• Proposed Virtual Child Porn Law Trucking Along
    103 replies, posted
They need to think about this alot more.
[QUOTE=Craptasket;20668217]Just ban anime all together, the world would be a happy place[/QUOTE] I love how you implied there that anime is diffrent from regular cartoons, they are one in the same, just a diffrent art style. Now, if you asked for a diffrent style...
[QUOTE=Mr. Someguy;20671916]Just like how videogames create killers, right Jack?[/QUOTE] [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/masseffect/images/4/41/Subject_Zero.png[/img] Jack: Jack Thompson is busy right now, so........................FUCK OFF!
[QUOTE=Mexican;20671646]They use the same logic they did with weed. It's "gateway porn". [editline]04:45PM[/editline] It keeps pedos from looking at real CP. If drawn is illegal they're just going to go "well, since I'm breaking the law anyway, might as well fap to something real."[/QUOTE] With the release of internet porn, rape crimes decreased by 90%
[QUOTE=Shugo;20667955]I never did understand laws against drawn child porn. Who gives a fuck what someone drew on paper? That's almost thought police level. I thought the point of legislature against child porn was to protect kids from getting exploited, not to catch thought criminals who think disgusting thoughts on their own time. The difference between owning child porn and owning manga child porn is that buying child porn supports people who exploit real kids, and buying anime child porn supports people who draw pictures. I tend to believe the former is far more serious than the latter...[/QUOTE] i think i got a title for saying that
[QUOTE=Shugo;20667955]I never did understand laws against drawn child porn. Who gives a fuck what someone drew on paper? That's almost thought police level. I thought the point of legislature against child porn was to protect kids from getting exploited, not to catch thought criminals who think disgusting thoughts on their own time. The difference between owning child porn and owning manga child porn is that buying child porn supports people who exploit real kids, and buying anime child porn supports people who draw pictures. I tend to believe the former is far more serious than the latter...[/QUOTE] Drawn child porn was banned last november in the United Kingdom. This also includes "Lolita" and other such depictions. It carries the same penalties as photographic images.
[QUOTE=ViralHatred;20674408]Drawn child porn was banned last november in the United Kingdom. This also includes "Lolita" and other such depictions. It carries the same penalties as photographic images.[/QUOTE] Do you mean the actual film/book Lolita?
i guess you could say... the evidence against lolicon.... is irre[i]futa[/i]ble... xD
[QUOTE=Rambo_9;20674911]i guess you could say... the evidence against lolicon.... is irre[i]futa[/i]ble... xD[/QUOTE] That was hilarios.
[QUOTE=Shugo;20667955]I never did understand laws against drawn child porn. Who gives a fuck what someone drew on paper? That's almost thought police level. I thought the point of legislature against child porn was to protect kids from getting exploited, not to catch thought criminals who think disgusting thoughts on their own time. The difference between owning child porn and owning manga child porn is that buying child porn supports people who exploit real kids, and buying anime child porn supports people who draw pictures. I tend to believe the former is far more serious than the latter...[/QUOTE] I agree with you. I would rather someone jack off 100 times to a picture of a little girl getting fucked than actually fuck one.
I really don't care about it law wise, but if you honestly think drawn childporn aka "lolicon" is hot and you get off to it, you are a sick fuck who needs to rethink his life.
Loli is better if it keeps pedos from watching real CP amirite?
[QUOTE=Aman V;20675032]I really don't care about it law wise, but if you honestly think drawn childporn aka "lolicon" is hot and you get off to it, you are a sick fuck who needs to rethink his life.[/QUOTE] If you don't like the same things as me you need therapy. Actually then again it is about fucking kids. As long as you're not actually doing it, whatever floats your boat I guess. Personally I dig chicks with an abnormally shaped nose.
Yakuza must love this. They'll make killings off selling bootleg loli, just like they do for uncensored porn.
Well it's about fucking time. That sick shit is what makes me sick about anything Japanese.
[QUOTE=Aman V;20675032]I really don't care about it law wise, but if you honestly think drawn childporn aka "lolicon" is hot and you get off to it, you are a sick fuck who needs to rethink his life.[/QUOTE] Yeah fuck people and their sexual fetishes.
[QUOTE=MercZ;20673402]If you're complaining about "Freedom of Speech", the 1950s isn't really the place to be. Unless you'd conform. People who praise the 1950s are mainly drawing from warped nostalgic depictions of that time. As for the original story, I'd imagine the main reason why it's going through is closing up loopholes that child predators use to get out of court cases. The US used to have a problem with this where a number of people got out pedophilia charges in the early years of the internet by saying that the images on their computers were just pixels, computer generated, drawn, etc. [b]Though as far as I know the US hasn't implemented a law against Loli-type things specifically[/b], though I know Sweden has this sort of laws on their books.[/QUOTE] [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003[/URL] [QUOTE=Wikipedia] Prohibits drawings, sculptures, and pictures of such drawings and sculptures depicting minors in actions or situations that meet the Miller test of being obscene, OR are engaged in sex acts that are deemed to meet the same obscene condition.[/QUOTE] While there was only one actual conviction actually made on that particular statute, [URL="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/02/obscene-us-manga-collector-jailed-6-months/"]as far as I know[/URL], it's still there on the books.
