Ahmadinejad unveils new 'ambassador of death' unmanned drone bomber
184 replies, posted
Hm. Am I the only one who thinks they modeled it after the NATO MOAB?
[QUOTE=bravehat;24268594]Or Warhol :ohdear:
Dunno why that guy just grates with me, he never makes a coherent argument and backs it up, and when he can't he delves into personal attacks.
:argh: Das ees not how wan debates![/QUOTE]
I agree with you so much..
I kinda lurk the new posts and such, and i have seen that most of JDK721 posts are personal attacks cause they disagree with him.
[quote]"The jet, as well as being an [B]ambassador of death[/B] for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of [B]peace and friendship[/B]," said Ahmadinejad at the inauguration ceremony, which fell on the country's national day for its defense industries.[/quote]
hahahahahahaha
Yes JDK.
But really, insulting people who have insane/fucked views over and over and again without putting any effort in trying to correct them makes you look just as bad.
[QUOTE=booster;24264834]If the Planet was an RTS, "The Ambassador Of Death" would be Irans super weapon.[/QUOTE]
Lol, I can imagine that right now.
The Ambassador Of Death
3000 Minerals
900 Vespane
Death From Above:
Launches several hellish bombs that eradicate any forces within range.
Stealth:
Allows to get past enemy detectors.
[QUOTE=starpluck;24269954]Yes JDK.
But really, insulting people who have insane/fucked views over and over and again without putting any effort in trying to correct them makes you look just as bad.[/QUOTE]
Nothing is fucked up with my views, really.
[QUOTE=ohadje;24270274]Nothing is fucked up with my views, really.[/QUOTE]
Dude, we have finally got a news thread where you guys are not debating for fucking hours so don't say anything that might provoke him.
Please.
I can't wait to see it limp into the skies...
[QUOTE=ohadje;24270274]Nothing is fucked up with my views, really.[/QUOTE]
[sp]that wasn't the point, don't mess it up[/sp]
[QUOTE=ohadje;24270274]Nothing is fucked up with my views, really.[/QUOTE]
I laughed. You're worse than BurnEmDown (which is nearly impossible to achieve).
Geez you guys,
I'm not some wild bull about to get enraged at any moment.
[QUOTE=JDK721;24270607]I laughed. You're worse than BurnEmDown (which is nearly impossible to achieve).[/QUOTE]
Actually we have the same views, pretty much.
[QUOTE=ohadje;24270643]Actually we have the same views, pretty much.[/QUOTE]
Not really.
I respect that guy quite a lot; he's more liberal.
[QUOTE=JDK721;24270607]I laughed. You're worse than BurnEmDown (which is nearly impossible to achieve).[/QUOTE]
You skipped over every single post complaining about you shitposting to respond to just that one statement, in that way.
:sigh:
[QUOTE=starpluck;24270673]Not really.
I respect that guy quite a lot; he's more liberal.[/QUOTE]
And on what aspect am I not liberal? Have you actually seen what my views are regarding other non-Mideast topics? I would say they're liberal.
It seems like you two have a distorted view on MY opinions, and imagine I believe things I really don't. So just, to, you know, stopping wasting time, ask me my opinions on each subject you want to, and I'll answer.
[QUOTE=Neinman;24266643]It's not that threatening after seeing a picture, it looks like a WWII german V1. It also has a reported 620 miles range (which is probably a lie) and thats not far enough to hit Isreal. A radar guided minigun or anti-missile missle could rip this thing right out of the sky.[/QUOTE]
TLAMs can be blown out of the sky easily as well with their large size and slow speed if they don't fly in terrain matching mode. We just don't know enough about this new vehicle to seriously say if it's "good" or "bad". Remember the T-80 tank? Back in the early 1980s NATO and the US thought it was nothing more than an upgraded T-72.
[QUOTE=ohadje;24270705]And on what aspect am I not liberal? Have you actually seen what my views are regarding other non-Mideast topics? I would say they're liberal.[/QUOTE]
I'm talking about Israeli politics.
[QUOTE=starpluck;24270737]I'm talking about Israeli politics.[/QUOTE]
See my edit.
[img]http://a.imageshack.us/img267/8962/v1musee1.jpg[/img]
So...it is a reusable longer range V-1 buzzbomb.
From world war II.
[QUOTE=GunFox;24270872]*picture*
So...it is a reusable longer range V-1 buzzbomb.
