53 House Republicans call on Obama to fire Kevin Jennings - Polidicks

*complains about acknowledgment of homosexuality in grade school* *is completely aware that heterosexuality is not only acknowledged, but treated as the status quo in grade school* *claims to support gay rights :ironicat:* regardless of what the guy in the OP did or didn't do, you people seem to assume that grade schools tolerating homosexuality means that they'll start teaching explicit gay sex to first graders. That's not the case you idiots. [editline]09:30AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Wolf_Marine;18759898] 1.Reflections of a Rock Lobster 2. Queer 13 <- this one's a big giveaway by title alone. 3. Revolutionary Voices 4. In Your Face 5. Passages of Pride [/QUOTE] lol you are literally judging books by their cover if you actually did any research instead of basing your criticism on titles alone, you'd see that all of these books are just memoirs or anthologies of teenagers talking about what it was like to grow up gay. What, did you think they're gay erotica novels?

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;18782649]*complains about acknowledgment of homosexuality in grade school* *is completely aware that heterosexuality is not only acknowledged, but treated as the status quo in grade school* *claims to support gay rights :ironicat:* regardless of what the guy in the OP did or didn't do, you people seem to assume that grade schools tolerating homosexuality means that they'll start teaching explicit gay sex to first graders. That's not the case you idiots. [editline]09:30AM[/editline] lol you are literally judging books by their cover if you actually did any research instead of basing your criticism on titles alone, you'd see that all of these books are just memoirs or anthologies of teenagers talking about what it was like to grow up gay. What, did you think they're gay erotica novels?[/QUOTE] I'm not saying they shouldn't tolerate homoesexuality. I want the guy fired because of his actions, not his sexuality. If they find a replacement that wants to help the cause of toleration, that's a good thing. But handling shit the way Jennings does is not something I think should be going on in the government.

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18781693]Don't fuck with Rowsdower you bastard he WILL fuck your shit up i have seen him bite a man's face off with his hockey hair [editline]03:11PM[/editline] and you're a damn fool to think the Republican's have no bias here. [editline]03:12PM[/editline] I wasn't aware pushing for tolerance of a beaten minority is selfish zeal [editline]03:12PM[/editline] you're a really bad poster, you know that? [editline]03:14PM[/editline] [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v157/ninesixtwo/Mike-dower.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] You're really grasping at straws here.

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;18782938]You're really grasping at straws here.[/QUOTE] not really, you're over dramatizing what he did. And you're saying something so fucking naive that the conservatives don't have the slightest bias towards him. I realize you being a shit poster and apologist for authoritative groups and retarded conservative, but why do I still respond to you?

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18783095]not really, you're over dramatizing what he did[/QUOTE] Breaking a law? I missed the part that said if you were part of a minority, it was a-ok to ditch your legal responsibilities.

What law, super poster: strider_07, did he break?

[QUOTE=Strider_07;18783149]Breaking a law? I missed the part that said if you were part of a minority, it was a-ok to ditch your legal responsibilities.[/QUOTE] Because the minority will always have more power than the majority.

[QUOTE=Sickle;18783193]Because the minority will always have more power than the majority.[/QUOTE] This is what conservatives actually believe

Those uppity queers and kneegrows are bringing down the white man

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18783181]What law, super poster: strider_07, did he break?[/QUOTE] Not reporting a suspected case of statutory rape. [editline]09:28AM[/editline] You just can't believe that there are people who don't judge based on sexuality, can you?

[QUOTE=Strider_07;18783276]Not reporting a suspected case of statutory rape.[/QUOTE] I wasn't aware that was a law. First of all, you don't know how old the "older" man was. Second, Statutory rape laws are extremely and unnecessarily harsh. Third, it was not considered the best move, but in my view, it was. Simply because the kid didn't give a name or anything, so an investigation if reported may have found nothing. So just telling the kid "hay u dont do tht", may as well tell him to use protection. fourth, we don't even know the full story to understand it, so drop it. This news story sucks at describing shit. and it's not that serious, it was 21 years ago. [editline]06:36PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Strider_07;18783276] You just can't believe that there are people who don't judge based on sexuality, can you?[/QUOTE] uhhh, I can believe that. You're dealing with 53 house republicans you naive fuck. [quote]As the founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Mr. Jennings has played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools—an agenda that runs counter to the values that many parents desire to instill in their children.[/quote] this does not seem biased to you? [editline]06:37PM[/editline] [quote]homosexual agenda [/quote] This is a conspiracy theory have you not heard of this before?

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18783361]I wasn't aware that was a law. [/QUOTE] actually it is for public school teachers. They are legally required to report child abuse.

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18783361]I wasn't aware that was a law. First of all, you don't know how old the "older" man was. Second, Statutory rape laws are extremely and unnecessarily harsh. Third, it was not considered the best move, but in my view, it was. Simply because the kid didn't give a name or anything, so an investigation if reported may have found nothing. So just telling the kid "hay u dont do tht", may as well tell him to use protection. fourth, we don't even know the full story to understand it, so drop it. This news story sucks at describing shit. and it's not that serious, it was 21 years ago.[/QUOTE] Oh, sorry. I was unaware that time erased the illegality of actions. Suppose we should pardon anyone charged with sexual crime after 21 years then? [quote]uhhh, I can believe that. You're dealing with 53 house republicans you naive fuck. this does not seem biased to you?[/QUOTE] Nowhere did I say they weren't biased, I said [I]I, personally (meaning ME EXCLUSIVELY)[/I] believe he should be fired on these grounds.

