Trump says Sprint, OneWeb to create 8,000 U.S. jobs [REAL NEWS, WONDERFUL AMAZING REAL NEWS] - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Tudd;51608154]Sort of like how CNN said it was illegal for anyone to read Wikileaks for themselves. Fake news everywhere.[/QUOTE] Nah

[QUOTE=Raidyr;51608171]Nah[/QUOTE] Or that time that Obama said they would release actual proof on the Russian Hackers.

do you have a point or are you just trying to change the subject from trump blatantly lying again

[QUOTE=Tudd;51608154]Sort of like how CNN said it was illegal for anyone to read Wikileaks for themselves. Fake news everywhere.[/QUOTE] All American news is garbage.

[QUOTE=Mining Bill;51608186]do you have a point or are you just trying to change the subject from trump blatantly lying again[/QUOTE] I'm trying to point out how stupid of a precedent we're setting for fake news. Basically if it misleads, even on accident or due to later retcon, it's FAKE NEWS. It's fricken Reuters like come on.

[QUOTE=Tudd;51608154]Sort of like how CNN said it was illegal for anyone to read Wikileaks for themselves. Fake news everywhere.[/QUOTE] So what's the point of this post? I'm actually curious because no one denied this lol [QUOTE=Tudd;51608195]I'm trying to point out how stupid of a precedent we're setting for fake news. Basically if it misleads, even on accident or due to later retcon, it's FAKE NEWS.[/QUOTE] so what does this have to do with CNN?

Snip

[QUOTE=Tudd;51608208]It's simply not illegal to read wikileaks and the media doesn't have special permissions of the 1st admendment to. Case close.[/QUOTE] ok but what does this have to do with this article being fake news? [editline]31st December 2016[/editline] ok so since you snipped your post i'm assuming that it means that that you don't have a point to that CNN post or trying to think of one like i genuinely don't know what you're trying to do here. i don't get the point of bringing up cnn in this argument because it's not like the mods are going to ban reuters for 1 fake news article, and if someone unironically posted that CNN article saying it's illegal to view those wikileaks articles, they would get just as chewed out (probably even more since a lot of liberals hate cnn).

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51608212]ok but what does this have to do with this article being fake news? [editline]31st December 2016[/editline] ok so since you snipped your post i'm assuming that it means that that you don't have a point to that CNN post or trying to think of one like i genuinely don't know what you're trying to do here. i don't get the point of bringing up cnn in this argument because it's not like the mods are going to ban reuters for 1 fake news article, and if someone unironically posted that CNN article saying it's illegal to view those wikileaks articles, they would get just as chewed out (probably even more since a lot of liberals hate cnn).[/QUOTE] I snipped it because I misread and thought you were referring to the legality of Wikileaks reading. I already posted my point to your question. The reason I used the CNN one for example is to show how low of a bar to what can be considered fake news now going by how this article is being labeled as such. Also I'm on a phone at a party getting some posts in here or there so forgive me for the mishap.

[QUOTE=Tudd;51608270]I already posted my point to your question. The reason I used the CNN one for example is to show how low of a bar to what can be considered fake news now going by how this article is being labeled as.[/QUOTE] And is that a problem? I'm more than fine if shit tier articles from CNN were insta-locked or at least called out for being garbage.

Did you guys not notice the silly and pernicious mod-edits throughout the entire election season? shit aint new lol and its pretty funny imo. And does saying "Trump says" not somewhat imply that he had something to do with it??? At the very least, I think you'd have to agree that he said it to reinforce in peoples heads the idea of "he's bringing back jobs already!" That is a light form of fake news

[QUOTE=thelurker1234;51608304]Did you guys not notice the silly and pernicious mod-edits throughout the entire election season? shit aint new lol and its pretty funny imo. And does saying "Trump says" not somewhat imply that he had something to do with it??? At the very least, I think you'd have to agree that he said it to reinforce in peoples heads the idea of "he's bringing back jobs already!" That is a light form of fake news[/QUOTE] It does not mean he had anything to do with it; evidence is to the contrary. Fake news is still fake news, regardless of your feelings.

[QUOTE=bitches;51609489]It does not mean he had anything to do with it; evidence is to the contrary. Fake news is still fake news, regardless of your feelings.[/QUOTE] Well yeah, I was affirming that it was fake news and how.

[QUOTE=Judas;51595259]I would rather bring back 1,000 jobs to america where we have workers rights[/QUOTE] When the Republicans start making Right-To-Work laws federal, those'll be a thing of the past.