From world war II.[/QUOTE]
lol, nice find.
"Stop wasting my time"?
Are you for serious...
I have nothing to ask and especially give you an opportunity to backpedal. I gather your views during debates.
[QUOTE=GunFox;24270872][IMG]http://a.imageshack.us/img267/8962/v1musee1.jpg[/IMG]
So...it is a reusable longer range V-1 buzzbomb.
From world war II.[/QUOTE]
At the end of the day it'll get the job done, and that's all that matters really.
Sure destroying your enemies with style is nice but I fear the cold calculating enemy more than the flashy enemy.
The cold one is less human.
Fox news claims it can carry four cruise missiles.
But everyone else suggests it can only carry roughly a 500 pound bomb. Which, given the size, makes way more sense.
And I'm not even sure it is reusable. It has to be launched from a pad like a V-1 buzz bomb. It has no landing gear that I can see. Nor a way to increase wing area and slow it's airspeed for a landing.
And frankly, it just doesn't look like it has the fuel capacity for a two way trip.
[QUOTE=GunFox;24271041]Fox news claims it can carry four cruise missiles.
But everyone else suggests it can only carry roughly a 500 pound bomb. Which, given the size, makes way more sense.
And I'm not even sure it is reusable. It has to be launched from a pad like a V-1 buzz bomb. It has no landing gear that I can see. Nor a way to increase wing area and slow it's airspeed for a landing.
And frankly, it just doesn't look like it has the fuel capacity for a two way trip.[/QUOTE]
So what happens next? Do they just purposely crash into enemy infrastructure once they're done?
[QUOTE=starpluck;24271029]"Stop wasting my time"?
Are you for serious...
I have nothing to ask and especially give you an opportunity to backpedal. I gather your views during debates.[/QUOTE]
And what's wrong with the views you have gathered so far?
What? Seriously, just ask me my opinions straight forward instead of just repeating in every thread on how I'm extremist and shit - which is completely not true.
[QUOTE=starpluck;24271073]So what happens next? Do they just purposely crash into enemy infrastructure?[/QUOTE]
That is what I'm trying to figure out.
Right now, best I can tell, is that it is a missile that, instead of simply hitting its target, it flies OVER it and drops A BOMB instead.
I guess if it was also equipped with a warhead, then you have sorta made an interesting aircraft. Hit one target and then, as you said, hit another target with the same weapon. Otherwise....what is the point?
Seriously Gunfox, you're the biggest armchair general that I've ever seen.
[QUOTE=GunFox;24271115]That is what I'm trying to figure out.
Right now, best I can tell, is that it is a missile that, instead of simply hitting its target, it flies OVER it and drops A BOMB instead.
I guess if it was also equipped with a warhead, then you have sorta made an interesting aircraft. Hit one target and then, as you said, hit another target with the same weapon. Otherwise....what is the point?[/QUOTE]
Well it's certainly a step forward into making UAV's like the US Predator drones.
[QUOTE=ohadje;24270705]And on what aspect am I not liberal? Have you actually seen what my views are regarding other non-Mideast topics? I would say they're liberal.
It seems like you two have a distorted view on MY opinions, and imagine I believe things I really don't. So just, to, you know, stopping wasting time, ask me my opinions on each subject you want to, and I'll answer.[/QUOTE]
I have to agree with him on this guys, I don't care if they're liberal or not but his views were unbiased and pretty much make sense.
[editline]08:11PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=GunFox;24271115]That is what I'm trying to figure out.
Right now, best I can tell, is that it is a missile that, instead of simply hitting its target, it flies OVER it and drops A BOMB instead.
I guess if it was also equipped with a warhead, then you have sorta made an interesting aircraft. Hit one target and then, as you said, hit another target with the same weapon. Otherwise....what is the point?[/QUOTE]
We get one picture of a flying red UAV dildo and you're already over analyzing it :P
[QUOTE=GunFox;24270872][img]http://a.imageshack.us/img267/8962/v1musee1.jpg[/img]
So...it is a reusable longer range V-1 buzzbomb.
From world war II.[/QUOTE]
Nah, that has gyroscopes n shit in it...that is all considered black sorcery in Iran...
[editline]02:15PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=JDK721;24271142]Seriously Gunfox, you're the biggest armchair general that I've ever seen.[/QUOTE]
Actually, he is just looking beyond the obvious and considering how and where it would be used. Often called strategy...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.