'Internet's biggest troll' unmasked - Polidicks

[QUOTE=solid_jake;38064023]The wife needs to beat the ever loving shit out of him[/QUOTE] Or maybe she needs to fuck him more to keep his eyes off of little girl's asses. Maybe they could try an S&M theme. Kill two birds with one stone.

[QUOTE=OrionChronicles;38072689]If that was my daughter/little sister, the next post that pervert's account made would be his corpse with a 7.62mm hole in its head.[/QUOTE] Yes, because the appropriate response to creepy public photos being taken of your daughter or little sister is totally [I]murder.[/I]

[QUOTE=lavacano;38072702]Yes, the front page subreddits are objectively shit, but no matter what your opinion is on the rest of the site, r/nocontext is funny. [img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5733962/ShareX/2012-10/2012-10-17_02-17-33.png[/img] I mean shit.[/QUOTE] r/nocontext is [I]the best.[/I]

so how did they catch him?

[QUOTE=Glype;38073224]so how did they catch him?[/QUOTE] He used the same name for other things, had pictures taken of him at meet ups, etc. He's not as "anonymous" as some of his defenders like to paint him.

So, they just ruined a person's life and career because he was moderating two questionable subforums on a internet forum? And you guys are even saying he deserved it all? What the actual fuck is wrong with you people? [editline]17th October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=OrionChronicles;38072689]If that was my daughter/little sister, the next post that pervert's account made would be his corpse with a 7.62mm hole in its head.[/QUOTE] Great display of self-control and maturity right here.

[QUOTE=gokiyono;38072708]Well he were taking them from Facebook... Wouldn't instructing your daughter about "The dangers of the internet" not be a good idea first?[/QUOTE] Just because you could, doesn't mean you should. Or did your parents ignore you instead of teaching you valuable things in life? Besides teenagers do stupid shit all the time, nothing new about that, but does that make it fair to take advantage of them?

I hate it when people throw the word "troll" for situations that don't even apply to the word.

[QUOTE=avon43;38073533]I hate it when people throw the word "troll" for situations that don't even apply to the word.[/QUOTE] It's being used as a word for [I]"People I don't like / People I disagree with"[/I] nowadays but the mainstream media.

[QUOTE=NotMeh;38073386]So, they just ruined a person's life and career because he was moderating two questionable subforums on a internet forum? And you guys are even saying he deserved it all? What the actual fuck is wrong with you people? [/quote] Nothing. Anonymity doesn't change right and wrong. He obviously was only able to do these things because he was anonymous. So it was changed.

im against reddit because its cool to be against redit vote me moderator of facepunhe im cool

[QUOTE=Isuzu;38073799]im against reddit because its cool to be against redit vote me moderator of facepunhe im cool[/QUOTE] 2 c00l 4 sch00l amirite?

you got it buddy well d one

[QUOTE=Wii60;38064251]yes a reporter for Gawker adrian chen, who hates reddit. who techically did blackmail.[/QUOTE] Nah, that was just drama. Most of the shit was made up.

why is blackmail a felony i feel like it such a personal thing

[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;38064282]Technically? It's a federal felony. Title is very misleading. The true "trolls" are the reddit admins who defend child porn in the name of "free speech."[/QUOTE] This is why all of reddit is bad, by going to reddit you are giving your patronage to the reddit administration, who has done everything in their power to defend CP [editline]17th October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;38064791]It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic. Ah, what the heck I'll laugh anyway.[/QUOTE] Queue Batman crashing through glass

[QUOTE=Ezhik;38069983]good old facepunch, always thinking they're better than everyone[/QUOTE] so you make an edgy remark at someone stereotyping an entire community of completely different people, by stereotyping an entire community of completely different people gg

[QUOTE=Cloak Raider;38074706]so you make an edgy remark at someone stereotyping an entire community of completely different people, by stereotyping an entire community of completely different people gg[/QUOTE] He loves being a hypocrite when it comes to people criticizing things he like.

He deserves everything he got for being stupid enough to post all that controversial stuff without hiding his identity. He can't really complain. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/TyDXj.png[/IMG]

[QUOTE=Van-man;38073488]Just because you could, doesn't mean you should. Or did your parents ignore you instead of teaching you valuable things in life? Besides teenagers do stupid shit all the time, nothing new about that, but does that make it fair to take advantage of them?[/QUOTE] No. Tell me where I said it because I never said that anyone should. What I said was that it would be a good idea to teach kids that posting on the internet can have consequences. (Or I asked if it was a good idea to do.)

[QUOTE=agentalexandre;38064936]I really don't get what gave this guy the motive to go and meddle in this affair...[/QUOTE] Adrian Chen has a long history of trying to fuck with Reddit, most infamous was when on r/Iama (Basically an ask questions and shit about my interesting life subreddit) there was a user named LucidEnding who claimed he was going to die in 48 hours under Oregon's Death with Dignity Act instead of facing a life with cancer. What followed was the most genuine outpouring of emotion and support I have ever seen on an online community, and basically a massive talk on life. Two Days Later Chen falsely claimed to have been LucidEnding to 'troll' reddit and prove... that they are capable of human empathy I guess. Guy's a douchebag.

Adrien Chen - Massive fucking tool. Pisses me off that Gawker can make millions from this 'journalism' which equates to 'life-ruining' in the name of a good story.

[QUOTE=SCopE5000;38076198]Adrien Chen - Massive fucking tool. Pisses me off that Gawker can make millions from this 'journalism' which equates to 'life-ruining' in the name of a good story.[/QUOTE] Hey hey hey man ease down. 'good story'?

[QUOTE=Jookia;38076268]Hey hey hey man ease down. 'good story'?[/QUOTE] My bad, shitty story. It's a shame Adrien Chen can't be fired/sued/arrested for RL harassment.

[QUOTE=Carne;38066261] Chen was blackmailing this guy and threatening to reveal his identity if he didn't get it his way. That's not journalism. .[/QUOTE] This is absolutely not true and literally everyone involved in this that would even know(VA and Chen) have denied this. [editline]17th October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=SCopE5000;38076198]Adrien Chen - Massive fucking tool. Pisses me off that Gawker can make millions from this 'journalism' which equates to 'life-ruining' in the name of a good story.[/QUOTE] the only person responsible for VA's life being ruined is himself.

[QUOTE=Lazor;38076301]This is absolutely not true and literally everyone involved in this that would even know(VA and Chen) have denied this. [editline]17th October 2012[/editline] the only person responsible for VA's life being ruined is himself.[/QUOTE] What he did was odd, certainly, but not illegal. It's like if you bought a real doll, it would seem odd to lots of people, some people would even take serious offense to the existence of it - despite it being legal, you'd feel pretty shit if there was a public outcry about it and it may even degrade your quality of life as a result. He has as much right to enjoy creepshots as someone else does to enjoy going to church.

[QUOTE=SCopE5000;38076421] He has as much right to enjoy creepshots as someone else does to enjoy going to church.[/QUOTE] you literally just compared sexual harassment (something with a victim) to real dolls and church (something with no victim) what are you doing

"odd" yes, running dozens of jailbait subreddits and creepshots is "odd" freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from accountability.

[url]http://gawker.com/upskirt/[/url] Lol gawker.

[QUOTE=Dori;38076449]you literally just compared sexual harassment (something with a victim) to real dolls and church (something with no victim) what are you doing[/QUOTE] Church and no victims? I can understand dolls but Church?