Jessi Slaughter thread (Post new ones = get banned)
1,633 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Doomish;23528751]While that may be true, I'd always assumed the general rule of being a mod was that people had to be DOING SOMETHING WRONG to be banned.[/QUOTE]
I always thought mods to be like internet police, banning people in the wrong.
I agree with your statement.
[QUOTE=WickedIcon;23528805]Obviously I'm not a moderator, but personally I think the better way of handling this would have been to come in early on and warn us that anyone advocating raiding was going to get perma'd.
Alternately, you could have DDT'd the thread, DDT'd the other thread(s) about this, and posted a sticky saying we don't want that kind of shit on here.
Permabanning people because you don't like them just makes you look like a bad moderator.
Also, personal bit of snark: I love how this thread gets easily over 20 permabans but you do absolutely nothing about the constant flamewars caused by Glaber and his ilk.[/QUOTE]
This man has a very good point.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;23528785]And this is why a lot of the forum thinks your a dick and compares you to Greeman, whether they openly say it or not.. Because you're not fair and do shit because you think it's funny, or think it's right in that skewed mind of yours. If you're like this on the internet, i'd hate to meet you in real life.[/QUOTE]
Come on, I'm not insulting you. You don't need to insult me.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;23528785]As Doomish said, part of the point in being a mod was to ban people for doing something wrong, like posting Shock Images. Not banning because you disagree with them.[/QUOTE]
I don't ban people because I disagree with them. Case in point: I disagree with you right now. I disagree with Glaber and Scorpious about most things and they're not banned.
[QUOTE=Doomish;23528840]so you missed the part where people were still laughing at 'ya done goofed' then
IE the image I posted earlier:
[img]http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/350/steamti.png[/img]
Nobody is laughing at the fact that Jessi may or may not be dead, nor are they laughing at the fact that 4Chan's raids were "successful" or whatever, they're laughing at the dad pretending to know what he was talking about, and people will CONTINUE to laugh at it regardless of who you unfairly permaban for it.[/QUOTE]
But he was defending his daughter. How would you feel if your 11 year old kid was being Cyber Bullied.
[b]Doomish, stop reposting that and tell Dr. Whoever to use the Refugee Camp[/b]
[QUOTE=TH89;23528910]Come on, I'm not insulting you. You don't need to insult me.
I don't ban people because I disagree with them. Case in point: I disagree with you right now. I disagree with Glaber and Scorpious about most things and they're not banned.[/QUOTE]
I'm not insulting you, i'm being honest.
Even if you don't disagree with them, the point still stands that the bans were unfair.
[QUOTE=TH89;23528930][b]Doomish, stop reposting that and tell Dr. Whoever to use the Refugee Camp[/b][/QUOTE]
From what i've seen, a lot of the people that use the Ref Camp (me included in one case) get perma'd or extended bans.
Besides, he's not reposting it, people are just quoting it.
-snip, that was a really poorly worded post-
I agree that a notice of sorts would send a stronger message, even if in addition to the permas. Something in GD or some other high-traffic forum making clear to members and visitors alike that shit like this isn't allowed or tolerated.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;23528961]From what i've seen, a lot of the people that use the Ref Camp (me included in one case) get perma'd or extended bans.
Besides, he's not reposting it, people are just quoting it.[/QUOTE]
If you act like a dipshit in the RC, you'll get perma'd.
Why is 4chan user a bannable offense but using the "XD" face isn't?
Well if he has logged out or lost connection like i did when i was banned last i could not log in cause of LOLOOLOLOL UR IP HAS BEEN BANNED U CANNOT DISPUTE FAGGOT(not calling anyone one)
Edit i mean the columbian rape one.
[QUOTE=WickedIcon;23528991]-snip, that was a really poorly worded post-[/QUOTE]
He posts his political opinion. While others disagree, there's nothing wrong with posting what he does.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;23528961]I'm not insulting you, i'm being honest.
Even if you don't disagree with them, the point still stands that the bans were unfair.[/QUOTE]
Are you a mod? No? Try not to strain yourself with this issue, unfair is subjective, a mod says it's perma worthy, it's perma worthy unless a higher power overturns it.
[QUOTE=Lemonator;23529015]Why is 4chan user a bannable offense but using the "XD" face isn't?[/QUOTE]
It's an expression of laughter.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;23528961]Even if you don't disagree with them, the point still stands that the bans were unfair.[/QUOTE]
I already asked this and didn't really get an answer, so I'll ask again: how do you define fairness? Why should all bans be fair?
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;23528961]From what i've seen, a lot of the people that use the Ref Camp (me included in one case) get perma'd or extended bans.[/QUOTE]
People get extended bans for acting belligerent or spamming. Simply disputing your ban is perfectly fine, although it doesn't mean you're guaranteed a reduce.
