It's going fine naturally so far: [url]https://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/359217063916613632[/url]
[QUOTE=wickedplayer494;41550406]It's going fine naturally so far: [url]https://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/359217063916613632[/url][/QUOTE]
Are we seriously going to have regular hourly updates on this?
[QUOTE=Forumaster;41550237]
When I read the title I thought maybe North West was being admitted. I'm sure her parents are starting her on the sex starved, moronic slut lifestyle early.[/QUOTE]
It would be cool if she grew up to be some kind of chaste genius despite her parents.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;41550421]Are we seriously going to have regular hourly updates on this?
[/QUOTE]
YES ITS THE ROYAL BABY DON'T LIKE IT GO AWAY I THINK IT'LL BE CUTE OH MY GOD ITS BEEN AGES SINCE A BABY HAS BORN.
stillborn
[QUOTE=Pyth;41550486]stillborn[/QUOTE]
Really?
Wrap it with the English flag and play the trumpets as the baby is escorted out of the hospital.
[QUOTE=areolop;41550201]its the royal baby. Shut your mouth.[/QUOTE]
Yeah - Today, we get to find out who we're gonna be making fun of for the next 85 years.
[editline]22nd July 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Pyth;41550486]stillborn[/QUOTE]
No - conjoined twins
[QUOTE=Stockers678;41550513]
No - conjoined twins[/QUOTE]
Then who gets to be king?
Godspeed, future coin
I'll use you to buy a beer sometime.
[QUOTE=Riller;41550524]Then who gets to be king?[/QUOTE]
Some obscure German with royal blood will press their claim.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;41550560]Some obscure German with royal blood will press their claim.[/QUOTE]
Why not just stop the puppet-show and let the true rulers claim the throne...
[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_mKpLelvRuYY/SvsL7phNSLI/AAAAAAAADR8/8Ntl8BziOqY/s400/corgi+crown.jpg[/IMG]
Baby is actually a corgi
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;41550603]Baby is actually a corgi[/QUOTE]
Not even kidding, I'd shit a snowman of joy if my wife gave birth to a corgi.
[QUOTE=Riller;41550614]Not even kidding, I'd shit a snowman of joy if my wife gave birth to a corgi.[/QUOTE]
I'd probably be terrified because whatever demon that impregnated my wife is probably coming to claim my soul next.
[QUOTE=Riller;41550524]Then who gets to be king?[/QUOTE]
Most of the time, conjoined twins are separated. And then, usually, at least one of the twins would die. So that solves the problem there :(
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;41550650]I'd probably be terrified because whatever demon that impregnated my wife is probably coming to claim my soul next.[/QUOTE]
Dude, my son and/or daughter would be a corgi. A friggin' [I]corgi[/I]! Imagine how rad that'd be? Obviously, since he or she would be my child, the dog'd enjoy full human rights and all. I'd insist that he/she'd attend school, and I god damn promise you, he/she'd be the most popular kid in any class, [I]ever.[/I]
I'm happy for them like most, but I hate the media's obsession
[QUOTE=CaptainObvious1;41550365]We shouldn't have a monarchy. Tax-payers are having to pay millions of pounds for this baby when its born so it can have the highest quality of care etc while that money could go towards trying to protect children with a lower quality of life in the UK.[/QUOTE]
Who's to say they won't look after their own baby with the money William earns legit through his job in the RAF, not to mention he's barely touched the cash left over from his mother's death, and also the royal family's tax-earned funds has allowed them to willingly patron over 800 charities and organisations relating to children, education and healthcare alone
[QUOTE=Laputa;41552583]
Who's to say they won't look after their own baby with the money William earns legit through his job in the RAF, not to mention he's barely touched the cash left over from his mother's death, and also the royal family's tax-earned funds has allowed them to willingly patron over 800 charities and organisations relating to children, education and healthcare alone[/QUOTE]
No you don't understand!
[B]They're bad because I got told so[/B]
Who cares.
The baby's name is going to be either Hashtag or Pocahontas.
At least, it better be.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;41550227]Everybody in the commonwealth does blimey.[/QUOTE]
I can assure you it's not [I]everyone[/I] in the bloody Commonwealth.
They should name him if a boy after this character.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/FYWU0.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Prez;41550061]I thought we were done with vague-ass titles.[/QUOTE]
way to catch the joke
[QUOTE=kevin32891;41553144]They should name him if a boy after this character.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/FYWU0.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Hell no.
I've watched only five minutes of that shitty show and I can already say that Joffrey Whoiswhatsit's face is one of the most punchable faces in the world.
Perfect thread title! EDIT: For posterity, the original title was "Woman admitted to maternity ward"
[QUOTE=Riller;41550387]The British monarchy is a profitable business. They bring more money in than they cost.
[editline]22nd July 2013[/editline]
[URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhyYgnhhKFw[/URL]
Also corgis.[/QUOTE]
This video is actually very misleading. [URL="http://www.republic.org.uk/blog/?p=221"]The Crown Estate isn't the personal property of the royal family; it's owned by another branch of the state.[/URL] The claim that if the government stopped paying the royal family expenses then they'd take back the land is just flat out wrong - the Crown Estate would continue to raise revenue for the government if we became a republic because it's state-owned.
[URL="http://www.republic.org.uk/What we want/In depth/Tourism/index.php"]
The tourism argument also doesn't really have any evidence to support it.[/URL] There isn't any real proof that tourism would suffer if we didn't have a monarchy, that's just a baseless assumption he's making. In fact, if places such as Buckingham Palace weren't in use, that'd allow tourists to visit the entirety of them all year round, so if anything it'd [I]increase[/I] tourism.
Unless this baby plops out of Kate Middleton holding Half Life 3 and a new Aphex Twin album, I don't care.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;41550560]Some obscure German with royal blood will press their claim.[/QUOTE]
He/she will be about as German as you are British.
I'm genuinely curious to see what'd the response be if the Baby had a mental disabilty and whether the rules of succession still apply.
[QUOTE=EddieLTU;41550099]its finally happening
it took a whole week[/QUOTE]
I thought babies took 9 months to mature. :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.