If WiFi is dangerous at less than one watt, then that means that the microwave ovens (at 1000-5000 times the power) should have destroyed all human civilization now, surely.
Not to mention FM radio broadcast, at 1000-1500 watts from the transmitter tower.
and walkie-talkies put out up to 5 watts apiece.
and police radios can up to 100 watts or so from their car units.
and cell phones (the ~2 or so watts from the phone plus the 200 or so from the towers)
and AM Radio (that has been around since the 1930's)
and shortwave radio (that has also been around since the 1930's)
and military radios
and broadcast TV at 1500 or so watts
and radars (weather, airport, airplane, military, marine, etc.)
and satellite communications on a myriad of frequencies and power levels
and Weather Radio broadcast
and I can go on and on
WiFi is barely even a real signal, it is [I]ridiculously[/I] weak in comparison to the above.
American Academy of Environmental Medicine, e..g American doctors and physicians has issued a position paper that wireless devices in our homes and the radiation of smart meters and mobile phone antennas is detrimental to our health. And the research that reports this is cited.
This is not a call to give up electricity or the electrical devices that we use. The important thing here is to use moderation and to live a lifestyle that minimizes exposure to protect yourselves and your families.
Michael Schwaebe, PE, BBEC
The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) today issued a position paper on “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Field Effect on Human Health,” including wireless technologies and smart meters.
Today’s report on electromagnetic fields takes a strong stand that society must acknowledge the biological effects of electromagnetic fields, educate the population about the risks from wireless technologies, and develop safer technologies. The group, AAEM, is an international association of physicians and professionals that has been dedicated to expanding the knowledge of human health in relationship to the environment since 1965. They have been first to recognize many conditions, including Gulf War Syndrome, chemical sensitivity and the role of mold in the development of systemic illness.
In its new report, “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health,” AAEM is calling for:
1. An immediate caution on Smart Meter installation due to potentially harmful RF exposure.
2. Accommodation for health considerations regarding EMF and RF exposure, including exposure to wireless Smart Meter technology.
3. Independent studies to further understand the health effects from EMF and RF exposure.
4. Recognition that electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a growing problem worldwide.
5. Understanding and control of this electrical environmental bombardment for the protection of society.
6. Consideration and independent research regarding the quantum effects of EMF and RF on human health.
7. Use of safer technology, including for Smart Meters, such as hard-wiring, fiber optics or other non-harmful methods of data transmission.
The new position paper from the American Academy of Environmental Medicine comes on the heels of AAEM’s letter to the California Public Utilities Commission in January 2012.
12 Highlights from The Science
In the AAEM paper, “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health”, selected highlights of the science showing biological effects from electromagnetic fields included:
• “Multiple studies correlate RF exposure with diseases such as cancer, neurological disease, reproductive disorders, immune dysfunction, and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
• “Many in vitro, in vivo and epidemiological studies demonstrate that significant harmful biological effects occur from non-thermal RF exposure and satisfy Hill’s criteria of causality.3
• “Genetic damage, reproductive defects, cancer, neurological degeneration and nervous system dysfunction, immune system dysfunction, cognitive effects, protein and peptide damage, kidney damage, and developmental effects have all been reported in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.
• “Genotoxic effects from RF exposure, including studies of non-thermal levels of exposure, consistently and specifically show chromosomal instability, altered gene expression, gene mutations, DNA fragmentation and DNA structural breaks.4-11
• “Genotoxic effects are documented to occur in neurons, blood lymphocytes, sperm, red blood cells, epithelial cells, hematopoietic tissue, lung cells and bone marrow. Adverse developmental effects due to non-thermal RF exposure have been shown with decreased litter size in mice from RF exposure well below safety standards.12
• “The fact that RF exposure causes neurological damage has been documented repeatedly. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability and oxidative damage, which are associated with brain cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, have been found.4,7,15-17
• “Changes associated with degenerative neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) have been reported.4,10
• “Other neurological and cognitive disorders such as headaches, dizziness, tremors, decreased memory and attention, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, decreased reaction times, sleep disturbances and visual disruption have been reported to be statistically significant in multiple epidemiological studies with RF exposure occurring non-locally.18-21
• “Nephrotoxic effects from RF exposure also have been reported.
