• Man jailed for killing and eating rarest tiger in China
    56 replies, posted
[QUOTE=SantanaDVX;19205328]But it doesn't change the fact that you're ready to kill a [B]man[/B] over an [B]animal.[/B] :ohdear:[/QUOTE] Humans ARE animals.
[QUOTE=McSanchez;19208343]Humans ARE animals.[/QUOTE] your species over other species would be worded better for what hes trying to convey Which on a global perspective, is very shallow thinking
why did this make me think of MGS3
Hahaha. Hope the tiger was tasty.
[QUOTE=McSanchez;19208343]Humans ARE animals.[/QUOTE] only in the bedroom.
[QUOTE=Pretiacruento;19205432]Why not? Animals don't kil eachother [i]for the fuck of it[/i]. [B]I'd feed them to lions if I could... now THAT would be a fair trial, Roman style.[/B] EDIT: Fixed[/QUOTE] I'm sure the Romans would happily feed[B] you[/B] to the lions if you told them you value an animal's life enough to suggest death penalty for killing one.
[QUOTE=Snake31;19208200]I always heard that Chinese people eat cats but this is fucking ridiculous.[/QUOTE] Apparently some like the bigger variety.
Now that is badass
[QUOTE=acds;19211066]I'm sure the Romans would happily feed[B] you[/B] to the lions if you told them you value an animal's life enough to suggest death penalty for killing one.[/QUOTE] Depends on the animal and the person's social status. No doubt a prisoner of war could easily be killed if they caused the death of a general's favourite horse.
[QUOTE=ThePuska;19211310]Depends on the animal and the person's social status. No doubt a prisoner of war could easily be killed if they caused the death of a general's favourite horse.[/QUOTE] Of course, but not because of the rights of the animal (which were non-existent then) but for the fact that it was the possession of an important figure (same thing if you broke the emperor's favorite statue or something).
I guess he now has the eye of the tiger :smug:
Whats the big deal ? If the tiger's species was either useful, either badass enough to protect themselves they wouldn't be endangered. That's called [b]natural selection[/b]
"Last Request?" "Oh i'd love to see an Indonesian Tig- oh wait TEEEEHEEE!"
[QUOTE=LoserMan255;19213732]Whats the big deal ? If the tiger's species was either useful, either badass enough to protect themselves they wouldn't be endangered. That's called [b]natural selection[/b][/QUOTE] *pinches nose* Please... Do me a fucking favor. Get off your ass, go back to the classroom,and learn the true meaning of natural selection. Natural Selection is the theory that animals with certain genetics would be better fit for environments in which their species is not normally use to. Example. Tiger X realizes the water hole is beginning to dry up. He decides to leave and look for an area with more food supplies. On the other hand, Tiger Z stays at the water hole ,and comes back the next morning in need of water so he can have enough energy to hunt ,but realizes their is no water. Tiger Z eventually dies out from de-hydration while Tiger X finds a new water hole about twenty miles away. That is Natural Selection....It's the one that has the intelligence to adapt ,and proceed to mate to make children with the genetics of the parents who managed to live through something. Natural Selection is not something that gives the creature the badassness as you would call it to dodge bullets with cyber-punk armor. It's the matter of genetics and being able to pass your genetics onto a future generation. (Don't fucking make me get out the charts explaining how it works....)
Reminds me the time that I ate that dodo. But I didn't like it so I threw it away.
[QUOTE=Pretiacruento;19205052]What, no death penalty for all those assholes? Oh right, you get death penalty for talking smack against the Chinese government, but just a few years in jail if you killed what's believed to be the last specimen of a national endangered species... Way to go, China... [b]*RAGE*[/b][/QUOTE] Are you actually comparing the death of animal to a human life? Sure killing the animal was wrong, against the law but not on this planet does it deserve the death penalty.
[QUOTE=ILikeHappyMeals;19215291]Are you actually comparing the death of animal to a human life? Sure killing the animal was wrong, against the law but not on this planet does it deserve the death penalty.[/QUOTE] the animal liberation front would like to have a word with you
This is sad.
[img]http://stochasticresonance.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/meat.jpg[/img] om nom nom nom
[QUOTE=SantanaDVX;19205135] You're ready to kill a man over the death of an animal? Holy shit.[/QUOTE] Yeah of course. They have 1 billion other people but only one of those tigers...
[QUOTE=SantanaDVX;19205135]You're ready to kill a man over the death of an animal? Holy shit.[/QUOTE] That tiger's life was worth way more than his.
What a bitch.
Would you all rather a man died of hunger than a stupid tiger which china itself used to eat?
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;19214349]That is Natural Selection....It's the one that has the intelligence to adapt ,and proceed to mate to make children with the genetics of the parents who managed to live through something. [/QUOTE] Natural Selection is about inheritable traits, not intelligence.. animals that have adaptations which help them survive (for example, the peppered moth had a camouflage which helped them survive through the industrial revolution, so they pass on this camouflage) will pass on those genes. Where are you getting intelligence from? What does a tiger drinking from a waterhole have to do with natural selection?
[QUOTE=ILikeHappyMeals;19215291]Are you actually comparing the death of animal to a human life? Sure killing the animal was wrong, against the law but not on this planet does it deserve the death penalty.[/QUOTE] But this is in China, silly, you can get death for talking shit about the government And also, they eat dogs in China, not cats
[QUOTE=Archy;19210009]why did this make me think of MGS3[/QUOTE] Because you're a fucking weirdo?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.