Just checked again(don't ask, just curious), and that uploader Deetee has more.
It's good to know Wikipedia.xxx exists now.
Best site:
[url]http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:GIF_videos_of_male_masturbation&oldid=67780152[/url]
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;36136624][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Anal_Fisting.jpg[/url]
yyyeeeaaahhh[/QUOTE]
Okay, there's a few exceptions to the colored illustrations. Most of them are illustrations, though.
And those that are not illustrations are still not trying to be sexually stimulating.
[QUOTE=Gmod4ever;36136980]Okay, there's a few exceptions to the colored illustrations. Most of them are illustrations, though.
And those that are not illustrations are still not trying to be sexually stimulating.[/QUOTE]
Ironically, if you look hard enough you can find images of women uploaded by said women quite obviously for the purposes of exciting people. See [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Poolside_03.jpg]this piece of work[/url] (don't worry, it's more pleasing on the eyes than the last I posted) by user Hanna Apple. Her user page has since been deleted but if I recall correctly her user page consisted only of the text "anyone up for some hot apple pie?..." Her talk page consisted of men flirting with her.
The best part? The images remain, and the good old boys of Wikipedia still use them to illustrate articles- see [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mons pubis]Mons Pubis.[/url].
[QUOTE=Niklas;36136506]Wikipedia... (Very NSFW)
[url]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Perianalabszess_01.jpg[/url][/QUOTE]
for the love of god
Wikipedia doesn't have a porn problem, parents who shelter their kids from reality has a problem.
Edit
Although I somewhat agree that there should be a filter for the more, uh, hardcore stuff.
I think the main problem is it could potentially come up if you clicked "Random article" on the side.
Unless Wikipedia has enough in place to prevent that (don't randomly show articles from the category "Adult"), I think the fact that they have it is a problem for schools etc. Set it to not select adult articles when you click random and I'll be fine, especially if you allow logged-in users to say they're OK with seeing adult articles.
What if a kid searched pearl necklace?
[QUOTE=Sir_takeslot;36136154][img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/Wiki-facial.png/220px-Wiki-facial.png[/img]
10/10 would fap again[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DesolateGrun;36136170]Dude my mini encyclopedia from the fourth grade had tits in it
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/60/Wiki-mam-intcs.png/220px-Wiki-mam-intcs.png[/img]
So tit fucking is a step up[/QUOTE]
10/10, would research these on Wikipedia again.
Do these have a source?
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seedfeeder[/url], did all the similarly designed ones
[QUOTE=DesolateGrun;36137622][IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Wiki-gokkun.png[/IMG]
Why[/QUOTE]
Calcium or protein, depending how sinister the picture is.
It is Gokkun, which formed a distinct porn genre in Japan to get around the censors. In that way, among others, it is similar to bukkake, though more obscure.
"Gokkun" means "gulp".
reminder: Don't look up on this while in school.
[QUOTE=Killuah;36136820]Best site:
[url]http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:GIF_videos_of_male_masturbation&oldid=67780152[/url][/QUOTE]
Why would they have a .gif of meatspin under masturbation?
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/Masturbation_Techniques_-_swinging_cock_%28animated%29.gif/120px-Masturbation_Techniques_-_swinging_cock_%28animated%29.gif[/img]
This is great.
[h2]WHY DO I KEEP CLICKING THE FUCKING LINKS[/h2]
This is how you start a fire [sp]in your urethra[/sp].
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/Masturbation_Techniques_-_the_campfire_method_%28animated%29.gif/120px-Masturbation_Techniques_-_the_campfire_method_%28animated%29.gif[/img]
I'm now searching for porn on Wikipedia because this stuff is fucking funny.
Well done Facepunch.
Jesus christ man
[QUOTE=lavacano;36137273]I think the main problem is it could potentially come up if you clicked "Random article" on the side.
Unless Wikipedia has enough in place to prevent that (don't randomly show articles from the category "Adult"), I think the fact that they have it is a problem for schools etc. Set it to not select adult articles when you click random and I'll be fine, especially if you allow logged-in users to say they're OK with seeing adult articles.[/QUOTE]
Random Page will not take you to any article which may be deemed offensive.
[QUOTE=Coffee;36137950]Random Page will not take you to any article which may be deemed offensive.[/QUOTE]
then i have no problems with there being porn on Wikipedia
[QUOTE=Polyethylene;36137825][img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/Masturbation_Techniques_-_swinging_cock_%28animated%29.gif/120px-Masturbation_Techniques_-_swinging_cock_%28animated%29.gif[/img]
This is great.[/QUOTE]
I'm only here for the techniques.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Masturbation_Techniques_-_the_cock_swinging_method_%28animated%29.gif/120px-Masturbation_Techniques_-_the_cock_swinging_method_%28animated%29.gif[/img]
Another thing is that parents shouldn't be annoyed by this, any decent parent with any brains will just get a parental control tool for their kids' computer. It'll simply pick up on the bad words and block pages accordingly. Schools usually have the same system if they're any good.
Of course you then fall into the ethical argument of "parents shouldn't be doing this", but I'm fine with a blocker being in place for a child if they've not started puberty yet. But as soon as they're 10/11/12, they should be let off the leash to discover the full wonders of the Internet.
And if parents are too technologically impaired to understand parental control software, they should seek the correct educational information on how to do so.
Children aren't even going to find it accidentally unless if they're looking for that exact content. I know I wouldn't since Wikipedia is filled with a vast amount of articles unrelated to pornography.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ejaculation_Educational_Demonstration.OGG[/url]
This is a great one to disguise and send to people. Hand-free ejaculate.
[QUOTE=Thlis;36136438]1920s German scat pornography.
Wikipedia just taught me that the internet has nothing to do with inspiring fetishes.[/QUOTE]
Fixed it for you.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
