• FOX: Liberal Journalists Plotted to Protect Obama From Rev. Wright Scandal, Online Mag Say
    46 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;23511066]A lot of the things they blast Obama with is more or less legit but the problem is, they do similar things themselves.[/QUOTE] Except not at all.
If you do research instead of talking out your ass, they are truthful in a lot of it but they will blow it out of proportion and obviously, it's incredibly one-sided.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;23511338]If you do research instead of talking out your ass, they are truthful in a lot of it but they will blow it out of proportion and obviously, it's incredibly one-sided.[/QUOTE] Ok. Obama is a communist, racist, and a bad president. He's still doing less to hurt the country than a republican would.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;23511338]If you do research instead of talking out your ass, they are truthful in a lot of it but they will blow it out of proportion and obviously, it's incredibly one-sided.[/QUOTE] Can't do research if you don't know what to look up. "A lot of what they're saying" is a tad vague
i wonder how long before people start calling this a "-gate" reverendgate wrightgate meh, if climategate can be a popular term than so can those two
[QUOTE=Lazor;23511429]i wonder how long before people start calling this a "-gate" reverendgate wrightgate meh, if climategate can be a popular term than so can those two[/QUOTE] There's no fucking scandal here though. There's nothing here that's worthy of some scandalous bullshit.
climategate wasn't a scandal either
[QUOTE=Lazor;23511534]climategate wasn't a scandal either[/QUOTE] No, but that's the problem.
[QUOTE=Lazor;23511429]i wonder how long before people start calling this a "-gate" reverendgate wrightgate meh, if climategate can be a popular term than so can those two[/QUOTE] the whole gate thing is pretty stupid
Someone needs to do something scandalous at the Watergate hotel again so we can force the media to call it by something else. Or they could just give up and call it Watergate II
Okay it was called "Watergate" because that was the name of the hotel Taking the "gate" part and adding a prefix doesn't make any sense and is stupid Watergate did not involve water or gates so you cannot separate them
who knew one little not even serious post could derail the thread completely
[QUOTE=Lazor;23511836]who knew one little not even serious post could derail the thread completely[/QUOTE] I've only been here 3 months but i've learned that any ITN thread can turn into an argument at any time for any reason whatsoever. It's kind of fun, actually.
i've been here for three years and- holy shit i've been here for three years fuck me
I'm so sorry :smith:
Fucking liberals! They are the greatest threat to America since Arabs and Non-Cristians!
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;23511923]Fucking liberals! They are the greatest threat to America since Arabs and Non-Cristians![/QUOTE] Don't forget the gays!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.