[QUOTE=dass;36136442]I had to show that page to a friend of mine when she didn't knew what tit fucking was. (we have a different term for it, involving spanish)[/QUOTE]
Was it "cubana"?
"TIMMY, ARE YOU WATCHING PORN?!?"
"No mom, I'm just browsing wikipedia" :v:
And now Wikipedia has everything...
[url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Wiki-pegging.png][img]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fe/Wiki-pegging.png/220px-Wiki-pegging.png[/img][/url]
[QUOTE=The golden;36145560]On the article about the human anus, there is a picture of a female one and a male one. The female one gets taken down often and then put back up but the male one always remains. The history said "removed upon request"
So if it's a female it becomes pornography and is unsuitable for viewing -but if it's a male it's ok? Wtf.[/QUOTE]
Couldn't they just crop the picture more so you can't tell?
[QUOTE=Archimedes;36136343]It's honestly probably better if a young teen/child searches Wikipedia in hopes of finding sexually suggestive content rather than the rest of the internet. It at least gives them some basic point of reference and they're more likely to at least ease into it instead of being confronted with tons of dodgy virus filled porn sites.
Unless the parent(s) have some specific block in place on the rest of the internet it's pretty unlikely they can keep their kid from being exposed to sexual content, one way or another.[/QUOTE]
Agreed. In most of the "Wiki porn" pages there's information regarding STD's and other risks. Maybe it would scare the hell out of some kids and keep them at least somewhat chaste; if not then at least they'll use protection.
[QUOTE=CoolKingKaso;36138243]Children aren't even going to find it accidentally unless if they're looking for that exact content. I know I wouldn't since Wikipedia is filled with a vast amount of articles unrelated to pornography.[/QUOTE]
Honestly? I didn't even know Wikipedia had porn on it until this thread.
I didn't know they even had pron until just now.
Christ, some of this stuff is hilarious.
[QUOTE=Penultimate;36146430]Honestly? I didn't even know Wikipedia had porn on it until this thread.[/QUOTE]
I've known for so long, thanks to an immature friend of mine looking at it in a school computer lab years ago. I think he ended up getting permabanned from the school's computers for trying to print it out.
[QUOTE=Neo Kabuto;36146463]I've known for so long, thanks to an immature friend of mine looking at it in a school computer lab years ago. I think he ended up getting permabanned from the school's computers for trying to print it out.[/QUOTE]
I found porn at school, [b]BETTER PRINT THIS SHIT OUT! HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE[/b]
Ah the good old Streisand effect. You did good, Larry Sanger, instead of shutting your mouth which would have aided your cause of not pubilicising wiki porn too much, you instead achieved the opposite.
Mister Penis thanks you.
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/2005_walking_penis.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=fenwick;36139010]have fun:
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Bad_image_list[/url]
[/QUOTE]
Well let's take a look at this list...
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/Young-Woman-Urination.jpg/794px-Young-Woman-Urination.jpg[/t]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Semfac01.png[/t]
Haha Wikipedia you host some funny--
[highlight]NSFW x1,000,000,000:[/highlight]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RecurrentbreastCA1.gif[/url]
I can never experience a boner ever again.
[QUOTE=Ninja Duck;36146970][highlight]NSFW x1,000,000,000:[/highlight]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RecurrentbreastCA1.gif[/url][/QUOTE]
Oh my
[QUOTE=Ninja Duck;36146970]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Semfac01.png[/t][/QUOTE]
Not gonna lie, but she doesn't look like she is enjoying that...
I found something that might interest Wikipedia
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/68/Fuck_off_Wikipedia.jpg/1280px-Fuck_off_Wikipedia.jpg[/IMG]
Not the most relevant...
Why am i evening clicking all the links in this thread?
It's horrible.
Why does this matter? The child blocks work on wikipedia too so if you set up a porn block it prevents them from even looking at a page that mentions it as a link. If I remember correctly from my childhood and the 500 blocks we had on the internet at my house.
[QUOTE=errington07;36136487][url]http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dede_Cucumber_0433.jpg[/url]
Oh deary me.[/QUOTE]
The look on her face is pretty scary
[QUOTE=Niklas;36136506]Wikipedia... (Very NSFW)
[url]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Perianalabszess_01.jpg[/url][/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;wr9KWbazgso]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr9KWbazgso[/video]
[QUOTE=abcpea2;36141411][IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Pissing-illustration.jpg[/IMG]
this is my favourite image[/QUOTE]
Found this under one of the sources they cited regarding pornographic depictions of Marie Antoinette in the 1780s:
[IMG]http://i46.tinypic.com/inv4fn.jpg[/IMG]
I have no idea what the fuck is going on here.
[QUOTE=Chocolate.;36138884]
-Cucumber insertion-
Nice.[/QUOTE]
Haha she looks a bit like Hillary Clinton.
The worst of them all
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Silentduck.jpg[/img]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Silentduck.jpg[/url]
This thread is full of the strangest boners i've ever had.
[QUOTE=Jorori;36143215]Was it "cubana"?[/QUOTE]
Nope, "espanholada" or at least we call it that here.
On an unrelated note, I always got the idea of tit fucknig the wrong way, and never pictured her coming from under me by the front, clamping my dick between her boobs. I always thought of it as she lying down on her back and doing the same thing but on top of her, which is awkward and unconfortable.
Being a virgin sucks...
[QUOTE=phytocide;36141436][QUOTE=abcpea2;36141411][IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Pissing-illustration.jpg[/IMG]
this is my favourite image[/QUOTE]
uggghh nng i just came on sight from seeing that image[/QUOTE]
oh god, tell me about it...
[IMG]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/anatomy_text.png[/IMG]
[I]For many of the anatomy pictures on Wikipedia, I think this is actually not far from reality. They only look all formal and professional due to careful cropping.[/I]
[QUOTE=LunchboxOfDoom;36149811]Found this under one of the sources they cited regarding pornographic depictions of Marie Antoinette in the 1780s:
[IMG]http://i46.tinypic.com/inv4fn.jpg[/IMG]
I have no idea what the fuck is going on here.[/QUOTE]
penostrich
[QUOTE=Klammyxxl;36166742]Um...
[url]http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shanon_Cucumber_0415.jpg[/url]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bukkake_in_blowbang_illustration.jpg[/url]
:tinfoil:[/QUOTE]
Sweet Jesus, Wikipedia really does have a porn problem.
This is hilarious
Out of curiosity, is anyone else seeing a man ejaculating when they look at the Wiki page for Prince Edward? Or have I just gone mental?
[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Edward,_Earl_of_Wessex"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Edward,_Earl_of_Wessex
[/URL]Seems they fixed it. Just compare the last two revisions in the history if you want to see what it did.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
