5 world wars every year.

[QUOTE=Zycoses;31626587]"The Coming Collapse of China" Author, what a great source for unbiased news. also, uploaded by wakeup2NWO[/QUOTE] If some moron uploaded a news broadcast which he/she isn't the author of, it doesn't mean that this news broadcast is invalid. This is some simple logic.

[QUOTE=booster;31626905] (nukes not included that is) [/QUOTE] How can you NOT include nukes?

[QUOTE=Chilean;31626883][Img]http://gyazo.com/f9fb9d0be06a688a033d79472535798e.png[/Img] military budgets I think we'd do all right.[/QUOTE] Lol nuff' said right there. Seriously. Even if the US cut over half of that we'd still be in the lead and a HUGE bitch to fight. But so would China. So everyone knows it'd be best if nothing happened like always.

[QUOTE=Glorbo;31627024]How can you NOT include nukes?[/QUOTE] [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction]M.A.D[/url]

[QUOTE=Glorbo;31627024]How can you NOT include nukes?[/QUOTE] Both parts will just fuck themselves up.

I hope you guys realize that the sources don't even match what the OP is talking about.

Plus both countries signed CTBT

[QUOTE=Chilean;31627279]Plus both countries signed CTBT[/QUOTE] Yeah, just like the Soviet Union and the Nazi Germany have signed the Non-Aggression Pact.

[QUOTE=booster;31627122][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction]M.A.D[/url][/QUOTE] [QUOTE=kimr120;31627188]Both parts will just fuck themselves up.[/QUOTE] Exactly the reason why China would not want to invade/go to war with the US, and vice versa. Do you have a point?

[QUOTE=carcarcargo;31625269]It would probably help the US economy, I mean it was world war 2 that fixed up the economy last time it went to hell.[/QUOTE] No, it didn't. [QUOTE=LunchboxOfDoom;31626109]Angus needs to make a Cold War Round II version of this whole situation. *comic[/QUOTE] Missed the part where the United States supplied the USSR with tons of resources and information after World War 2, and then the part where they stole a lot more of it after that, even as we were supplying them with stuff still. Even during the Cold War. Because that's kind of hilarious.

[QUOTE=RandomVariable;31627317]Yeah, just like the Soviet Union and the Nazi Germany have signed the Non-Aggression Pact.[/QUOTE] If the chinese start lobbing nuclear bombs, we have the best defenses. We even have vaults, reserve your place in a vault-tec VAULT TODAY!

[QUOTE=RandomVariable;31627317]Yeah, just like the Soviet Union and the Nazi Germany have signed the Non-Aggression Pact.[/QUOTE] How is this even remotely comparable to what he said

[QUOTE=Glorbo;31627422]How is this even remotely comparable to what he said[/QUOTE] I think he's trying to say that their word isn't worth the paper it's written on

I think we need to give china a nice time out.

Well, time to move to Switzerland! Their shield of neutrality and chocolate should repel all the nukes.

[QUOTE=s0beit;31627441]I think he's trying to say that their word isn't worth the paper it's written on[/QUOTE] He can say that as much as he wants, doesn't mean it's true. It's basically slipping in godwins law without anyone noticing. "China signed a treaty huh? Well, you know who else signed a treaty? [B]HITLER[/B].

[QUOTE=Glorbo;31627478]He can say that as much as he wants, doesn't mean it's true. It's basically slipping in godwins law without anyone noticing. "China signed a treaty ha? Well, you know who else signed a treaty? [B]HITLER[/B].[/QUOTE] I'm fucking pissed off at china.

[b]NOT MY SMOKE STACKS!![/b]

wait what [editline]9th August 2011[/editline] is this serious

No, it's sensational. Basically China is doing what america is doing, telling us that "cyber attacks" will be considered acts of war and like that some "US army official" said: "If you shut down our powergrid maybe we will drop a few missiles down your smokestacks."

Let's see the sources: One is an article saying Pentagon Considers Cyber Attacks To Be Acts Of War and the other is on a website that is quite honestly insane. By the way, I want to point out exactly how crazy a source it is. Their youtube account is called "NotForSale2NWO". RandomVariable, you are an idiot if you think you can pass off an article from theintelhub and an unrelated article from an actual media site as news.

Wow if everyone could stop being dicks for ONE MINUTE PLEASE.

[QUOTE=booster;31626905]China Vs USA would probably not happen (yet atleast) But if it happened it'd be pretty much Quantity Vs Quality. (nukes not included that is) Also, as I've said 1000 times before. The American defense budget is ridiculously overkill. I mean that is alot of tax money. It's like you're preparing for 5 world wars every year.[/QUOTE] This is 99% probably not what's actually going on but with fossil fuel shortages in the near future and the entire world economy and infrastructure relying on fossil fuels it wouldn't be a bad idea to start gearing up your defenses to a ridiculous level now so when shit hits the fan five miles down the road you're the only one who prepared for it militarily. That said most of those defenses rely on, what a surprise, fossil fuels. But then again the US has been pretty hesitant about obtaining oil from it's own territory. Maybe that's why, buy everyone else's oil and when they run out you have your own supply and the means to defend it. Granted all the money poured into defense could be used to avoid the crisis in the first place, but common sense is not exactly prevalent in history.

So the Arab spring, technically a good thing by over throwing ruthless Dictators is affecting China?

[QUOTE=carcarcargo;31625105]China seems to think that because the US is in debt that they're weak and are now trying to wrestle the title of world power from them.[/QUOTE] Owe someone 20 bucks and they own you, owe someone billions of dollars, you own them. China can suck the US's balls. If they go into war we aren't going to pay them a fucking cent. We've still got the power, and I get the hunch that the US/allies could beat yellow ass/allies in this situation.

So, there'll be a war between China and the US, and when the dust settles down Brazil will rise as the greatest empire in history really we'll dominate you all

China's just using some bullshit paranoia to justify needless conflict. *sniff* They grow up so fast.