• Woman posts picture of her baby with a bong on Facebook, cops aren't amused
    139 replies, posted
as far as they know, its used for tobacco.
While I'm not against marijuana, nor do I use it, I still believe this woman should be called into question about her parenting skills. IMO the fact that she gave her child something that he shouldn't be in contact with and then showing the motions to operate it is very irresponsible. The kid shouldn't have been introduced to something that is potentially harmful to his health, especially by his own mother, and the purpose to this was to only joke about it? seems pretty questionable to me.
Tommy! is that you!
[QUOTE=Kalibos;22965619]This is one of the best posts in this thread and it has been completely ignored. If you're bitching about the picture but you think that the countless images of babies with liquor bottles is fine, or even just significantly more acceptable, then you're a fucking fool.[/QUOTE] Also this.
[QUOTE=chaoselite;22993725]While I'm not against marijuana, nor do I use it, I still believe this woman should be called into question about her parenting skills. IMO the fact that she gave her child something that he shouldn't be in contact with and then showing the motions to operate it is very irresponsible. The kid shouldn't have been introduced to something that is potentially harmful to his health, especially by his own mother, and the purpose to this was to only joke about it? seems pretty questionable to me.[/QUOTE] Let me ask you this, if it was an empty beer bottle, would you be saying the same thing?
[QUOTE=chucknorriz;22942448]Were drugs to fall off the map there would be no need to teach against them. [/QUOTE] Too bad drugs have been one of the most useful assets since the beginning of medicine. [QUOTE=chucknorriz;22942448]It's a valid strategy and calling it asinine is in itself illogical. The world isn't ready for it to be legalized, maybe once we get the more basic human rights legalized and accepted like oh, I don't know, homosexual marriage and general acceptance of same sex couples THEN it might be a proper time to push legislation. [/QUOTE] Every year we waste billions of dollars on the drug trade, incarcerate thousands of people, the amount of users is steadily climbing and the world is becoming more and more liberal. And the world isn't ready for legalization of drugs? [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis[/url] [QUOTE=chucknorriz;22942448]The drug war is unimportant in the long run. It is nothing more than an inconvenient speed bump in the progression of humanity. A blemish on the face of mankind. I'm not the type of person who looks at whats happening. I look at what could be happening, and the stupid little mistakes we make to impede our ascension to something so much more than what we are.[/QUOTE] Thousands of people dying, billions of dollars wasted, and thousands arrested? And that's no big deal to you? Your views on reality are pretty twisted. [QUOTE=chucknorriz;22942448]Also, I agree, space exploration isn't the answer to everything. Space expansion is though. Denying this makes you no better than the church or the government. Every year we continue to confine ourselves to earth is another year closer to extinction.[/QUOTE] I wasn't aware that expansion into space would remove our human nature. [QUOTE=chucknorriz;22942448]In addition, you sir are, as far as I am concerned, an offensive and easily angered individual. I wasn't arguing against any points or attempting to bash (for lack of a better word) any opinions. I was simply stating alternatives to them, attempting to engage in a discussion. I did not appreciate being called "thick" or my ideas being called "stupid" it was uncalled for. If someone wants to discuss something without resorting to name calling I will be happy to entertain them.[/QUOTE] Just statin' the truf brah.
[QUOTE=Kyle v2;22994452]Let me ask you this, if it was an empty beer bottle, would you be saying the same thing?[/QUOTE] Umm, yeah I would, who the fuck would expose their 11-month old to alcohol. What I'm saying hasn't changed, a child sees things and can either see it as good or bad, would you really want your child to see a bottle of alcohol and say "mommy gave this to me before so it must be ok to drink". The one of the responsibilities of being a parent is to divert children from harmful things not to condone it. Hell I'll do more examples, giving your kid a empty cigarette pack. what if he opened it and started eating them? How about letting your child play with an unloaded gun, what if you had a loaded gun under your pillow. YOU DON'T LET CHILDREN PLAY WITH THINGS HARMFUL TO THEIR HEALTH!
[QUOTE=Zeero;22939690]How does this single act judge her parenting skills? She put what seems like an empty piece of drug paraphernalia next to a baby that has zero chance of comprehending what it is or what it is used for. No harm done. Now if the baby was drug tested and resulted positive for drugs then it would be a different story.[/QUOTE] fucking this
[QUOTE=chaoselite;22994837]Umm, yeah I would, who the fuck would expose their 11-month old to alcohol. What I'm saying hasn't changed, a child sees things and can either see it as good or bad, would you really want your child to see a bottle of alcohol and say "mommy gave this to me before so it must be ok to drink". The one of the responsibilities of being a parent is to divert children from harmful things not to condone it. Hell I'll do more examples, giving your kid a empty cigarette pack. what if he opened it and started eating them? How about letting your child play with an unloaded gun, what if you had a loaded gun under your pillow. YOU DON'T LET CHILDREN PLAY WITH THINGS HARMFUL TO THEIR HEALTH![/QUOTE] Calm the fuck down, it was just the hypocrite test.