• “RF emissions have also been shown to cause isomeric changes in amino acids that can result in nephrotoxicity as well as hepatotoxicity.25
• “Electromagnetic field (EMF) hypersensitivity has been documented in controlled and double blind studies with exposure to various EMF frequencies.
• “Although these studies clearly show causality and disprove the claim that health effects from RF exposure are uncertain, there is another mechanism that proves electromagnetic frequencies, including radiofrequencies, can negatively impact human health. Government agencies and industry set safety standards based on the narrow scope of Newtonian or “classical” physics reasoning that the effects of atoms and molecules are confined in space and time. This model supports the theory that a mechanical force acts on a physical object and thus, long-range exposure to EMF and RF cannot have an impact on health if no significant heating occurs. However, this is an incomplete model. A quantum physics model is necessary to fully understand and appreciate how and why EMF and RF fields are harmful to humans.26,27”
The AAEM position paper concludes:
“These EMF and RF quantum field effects have not been adequately studied and are not fully understood regarding human health. Because of the well documented studies showing adverse effects on health and the not fully understood quantum field effect, AAEM calls for exercising precaution with regard to EMF, RF and general frequency exposure. In an era of when all society relies on the benefits of electronics, we must find ideas and technologies that do not disturb bodily function.”
For over 50 years, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has been studying and treating the effects of the environment on human health. AAEM co-sponsored ElectromagneticHealth.org’s program on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco in 2010, along with Citizens for Health, and endorsed the book, “Public Health SOS: The Shadow Side of the Wireless Revolution”, sent to Congress in 2009, co-authored by Camilla Rees, MBA and Magda Havas, PhD.
READ MORE HERE:
[url]http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/aaem-report/[/url]
Read Full Position Paper from the American Academy of Environmental Medicine here (PDF) – “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health”
AAEM Press Release (PDF)
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]words[/QUOTE]
welcome to fp
Reminds me of this one lady i met who treated her cellphone like a deathtrap. She kept it far in the back of her house and only touched it when she really needed to. She was pretty nutty.
they an human bengs and deservd to live
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]American Academy of Environmental Medicine, e..g American doctors and physicians has issued a position paper that wireless devices in our homes and the radiation of smart meters and mobile phone antennas is detrimental to our health. And the research that reports this is cited.[/quote]
Yeah, cited by the same source who published it, you dolt.
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]This is not a call to give up electricity or the electrical devices that we use.[/quote]
Kind of a shame, because all electrical appliances emit some sort of electromagnetic radiation.
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]The important thing here is to use moderation and to live a lifestyle that minimizes exposure to protect yourselves and your families.[/quote]
Tough shit, unless you live in the middle of nowhere you're probably close to a source of electromagnetic radiation. Shit, some places on earth even have a [b]larger[/b] amount of background radiation.
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) today issued a position paper on “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Field Effect on Human Health,” including wireless technologies and smart meters.[/quote]
"The American Academy of Environmental Medicine". The only citations I found of them are ones that they themselves use, or ones completely unrelated to their points.
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]Today’s report on electromagnetic fields takes a strong stand that society must acknowledge the biological effects of electromagnetic fields, educate the population about the risks from wireless technologies, and develop safer technologies.[/quote]
Alright, lets look at this.
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]In its new report, “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health,” AAEM is calling for:
1. An immediate caution on Smart Meter installation due to potentially harmful RF exposure.
2. Accommodation for health considerations regarding EMF and RF exposure, including exposure to wireless Smart Meter technology.
3. Independent studies to further understand the health effects from EMF and RF exposure.
4. Recognition that electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a growing problem worldwide.
5. Understanding and control of this electrical environmental bombardment for the protection of society.
6. Consideration and independent research regarding the quantum effects of EMF and RF on human health.
7. Use of safer technology, including for Smart Meters, such as hard-wiring, fiber optics or other non-harmful methods of data transmission.[/quote]
Ugh... Well, do they at least have proper sources?
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]12 Highlights from The Science
In the AAEM paper, “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health”, selected highlights of the science showing biological effects from electromagnetic fields included:
• “Multiple studies correlate RF exposure with diseases such as cancer, neurological disease, reproductive disorders, immune dysfunction, and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
• “Many in vitro, in vivo and epidemiological studies demonstrate that significant harmful biological effects occur from non-thermal RF exposure and satisfy Hill’s criteria of causality.3
• “Genetic damage, reproductive defects, cancer, neurological degeneration and nervous system dysfunction, immune system dysfunction, cognitive effects, protein and peptide damage, kidney damage, and developmental effects have all been reported in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.
