• Ecuador offers WikiLeak's founder Assange residency, no questions asked
    80 replies, posted
He is guilty of espionage and if only he was a us citizen, he would be guilty of treason. Killing him might be a little harsh, but it would probably do the us good.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];26458373']He is guilty of espionage and if only he was a us citizen, he would be guilty of treason.[/QUOTE] Oh, okay, lets see how many people in the government are alone responsible for espionage, shall we? Lets have a good look see. And we can, because his organization(Which he does almost no data mining for at all) releases it to the public. It harms no one, and allows transparency of the government. You're against this? You're fucking stupid. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] You don't even know the fucking meaning of the word terrorist you dolt. Nor do you understand the concept of treason.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];26458310']The army should go to where he is and shoot him. He might as well be a terrorist.[/QUOTE] I was going to be snarky and post a definition of "terrorism" but then I thought about it and I hope he [i]is[/i] branded a terrorist, that automatically nullifies any sort of efficient or effective American response.
"Convey information with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the armed forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies. This was punishable by death or by imprisonment for not more than 30 years or both." He has stated before he wants to harm the us in its wars. He is breaking the law and should be punished and stopped.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];26458373']He is guilty of espionage and if only he was a us citizen, he would be guilty of treason. Killing him might be a little harsh, but it would probably do the us good.[/QUOTE] Do the US good? What the FUCK are you on? Transparency for the government at no cost to life is BAD for the US? You need to learn what the fuck you're talking about man. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE='[sluggo];26458458']"Convey information with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the armed forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies. This was punishable by death or by imprisonment for not more than 30 years or both." He has stated before he wants to harm the us in its wars. He is breaking the law and should be punished and stopped.[/QUOTE] You better be fucking trolling if you think stopping the US from having wars that have no purpose but to make the US money and kill american soldiers pointlessly, is a terrorist or treasonous act. God, the logic you must have must be so fucking circular.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;26458472]Do the US good? What the FUCK are you on? Transparency for the government at no cost to life is BAD for the US? You need to learn what the fuck you're talking about man. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Yes, transparency of government is good, but not when it is: Harming USA diplomatic operations Revealing information to our enemies And has the purpose of harming us. Do you want the USA to fail? You better be fucking trolling if you think stopping the US from having wars that have no purpose but to make the US money and kill american soldiers pointlessly, is a terrorist or treasonous act. God, the logic you must have must be so fucking circular.[/QUOTE] [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Sorry I edited your post accidentally.
The US should be the country that offers asylum (if that's the right word) to people in Assange's position.
Do I want the US to fail? No, but I'm not american, and to be honest, you're a retard if you think that US government transparency will harm them. Conservative :downs: [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Free country? Yeah fucking right.
I am a conservative. So what. Look at the midterm election results. So are allot of people.
So? Your argument seems to be that any sort of leak is going to cause the downfall of the US when that is clearly not the case. Not only that, you seem to think his death is a good thing, or at the very least, not a bad thing. When his death would really be quite a fucking tragedy when you consider that he's the only thing that scares a government like he is. Nothing is fucking bad about that when the government in question SHOULD NOT BE SO FUCKING OPAQUE AND SECRETIVE. Tell me, please oh wise conservative, tell me how the leaks are killing people, how the leaks are harming the US. You can't, can you? No one has died. No relationship has turned sour. Nothing has happened. But yet, he deserves to die. [b]BRILLIANT FUCKING LOGIC[/b]
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;26458608]So? Your argument seems to be that any sort of leak is going to cause the downfall of the US when that is clearly not the case. Not only that, you seem to think his death is a good thing, or at the very least, not a bad thing. When his death would really be quite a fucking tragedy when you consider that he's the only thing that scares a government like he is. Nothing is fucking bad about that when the government in question SHOULD NOT BE SO FUCKING OPAQUE AND SECRETIVE. Tell me, please oh wise conservative, tell me how the leaks are killing people, how the leaks are harming the US. You can't, can you? No one has died. No relationship has turned sour. Nothing has happened. But yet, he deserves to die. [b]BRILLIANT FUCKING LOGIC[/b][/QUOTE] He has edited out names, and that is good, but he is breaking laws set down by the espionage act of 1917. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Are you an anarchist who hates laws. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Are you an anarchist who hates laws?
[QUOTE='[sluggo];26458630']He has edited out names, and that is good, but he is breaking laws set down by the espionage act of 1917. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Are you an anarchist who hates laws. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Are you an anarchist who hates laws?[/QUOTE] Hahaha fuck no. Are you a conservative that thinks the government shouldn't be outed? Yeah, you are. He's breaking laws do the right thing and save people problems? Shit, that's fucking terrible, murder him. Yeah, you're right, kill him.
Let's ignore the trolls, folks.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;26458691]Hahaha fuck no. Are you a conservative that thinks the government shouldn't be outed? Yeah, you are. He's [b] breaking laws [/b] do the right thing and save people problems? Shit, that's fucking terrible, murder him. Yeah, you're right, kill him.[/QUOTE] Breaking laws? He is a rapist! He is no Robbin Hood!
[QUOTE='[sluggo];26458728']Breaking laws? He is a rapist! He is no Robbin Hood![/QUOTE] troll
[QUOTE='[sluggo];26458630']He has edited out names, and that is good, but he is breaking laws set down by the espionage act of 1917. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Are you an anarchist who hates laws. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] Are you an anarchist who hates laws?[/QUOTE] United States World Police. [QUOTE='[sluggo];26458728']Breaking laws? He is a rapist! He is no Robbin Hood![/QUOTE] Ugh nevermind.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];26458458']"Convey information with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the armed forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies. This was punishable by death or by imprisonment for not more than 30 years or both." He has stated before he wants to harm the us in its wars. He is breaking the law and should be punished and stopped.[/QUOTE] Your avatar conveys who you are not.
I am a troll for expressing my what i think. I thought you believed in freedom of speech?
[QUOTE='[sluggo];26458834']I am a troll for expressing my what i think. I thought you believed in freedom of speech?[/QUOTE] You're not a troll for what you're saying, you're a troll for not knowing fairly common and reasonable shit, or just totally disregarding it in order to start shit, like you did here for all of 10 minutes.
[QUOTE=finbe;26458830]Your avatar conveys who you are not.[/QUOTE] What! I am not smart because i agree with 57% of America? I think you are the unintellectual one here. [editline]2nd December 2010[/editline] 57% of America agrees with me! Including the president of the USA (even though I generally disagree with him).
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.