I stand corrected. (what year was it enacted?) regardless, it's a shitty law that needs reform. [editline]06:43PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Strider_07;18783460]Nowhere did I say they weren't biased, I said [I]I, personally (meaning ME EXCLUSIVELY)[/I] believe he should be fired on these grounds.[/QUOTE] Acceptable [editline]06:44PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Strider_07;18783276] You just can't believe that there are people who don't judge based on sexuality, can you?[/QUOTE] uh, actually you did say it.

Don't try putting words in my mouth, it makes you look stupid. [editline]09:46AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Trotsky;18783489]uh, actually you did say it.[/QUOTE] Where did I say he should be fired for being gay? and I'm not defending the Republicans, that party's become a bastardization of anything close to good it used to stand for.

[QUOTE=Strider_07;18783276] You just can't believe that there are people who don't judge based on sexuality, can you?[/QUOTE] HEY STRIDER hiyah fellar guess what this is this is your quote in your own words with obvious intentions I can't very well put the SAME exact words in your mouth, can I? [editline]06:48PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Strider_07;18783529]Don't try putting words in my mouth, it makes you look stupid. [editline]09:46AM[/editline] Where did I say he should be fired for being gay? and I'm not defending the Republicans, that party's become a bastardization of anything close to good it used to stand for.[/QUOTE] Notice where I said "acceptable". I was talking about your opinion

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18783553]HEY STRIDER hiyah fellar guess what this is this is your quote in your own words with obvious intentions I can't very well put the SAME exact words in your mouth, can I?[/QUOTE] How am I saying I hate him for being gay? I'm telling you that there are people (me included) who aren't judging him for being gay. Way to read. [editline]09:49AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Trotsky;18783553]Notice where I said "acceptable". I was talking about your opinion[/QUOTE] What the fuck are you on about then?

I, me, Leon Fuckall Trotsky, think your opinion, that Mr. Jennings should be fired because he did something stupid in 1988, is acceptable, although I disagree, is an ok opinion. The Republican's are obviously blowing this out of proportion as well as being bias towards gay people

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18783575]I, me, Leon Fuckall Trotsky, think your opinion, that Mr. Jennings should be fired because he did something stupid in 1988, is acceptable, although I disagree, is an ok opinion. The Republican's are obviously blowing this out of proportion as well as being bias towards gay people[/QUOTE] Gotcha. Sorry, I didn't get what you were saying.

and I do NOT, however, think the reasons given by the house republicans is Acceptable. [editline]06:53PM[/editline] we fucked that up

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18783620]and I do NOT, however, think the reasons given by the house republicans is Acceptable. [editline]06:53PM[/editline] we fucked that up[/QUOTE] Well yes, [I]they're[/I] going after him for promoting the "vast gay conspiracy" or whatever they're on about now. it's kind of like how they go after the Mexicans for mowing our lawns. [QUOTE=MachiniOs;18783656]If he can't do the job, give him a chance then fire him. Unfortunately it doesn't work here in Britain as both Gordon [B]Brown[/B] and David Cameron are [B]shit.[/B][/QUOTE] I really need to sleep more, lest I keep making connections like this.

If he can't do the job, give him a chance then fire him. Unfortunately it doesn't work here in Britain as both Gordon Brown and David Cameron are shit.

[QUOTE=Strider_07;18783651]Well yes, [I]they're[/I] going after him for promoting the "vast gay conspiracy" or whatever they're on about now. it's kind of like how they go after the Mexicans for mowing our lawns. I really need to sleep more, lest I keep making connections like this.[/QUOTE] Exactly.

[url=http://www.sexlaws.org/california_statutory_rape#Q1]Also if you're still curious, in California, it's Penal Code §§ 11166; 11165.7[/url]

[QUOTE=Negrul1;18767571]Why does everyone make such a big thing about gay people? Just legalize marriage, try to stop the discrimination as much as possible (which will hopefully stop independently in the relatively near future) and that's all we need to do. We don't need gay, lesbian and straight education networks, we don't need to introduce gay themes into America's classrooms, we just need people in general to treat gay people as the same as they treat straight people, not different but equal, not better, not as something special, but as normal people who happen to fancy the same sex.[/QUOTE] It will be awesome when people can say "his boyfriend" casually.

[QUOTE=Strider_07;18783460]Oh, sorry. I was unaware that time erased the illegality of actions. Suppose we should pardon anyone charged with sexual crime after 21 years then?[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.sgnewwave.com/main/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/roman-polandki.jpg[/img] Please?

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18781693]Don't fuck with Rowsdower you bastard he WILL fuck your shit up i have seen him bite a man's face off with his hockey hair [editline]03:11PM[/editline] and you're a damn fool to think the Republican's have no bias here. [editline]03:12PM[/editline] I wasn't aware pushing for tolerance of a beaten minority is selfish zeal [editline]03:12PM[/editline] you're a really bad poster, you know that? [editline]03:14PM[/editline] [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v157/ninesixtwo/Mike-dower.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Please get the hell out of here, it's clear you're just trolling at this point because people don't agree with your non-existent points.

[QUOTE=Howe;18789603]Please get the hell out of here, it's clear you're just trolling at this point because people don't agree with your non-existent points.[/QUOTE] uhh... no, I have points. you're just illiterate

[QUOTE=Trotsky;18789652]uhh... no, I have points. you're just illiterate[/QUOTE] No, I'm pretty sure you think the guy did nothing wrong. I read the New York times every other day so take your superiority complex and toss it. You're just another "Oh you're all just gay bashers that's why you don't like him" Get out. You're also a troll for trying to stir up shit for no good reason.

[QUOTE=Howe;18789691]No, I'm pretty sure you think the guy did nothing wrong. I read the New York times every other day so take your superiority complex and toss it. You're just another "Oh you're all just gay bashers that's why you don't like him" Get out. You're also a troll for trying to stir up shit for no good reason.[/QUOTE] uhh haha are you serious?