• “Genotoxic effects from RF exposure, including studies of non-thermal levels of exposure, consistently and specifically show chromosomal instability, altered gene expression, gene mutations, DNA fragmentation and DNA structural breaks.4-11
• “Genotoxic effects are documented to occur in neurons, blood lymphocytes, sperm, red blood cells, epithelial cells, hematopoietic tissue, lung cells and bone marrow. Adverse developmental effects due to non-thermal RF exposure have been shown with decreased litter size in mice from RF exposure well below safety standards.12
• “The fact that RF exposure causes neurological damage has been documented repeatedly. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability and oxidative damage, which are associated with brain cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, have been found.4,7,15-17
• “Changes associated with degenerative neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) have been reported.4,10
• “Other neurological and cognitive disorders such as headaches, dizziness, tremors, decreased memory and attention, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, decreased reaction times, sleep disturbances and visual disruption have been reported to be statistically significant in multiple epidemiological studies with RF exposure occurring non-locally.18-21
• “Nephrotoxic effects from RF exposure also have been reported.
• “RF emissions have also been shown to cause isomeric changes in amino acids that can result in nephrotoxicity as well as hepatotoxicity.25
• “Electromagnetic field (EMF) hypersensitivity has been documented in controlled and double blind studies with exposure to various EMF frequencies.
• “Although these studies clearly show causality and disprove the claim that health effects from RF exposure are uncertain, there is another mechanism that proves electromagnetic frequencies, including radiofrequencies, can negatively impact human health. Government agencies and industry set safety standards based on the narrow scope of Newtonian or “classical” physics reasoning that the effects of atoms and molecules are confined in space and time. This model supports the theory that a mechanical force acts on a physical object and thus, long-range exposure to EMF and RF cannot have an impact on health if no significant heating occurs. However, this is an incomplete model. A quantum physics model is necessary to fully understand and appreciate how and why EMF and RF fields are harmful to humans.26,27”[/quote]
Nope. All of the sources they cite are either associated with themselves or not recognized by any of the mainstream scientific community.
I saw one study that claimed to find a correlation between magnetic fields and DNA breakdown in rats. It didn't mention the rate of breakdown before and after the induced magnetic field, nor did it indicate if it lies within the margin of error for the test.
The article they give here-http://aaemonline.org/emf_rf_position.html Itself provides a report (the first source cited, in fact) that claims, and I quote-
"To date, scientific studies have not identified or confirmed negative health effects from potential non thermal impacts of RF emission such as those produced by existing household electronic devices and smart meters."
They also fail to find and provide a single explanation as to how non-ionizing radiation harms the human body.
[QUOTE=MJSchwaebe;36740511]The AAEM position paper concludes:
“These EMF and RF quantum field effects have not been adequately studied and are not fully understood regarding human health. Because of the well documented studies showing adverse effects on health and the not fully understood quantum field effect, AAEM calls for exercising precaution with regard to EMF, RF and general frequency exposure. In an era of when all society relies on the benefits of electronics, we must find ideas and technologies that do not disturb bodily function.”
For over 50 years, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has been studying and treating the effects of the environment on human health. AAEM co-sponsored ElectromagneticHealth.org’s program on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco in 2010, along with Citizens for Health, and endorsed the book, “Public Health SOS: The Shadow Side of the Wireless Revolution”, sent to Congress in 2009, co-authored by Camilla Rees, MBA and Magda Havas, PhD.
READ MORE HERE:
[url]http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/aaem-report/[/url]
Read Full Position Paper from the American Academy of Environmental Medicine here (PDF) – “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health”
AAEM Press Release (PDF)[/QUOTE]
Bla bla bla, mentioning quantum fields without any context to sound smart, bla bla, send letter to congress, more bullshit from the website aaaand that's about it.
[QUOTE=Informed;36595627][editline]2nd July 2012[/editline]
Just sent a copy of your link and your post to me to the secret service, the fbi, police dept. and they said they will take it from here. in other words, you're just a hired killer. what kind of total scum are you?[/QUOTE]
Someone just discovered the internet and doesn't know what a joke is I see.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