[QUOTE=chucknorriz;22968712]Ok, you know just as well as I do that that is NOT what I want, nor what I was even close to insinuating. I am not arguing against these because I believe it to be 'immoral' or the war on drugs to be 'justified' I am arguing against it simply because in my mind they are weak. To bend and become a drug addict is to show weakness, the same weakness that continues to pollute our gene pool. I don't care what happens, or how it happens. So long as they don't do it anymore, is that better? Yeah, I sound like a dick for saying that. But it's called thinking logically, not humanely. Which is what we need to do as a whole more often.[/QUOTE] Oh yes, because stripping our race of recreational drugs in the name of strengthening the gene pool is totally valid and adheres to the Constitution. Are you also in favor of the immediate employment of eugenics? Advancement of the human race is nice and all, but removing recreation because it hinders its advancement is nothing less than authoritarian. It's also pretty damn untrue, I can name more than a few artists and scientists influenced by drug usage and heavily support it. How about Carl motherfucking Sagan who supports human expansionism into space as much as yourself. [QUOTE=chucknorriz;22968712]The article involved the United States, hence, I kept my thinking in the United States. I used the word world as a generality. I was under the impression that this was understood.[/QUOTE] So you're anti-drug because you believe that it pollutes our gene-pool, and yet you're putting that under the guise of the United States isn't prepared to legalize drugs? [QUOTE=chucknorriz;22968712]I think a space war would be quite the sight to behold, personally.[/QUOTE] You know you live a sheltered life when you aren't horrified by something like that. [QUOTE=chucknorriz;22968712]And yours are based off of a necessity to attempt to shatter every other "alternative" leaving only your own through use of, well really nothing. [/QUOTE] I'm all for alternatives, your ideas are just faulty.
[QUOTE=Kyle v2;22994976]Calm the fuck down, it was just the hypocrite test.[/QUOTE] Sorry, got a little over excited proving my point.
all babies look alike why would they censor this [editline]08:58PM[/editline] he looks like tommy from the rugrats [editline]08:58PM[/editline] except with a bong
I was going to rant about the mother in this story, but then i got high.
I think the end argument should be: Just, don't be retarded and post it on facebook. Use email.
FacePunch: Getting into unnecessary drug discussions since forever
[img]http://www.facepunch.com/image.php?u=97188&dateline=1260731642[/img]:respek:[img]http://www.facepunch.com/image.php?u=161554&dateline=1257657791[/img] You responded to that much better than i would have.
That is one cool baby. I don't see the difference between the baby breathing that in and 2nd hand smoke. If that's not allowed, ban smoking around babies.
[QUOTE=OutOfPop;22998122]That is one cool baby. I don't see the difference between the baby breathing that in and 2nd hand smoke. If that's not allowed, ban smoking around babies.[/QUOTE] rtfa there wasn't actually anything in the bong
[QUOTE=chucknorriz;22968712]Ok, you know just as well as I do that that is NOT what I want, nor what I was even close to insinuating. I am not arguing against these because I believe it to be 'immoral' or the war on drugs to be 'justified' I am arguing against it simply because in my mind they are weak. To bend and become a drug addict is to show weakness, the same weakness that continues to pollute our gene pool. I don't care what happens, or how it happens. So long as they don't do it anymore, is that better? Yeah, I sound like a dick for saying that. But it's called thinking logically, not humanely. Which is what we need to do as a whole more often. [/quote] Pollute the gene pool, what happened to the freedom of choice and personal rights as man? What are you Hitler? [quote] The article involved the United States, hence, I kept my thinking in the United States. I used the word world as a generality. I was under the impression that this was understood. [/quote] You don't use the word "world" to describe the US. People like you are the reason why other countries see us as self-centered. [quote] I think a space war would be quite the sight to behold, personally. [/quote] Really? You want to see death and destruction in the one place we haven't tainted with war? [quote] And yours are based off of a necessity to attempt to shatter every other "alternative" leaving only your own through use of, well really nothing. The first section of your reply contained relevant information, the remainder was just attempting to cut me down using baseless conjecture. And for future reference, it's more a logical reactionary view of the world.[/QUOTE] Shatter all alternatives? Hardly, only the ones that restrict freedom of man. [editline]10:18PM[/editline] [QUOTE=OutOfPop;22998122]That is one cool baby. I don't see the difference between the baby breathing that in and 2nd hand smoke. If that's not allowed, ban smoking around babies.[/QUOTE] The glass is just frosted.
media too over re-acting maybe? prolly just took it waayyy to seriously
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.