• Woman posts picture of her baby with a bong on Facebook, cops aren't amused
    139 replies, posted
Hey lets put a picture of a baby smoking a bong online, thats a great idea! :downs:
Yeah i am gonna post a pic of my baby hitting a bong as a joke. :downs: Really? Some people should get some brains...
[QUOTE=Dashiel;22939533]I hope her baby gets taken away from her, 19 is too young to be a responsible parent as it is.[/QUOTE] Uh. Not all 19 year olds aren't responsible enough, that's fucking ridiculous.
Fucking druggies. Kid is going to turn out a idiot.
-snip- read wrong
[QUOTE=SatansSin;22947079]Fucking druggies. Kid is going to turn out a idiot.[/QUOTE] Typically bongs are only used for marijuana and less often tobacco, neither will make her or the kid an idiot unless they're already an idiot to begin with.
[QUOTE=Doriol;22939459]Mother does something harmless -- police outraged.[/QUOTE] We know now that it had no drugs but what if it had? Should the cops just sit there while someone is possibly risking a baby's life?
[QUOTE=Electrocuter;22949149]We know now that it had no drugs but what if it had? Should the cops just sit there while someone is possibly risking a baby's life?[/QUOTE] If she had allowed a baby to smoke out of a bong, the cop's response would be justified. But she didn't, and the baby is still alive. So... what's your point?
[quote]"If u look at the picture u can see that there is no bowl in the [B]TABACCO[/B] pipe," she responded, with grammatical and spelling errors. "And i took a pic to show one (expletive) person and it was a mistake. I would never ever ever let him [B]get high[/B]."[/quote]
Dugs arent serious if handeled carefully
You can clearly see smoke in the chamber.
[QUOTE=Doriol;22949173]If she had allowed a baby to smoke out of a bong, the cop's response would be justified. But she didn't, and the baby is still alive. So... what's your point?[/QUOTE] Oh look a rebel, how about you go do what the lady did, to prove to us it's ok. And nobody knows if that bong had anything in it. If you look at it, there is smoke in it. I would bet 10$ to say that isn't some harmless gas, that lady went out and got for this cte picture. I bet the 19 year old retard was "responsible" enough to remove her drugs, since her track record is already fantastic. No matter how much you think this is wrong, It will never change. Society is not going to let you give babies bongs to pose in pictures. Your making me sad, that someone out there is trying to justify that the lady shouldn't be paid attention to.
[QUOTE=Tudd Fudders;22949432]Oh look a rebel, how about you go do what the lady did, to prove to us it's ok. And nobody knows if that bong had anything in it. I bet the 19 year old retard was "responsible" to do that since her track record is already fantastic. No matter how much you think this is wrong. It will never change, society is not going to let you give babies bongs to pose in pictures. Your making me sad someone out there is trying to justify that the lady shouldn't be paid attention to.[/QUOTE] Jesus man your like a fucking internet police officer. Lay off
[QUOTE=lum1naire;22939430]sux2bher lmao[/QUOTE] omg ikr? Seriously, this mother is a twat. "HURR I'LL LET MY BABY SMOKE A BONG BUT HE DIDN'T INHALE!"
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;22944316]Yeah, but it's about the principle. You don't let [b]toddlers[/b] who do NOT really get the risks play with unloaded guns, do you? [editline]06:57AM[/editline] My point is, that weed might be harmless for adults, but isn't harmless for toddlers, so they should be strongly protected from in, including avoidance of building familiarity with the bong at this age.[/QUOTE] Weed =/= Guns I doubt the child even knew what it was called, let alone what it did. It's a harmless picture, and obviously staged. The woman is obviously a retard, but that's beside the point, the picture was harmless.
The baby holding a bong, not big deal. The mom being 19, also not a big deal. The stupid mother taking a picture of the act and posting it on facebook, fucking stupid.
[QUOTE=Tudd Fudders;22949432]:words:[/QUOTE] Could you explain to me how I'm wrong and how I'm a rebel? [QUOTE=Strongbad;22949485]Seriously, this mother is a twat. "HURR I'LL LET MY BABY SMOKE A BONG BUT HE DIDN'T INHALE!"[/QUOTE] I have to ask: Did you even read the article? And do any of you even know how a bong works? The thing isn't even lit.
[QUOTE=Doriol;22950637]Could you explain to me how I'm wrong and how I'm a rebel? I have to ask: Did you even read the article? And do any of you even know how a bong works? The thing isn't even lit.[/QUOTE] Is it even possible to have a intelligent debate with you?
Do you have something against my use of rhetorical questions?
