Ubisoft: We need to stop releasing a Assassins Creed Game every year

[B_I_G__C_U_M]

I never got to play Brotherhood because it broke when my 360 overheated.
The 5th game my 360 has consumed. It's also the reason I'll never buy a non-exclusive 360 title again.

[Cl0cK]

Well, I'm glad they understood that they were making them too fast.

[crackberry]

Hopefully they won't make the same mistake as Activision.

[1nfiniteseed]

[QUOTE=wallyroberto_2;32644072]One is asia would be kind of cool, if they didn't make it super weeabo-ninja and instead went for a historically accurate approach.[/QUOTE]

Sengoku period Assassin's Creed would be amazing. But like you said, as long as it was strictly historically accurate (Or at least as far as accurate gets for AC) and not flooded with Anime crap.

[conco]

[QUOTE=stepat201;32644506]I wouldn't really call it an amazing cliffhanger, it's just [sp]The death of a totally one-note character that I'm sure no one will miss.[/sp]. At most Desmond will just be really dark and brooding in the next game (which should be really fun to watch :rolleye:).[/QUOTE]

[sp]Considering the direction most movies/games are going nowadays, Lucy will most like be revived through some means, because, as companies have shown us, god forbid we not have an active love interest[/sp]

[Wallyroberto]

[QUOTE=1nfiniteseed;32645923]Sengoku period Assassin's Creed would be amazing. But like you said, as long as it was strictly historically accurate (Or at least as far as accurate gets for AC) and not flooded with Anime crap.[/QUOTE]

Ezio-kun, am I kawaii enough?

[killerteacup]

[QUOTE=chuck14;32647658][sp]Considering the direction most movies/games are going nowadays, Lucy will most like be revived through some means, because, as companies have shown us, god forbid we not have an active love interest[/sp][/QUOTE]

[sp]We don't know if she died yet, she just got stabbed pretty brutally[/sp]

Assassins Creed is an incredibly good franchise for an ubisoft franchise, I love it but I hope they make more changes each year. That said I can't think of much they could really add.

[MachiniOs]

[QUOTE=Atlascore;32643180]Yessss.

Hopefully the next AC game (the one after Revelation) has a lot more content, Brotherhood was disappointingly short and only had a handful of new features.[/QUOTE]
I still really enjoyed it though.

[Corporal Yippie]

they said there is still lots of potential for new AC stories once Desmond's arc is over (after the 2012 world is ending game next year with him in it)

[Missing User]

[QUOTE=killerteacup;32648304][sp]We don't know if she died yet, she just got stabbed pretty brutally[/sp][/QUOTE]

[sp]That blade must be 2000 years old, she would at least have tetanus[/sp]

[MrParalegal]

I'd rather they made a new Splinter Cell.

Chaos Theory style, not Conviction style.

[mr apple]

People complain there there's nothing new in the AC games, I like the story line, that's why I play.
That badass feeling you get when you kill people in AC hasn't got tiring.

[ironman17]

Well, if they have plenty of time to develop Assassin's Creed 3, it'll probably be even greater than the previous ones, maybe even moreso than the upcoming Revelations.

Let's see; there were roughly 2 years of between Assassin's Creed 1 and 2 (shave off about a month for a closer estimate), then there was a year between 2 and Brotherhood, and currently there's been a year between Brotherhood and the upcoming Revelations. A two-year break would probably give enough time to ensure AC3 makes a big jump in terms of quality and greatness, akin to the large jump between 1 and 2.

Also, do you think Assassin's Creed 3 will be "episodic" in a similar vein to the Auditore Saga, split up into multiple segments?

Also also, I wonder what "adventures" could be had in the post-Solarocalypse world of Assassin's Creed after 2012? Perhaps trying to prevent Abstergo from unifying the shattered world under their banner, reconstructing the modern-day Assassins to construct an "army" of Assassins.