[QUOTE=TH89;23528930][b]Doomish, stop reposting that and tell Dr. Whoever to use the Refugee Camp[/b][/QUOTE]
Alright, I told him, but my point still stands. He wasn't doing anything wrong, nor were most of the other people you banned. Laughing at the low points of the issue is different than flat out making fun of the parts [I]you[/I] think people shouldn't be laughing at.
[QUOTE=Panda X;23529046]It's an expression of laughter.[/QUOTE]
An expression of the retarded
[editline]10:41[/editline]
And here in Nazi Germany we don't like the retarded
poor kid
4chan went way too far
[QUOTE=Panda X;23529024]He posts his political opinion. While others disagree, there's nothing wrong with posting what he does.[/QUOTE]
I snipped that for a reason, but anyways, the reason why Glaber is breaking the rules is because he uses his threads as an excuse to act like a self-righteous prick, not to mention that nearly all of said threads cause rather... un-civil disagreements. Glaber should be banned, and that would be an example of good moderation on TH89 or whoever's part.
Scorpius, on the other hand, is civil and states his points eloquently instead of just insulting us for being filthy liberals.
[QUOTE=Left4Meds2;23529078]An expression of the retarded[/QUOTE]
If that's true that lol, lmao, lmfao, rofl and "I found this to be quite humorous and I enjoyed it" are also an expression of the retarded seeing how they all mean the same thing.
[QUOTE=Kilr;23529030]Are you a mod? No? Try not to strain yourself with this issue, unfair is subjective, a mod says it's perma worthy, it's perma worthy unless a higher power overturns it.[/QUOTE]
QFT. Like I said, forums are not a democracy. Hell, it's even stated in the FP rule list...
Also, DeVotchKa doesn't have to hang out with me but I think I'm a pretty cool dude
[img]http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs022.snc3/10951_1163008556895_1278270167_30452614_104223_n.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=TH89;23529061]I already asked this and didn't really get an answer, so I'll ask again: how do you define fairness? Why should all bans be fair?[/QUOTE]
A ban is fair if the offense is obvious and if the offending party could have reasonably known he was going to be banned for it.
If a temporary ban is unfair, neither I nor anyone else will get bent out of shape about it, because it's just that: temporary. However, permabans should be fair because they prevent the person affected from being able to learn from their error, and it'll probably end up being better for Facepunch's image as a company if users aren't treading on thin ice from the second they sign up.
That's my opinion, anyways, and I get the feeling more than a few people are going to agree with me.
[QUOTE=TH89;23529134]Also, DeVotchKa doesn't have to hang out with me but I think I'm a pretty cool dude
[IMG]http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs022.snc3/10951_1163008556895_1278270167_30452614_104223_n.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
You the one with the glasses?
I found it odd that the news article spoke of 4chan and anon as if they know what/who they are, yet they censored penis.
[QUOTE=Left4Meds2;23529078]An expression of the retarded
[editline]10:41[/editline]
And here in Nazi Germany we don't like the retarded[/QUOTE]
nice post XD
[QUOTE=ohadje;23511837]Poor girl... At first I thought it will just fade away, but it didn't. Also, I sent her a messege to delete her Youtube acount and she listened :)[/QUOTE]
Yeah because I'm sure she saw that one message in the 10,000 she probably received every day
[QUOTE=WickedIcon;23529145]A ban is fair if the offense is obvious and if the offending party could have reasonably known he was going to be banned for it.
If a temporary ban is unfair, neither I nor anyone else will get bent out of shape about it, because it's just that: temporary. However, permabans should be fair because they prevent the person affected from being able to learn from their error, and it'll probably end up being better for Facepunch's image as a company if users aren't treading on thin ice from the second they sign up.
That's my opinion, anyways, and I get the feeling more than a few people are going to agree with me.[/QUOTE]
I'm sure they will.
But why do you assume we are in the business of rehabilitating people? If we don't like someone, why is it wrong for us to bar them from posting on our website?
[editline]03:47AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=doommarine23;23529146]You the one with the glasses?[/QUOTE]
I'm the lebanese girl
[QUOTE=TH89;23529061]I already asked this and didn't really get an answer, so I'll ask again: how do you define fairness? Why should all bans be fair?
People get extended bans for acting belligerent or spamming. Simply disputing your ban is perfectly fine, although it doesn't mean you're guaranteed a reduce.[/QUOTE]
Should i really have to? You should've been touch what was fair and unfair, right and wrong, ages ago. Besides, even if you didn't Wicked did a good job.
TH89 permabanned yuki in Jessi Slaughter has killed herself? The latest rumour in an unsavoury tale of trolling Re with the reason “Advocating raiding”
YES YES YES YES YES
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.