I love how this went from a discussion about a woman giving her baby a bong to a discussion about how if we spent less on fighting cocaine we'd have a space colony now
[QUOTE=Lord of Awesome;22950779]Is it even possible to have a intelligent debate with you?[/QUOTE] nice avatar, goes well with your post. nice use of sarcasm.
[QUOTE=GoldenGnome;22939777]guys it's obviously a vase[/QUOTE] Without reading the thread/not knowing the term "bong", I thought it was a dildo.
[QUOTE=CoolKingKaso;22952679]Without reading the thread/not knowing the term "bong", I thought it was a dildo.[/QUOTE] That would be one huge dildo.
It looks like it has smoke in the chamber..
[QUOTE=Tudd Fudders;22949432]Oh look a rebel, how about you go do what the lady did, to prove to us it's ok. And nobody knows if that bong had anything in it. If you look at it, there is smoke in it. I would bet 10$ to say that isn't some harmless gas, that lady went out and got for this cte picture. I bet the 19 year old retard was "responsible" enough to remove her drugs, since her track record is already fantastic. No matter how much you think this is wrong, It will never change. Society is not going to let you give babies bongs to pose in pictures. Your making me sad, that someone out there is trying to justify that the lady shouldn't be paid attention to.[/QUOTE] He's talking from the point of view in which the bong is emtpy, you are in which it's filled with smoke You're both just spouting nonsense, continuously measuring e-penis, while it's absolutely non-contributive to this thread.
[QUOTE=Tudd Fudders;22949432]Oh look a rebel, how about you go do what the lady did, to prove to us it's ok. And nobody knows if that bong had anything in it. If you look at it, there is smoke in it. I would bet 10$ to say that isn't some harmless gas, that lady went out and got for this cte picture. I bet the 19 year old retard was "responsible" enough to remove her drugs, since her track record is already fantastic. No matter how much you think this is wrong, It will never change. Society is not going to let you give babies bongs to pose in pictures. Your making me sad, that someone out there is trying to justify that the lady shouldn't be paid attention to.[/QUOTE] That's an empty bong.... Not all of them are clear and see through. And she shouldn't be paid attention to.
[QUOTE=Comrade General;22952348]I love how this went from a discussion about a woman giving her baby a bong to a discussion about how if we spent less on fighting cocaine we'd have a space colony now[/QUOTE] Ok, this made me giggle. The debate did get out of hand.
Well it was stupid but it happens. But cops shouldn't do shit about because stupid thing was harmless.
[QUOTE=SebSharpy;22945595]But the thousands of photos of babys with beer bottles are acceptable.[/QUOTE] This is one of the best posts in this thread and it has been completely ignored. If you're bitching about the picture but you think that the countless images of babies with liquor bottles is fine, or even just significantly more acceptable, then you're a fucking fool.
[QUOTE=Llivavin;22944710]So you want all medication to fall off the map as well? Last i checked, more people abuse prescription drugs like crazy. Not to mention the fact that simply knowing how chemicals move around in the body and what effects they give when xxx happens would give rise to designer drugs. Not to mention this: [URL]http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html[/URL] Or the fact that having it remain illegal only creates drug cartels and organized crime, get rid of their source of income, get rid of the crime.[/QUOTE] Ok, you know just as well as I do that that is NOT what I want, nor what I was even close to insinuating. I am not arguing against these because I believe it to be 'immoral' or the war on drugs to be 'justified' I am arguing against it simply because in my mind they are weak. To bend and become a drug addict is to show weakness, the same weakness that continues to pollute our gene pool. I don't care what happens, or how it happens. So long as they don't do it anymore, is that better? Yeah, I sound like a dick for saying that. But it's called thinking logically, not humanely. Which is what we need to do as a whole more often. [QUOTE=Llivavin;22944710] You're acting as if the USA is the world, stop doing that. [/QUOTE] The article involved the United States, hence, I kept my thinking in the United States. I used the word world as a generality. I was under the impression that this was understood. [QUOTE=Llivavin;22944710] I'm not even going to touch this one, just know that it shouldn't happen with out world peace. (space wars; no thanks.) [/QUOTE] I think a space war would be quite the sight to behold, personally. [QUOTE=Llivavin;22944710] Your "alternatives" are based off of a closed and sheltered view of the world.[/QUOTE] And yours are based off of a necessity to attempt to shatter every other "alternative" leaving only your own through use of, well really nothing. The first section of your reply contained relevant information, the remainder was just attempting to cut me down using baseless conjecture. And for future reference, it's more a logical reactionary view of the world.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.