All references to climate change have been deleted from the White House website

[Bradyns]

Good luck Florida, California, et al...

[Col. Buggernuts]

Some impressive speed of action on their part. Shame it was for the wrong thing.
[QUOTE=Bradyns;51700095]Good luck Florida, California, et al...[/QUOTE][video=youtube;XyyL_TICbrU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyyL_TICbrU[/video]

[spectator1]

Alright start building giant fishbowls like in the jetsons then.

[JennyC6]

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51699614] If there is one flaw in your argument, the alt-right will start creating waterfalls of tears and screaming "THOSE MEAN MEAN LIBERALS!"[/QUOTE]

They're going to do that anyway, even if your statement is un-debatable, objective fact, such as 'The sky is a light shade of blue' or 'Water is wet'. Honestly the best thing to do when the alt-right starts up the waaaahmbulance is to just ignore them and focus your discussion on moderates who actually have a brain in their skull. You'll never sway the alt-right anyway so why even bother trying? Ignore them and move on. They're not worth the effort and time.

[Mr. Someguy]

[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;51699557]How could you possibly defend this[/QUOTE]

The people defending it deny that climate change is real, or deny that humans can cause or prevent it.

Then after denying scientific-fact, they wonder why universities are becoming increasingly liberal.

[A_Pigeon]

[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51699614]Since it was Obama's (as in, it was basically a pro-obama piece that belonged to obama) it was wiped. I think that even if Clinton was in charge it would've been wiped

The thing people should be worrying about is ofc his policies and this:

ALWAYS have a legitimate reason to criticize Trump. If there is one flaw in your argument, the alt-right will start creating waterfalls of tears and screaming "THOSE MEAN MEAN LIBERALS!"[/QUOTE]

Are you seriously complaining about having to back up your argument?

[HumanAbyss]

[QUOTE=A_Pigeon;51700418]Are you seriously complaining about having to back up your argument?[/QUOTE]

No that's not at all what he's saying