2spooky: Swedish Woman Charged For Sexing Herself With Human Skeletons
150 replies, posted
[QUOTE=DeveloperConsol;38528092]bones =/= alive people(personality)
what are you on about
having sex with centuries-old bones that nobody cares about is not something I'd say is severe.
it doesn't affect anybody, especially if the bones are most likely random and have no value to anybody.[/QUOTE]
Someone please figure out this guys real name so we can tell his parents and shit.
[QUOTE=Swebonny;38529371]A Swedish forum has dug up loads of stuff about her. It's quite obvious that she's a necrophile. Also had some body bags. One can only imagine what she intended to do...[/QUOTE]
link to some of the stuff they've found?
[QUOTE=DeveloperConsol;38527750]Bones are mostly minerals. How exactly is this immoral?[/QUOTE]
Humans are just structures made of carbon. Why is it immoral to shoot them?
[editline]20th November 2012[/editline]
(this is how dumb you are)
[QUOTE=DeveloperConsol;38527750]Bones are mostly minerals. How exactly is this immoral?[/QUOTE]
Your adress is only a physical reference point and your body is composed of exactly the same components as a pig, and your intelligence is mostly remiscent of one. Why is it illegal for me to figure out your physical reference point and aqquire sexual gratifcation through your still living but yet incapicitated tissue then use it as material for a hotdog like i would usually do with that material that yours is so remiscent of?
AND WHY ISNT IT ILLEGAL TO HAVE RETARDED LOLI AVATARS SERIOUSLY GUYS
Your money is nothing but a bunch of numbers wich are again bytes wich are again electrical charges, or sometimes small pieces of metal and paper.
Please hand me all your electrical charges, small pieces of metal and paper, i can find more value of it than worthless you.
Oh and while we are at it, can i please murder your family? Its just people you know, like you say, right?
[QUOTE=TippZ;38529442]flashback?[/QUOTE]
Of course ;)
[editline]20th November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=koeniginator;38529542]link to some of the stuff they've found?[/QUOTE]
Well here's the FUP, which literally translated would be preliminary investigation protocoll. Sucks that you need some premium shit to download it though. It's also in Swedish.
[url]www.speedyshare.com%2FAy8YW%2FGoteborgs-TR-B-11058-12-aktbil-37.pdf[/url]
Here on page three she (Waterlily) argues for necrophilia:
[url]http://www.uncommonforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=10824&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30[/url]
Im sorry for my flamy bits but when dumb people try to sound smart by throwing complete bullshit out in a completely unrelated place, like a dumb sperg, i just get my piss to a boil.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;38529472]Being sexually attracted to children, just like being sexually attracted to corpses IS okay, because you can't control it.
However, [B]acting[/B] on those urges isn't.[/QUOTE]
no it really isn't ok whether you're acting on them or not
Oh and I had to think of this Thread
[URL="http://www.intternetti.net/~jiri/motivation/4chanlaatu.jpg"]WARNING NSFW[/URL]
[QUOTE=God of Ashes;38529755]no it really isn't ok whether you're acting on them or not[/QUOTE]
They can't control it and it doesn't harm anybody
Why is it "not okay" to you
Why do people use sexing in this kind of sense? It means determining the gender of an animal...
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;38529886]They can't control it and it doesn't harm anybody
Why is it "not okay" to you[/QUOTE]
why reply
[B]edit:[/B]
do you know much about human mental and sexual development?
[QUOTE=J-RcZ;38530099]Why do people use sexing in this kind of sense? It means determining the gender of an animal...[/QUOTE]
maybe she isnt a necrophile
just a confused person trying to find out the gender of dead people
[QUOTE=dogmachines;38528116]The bones were a person, you don't fuck them out of respect for that person. Not to mention it's kind of fucked up to get your rocks off to something that is dead.[/QUOTE]
No. That might be why it's considered immoral to have sex with a random dead person, but that is not why it's illegal. It's illegal because that person can not give consent. It's the exact same reason why having sex with someone under the influence of drugs or alcohol is technically illegal.
[editline]oh hamburgers[/editline]
Rereading the thread, Developerconsol switched from illegal to immoral. So, nevermind this post.
[QUOTE=Desuh;38529798]Oh and I had to think of this Thread
[IMNOTLINKINGTOTHISFILTH][/QUOTE]
Dude, we'd have been better off not seeing the contents of your fap folder.
[QUOTE=Clio;38530178]maybe she isnt a necrophile
just a confused person trying to find out the gender of dead people[/QUOTE]
Why would she need to know that, when it's written on gravestone and you would judge what gender by name on it.
She had sex with a skeleton because she misunderstood what her friend suggested. She thought her friend said "You need to get laid, go out and look around for some coccyx."
Royzo you beast.
"You can take what you like, but don't rattle me bones!"
-Wise Sage
[QUOTE=DeveloperConsol;38527750]Bones are mostly minerals. How exactly is this immoral?
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Trolling or Creepy" - Swebonny))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
someones got a dead body fetish watch out guys
[QUOTE=J!NX;38533503]someones got a dead body fetish watch out guys[/QUOTE]
Dead people use facepunch? I know we strive to be inclusive, but I'm not okay with deadies on here.
[QUOTE=TonyP;38527566][thumb]http://www.thelocal.se/images/gallery/2664/26431.755.565.jpg[/thumb][/QUOTE]
I can imagine someone putting a blanket over the skull and using it as a decoy while they're assumed to be sleeping.
[QUOTE=Vodkavia;38536085]Well this is a strange thread about a strange person all right.
But just humor me on this guys and try to stave off the emotional weight that's pushing down on your keyboards. As disgusting and gruesome as necrophilia can be, what justification can you create for something that causes no harm to a person [B]if [/B]they consent to it? And I mean ACTUAL arguments that don't consist of "eww gross" or "my subjective morals define this as bad." I'm not saying the skeleton in the article was at any point consenting. They [I]might[/I] have which might explain how she got the skeleton so miraculously in the first place. You can already consent to what happens to your body in the form of donated organs and scientific research, unless you condemn that you should have no problem with consensual necrophilia other than "eww!" If such a system were in place, necrophiliacs could have an outlet for their urges without having to steal bodies.[/QUOTE]
because it disrespects the dead, and their bodies. if there is an after life i'd be pretty sad to see someone shoving my humerus up their cunt
Popped a boner
except consent can be revoked at any time
There isn't really anything wrong about necrophilia when it's consented, although a scenario where there's consent isn't very likely. (kinda like organ donating I guess?)
[editline]20th November 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=LordCrypto;38536174]except consent can be revoked at any time[/QUOTE]
So anyone's will is now considered void because it can be revoked?
Royzo you lucky bastard.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.