I hate stupid acronyms.
[QUOTE=Mexican;20675820]I hate stupid acronyms.[/QUOTE] i guess you could say..... you [i]H.H.E.K.J.S[/i] stupid acronyms.... xD
Socially unacceptable? Ban it. That's never gone wrong in the past :downs:
[QUOTE=Rambo_9;20675837]i guess you could say..... you [i]H.H.E.K.J.S[/i] stupid acronyms.... xD[/QUOTE]Your avatar is repulsive and reinforces why fucked up shit like this needs to go.
[QUOTE=Doug52392;20675885]Your avatar is repulsive and reinforces why fucked up shit like this needs to go.[/QUOTE] that's an adult. But it's Japanese so it has big eyes and looks like a toddler.
[QUOTE=Cheesemonkey;20674119]i think i got a title for saying that[/QUOTE] What I meant is that drawn child porn shouldn't really be considered a problem whereas real child porn should be what they really focus on. Your title seems to say that not all real child porn has a victim, which is just dumb. :v:
[QUOTE=Cheesemonkey;20674119]i think i got a title for saying that[/QUOTE] we get it man, you're a proud pedo
[QUOTE=Mexican;20675661]If you don't like the same things as me you need therapy. Actually then again it is about fucking kids. As long as you're not actually doing it, whatever floats your boat I guess. Personally I dig chicks with an abnormally shaped nose.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE= Nyaos;20675708]Yeah fuck people and their sexual fetishes.[/QUOTE] If you honestly think fantasing about fucking kids is comparable to liking a stout nose you are stupid. People who get turned on by children real or not have something wrong with them. It is not normal. Some things shouldn't just be accepted in society. Just because the kid is a drawing and is not real, it doesn't mean it isn't portraying a child.
[quote]As CNNGo's David [B]Marx[/B] has pointed out, Japan should worry about actual child pornography in Japan[B][U][/quote] [/U][/B]fucking communists want to corrupt our youth
For those of you who are asking why they are doing this, I think I know part of the story. Some Japanese company made a porn game that involves rape. Some guy decided it was a good idea to sell it on Amazon. People get mad. A British feminist group finds out and tells the Japanese government to kill their porn industry, the UN throws in their support for the feminists and basically does their usual "please don't do that" stuff. Japanese government puts up NO RESISTANCE WHATSOEVER and draws up a plan to enact their own little version of sodomy laws, but it's quickly reduced to a simple anti-cp drawing law. The angry developers blame everything on foreigners in typical xenophobic japanese manner and block foreigners from their websites. It should be noted that from what I've heard about the Japanese government I can honestly say they were some of the most retarded politicians I've ever heard of before this whole Australia thing started.
[QUOTE=Aredbomb;20676882]For those of you who are asking why they are doing this, I think I know part of the story. Some Japanese company made a porn game that involves rape. Some guy decided it was a good idea to sell it on Amazon. People get mad. A British feminist group finds out and tells the Japanese government to kill their porn industry, the UN throws in their support for the feminists and basically does their usual "please don't do that" stuff. Japanese government puts up NO RESISTANCE WHATSOEVER and draws up a plan to enact their own little version of sodomy laws, but it's quickly reduced to a simple anti-cp drawing law. The angry developers blame everything on foreigners in typical xenophobic japanese manner and block foreigners from their websites. It should be noted that from what I've heard about the Japanese government I can honestly say they were some of the most retarded politicians I've ever heard of before this whole Australia thing started.[/QUOTE] That's fucking retarded british feminists are fucking stupid
[QUOTE=Aman V;20676683]If you honestly think fantasing about fucking kids is comparable to liking a stout nose you are stupid. People who get turned on by children real or not have something wrong with them. It is not normal. Some things shouldn't just be accepted in society. Just because the kid is a drawing and is not real, it doesn't mean it isn't portraying a child.[/QUOTE] Yes I know. But most things are not normal. I agree that people shouldn't be viewing child porn. But this lolicon shit prevents them from harming real children. And if they do harm a child, [I]then[/I] we can arrest their ass. Plus therapy is always available for people to fight the urge and many pedophiles do make a conscious effort to escape from it.
[QUOTE=Mexican;20677661]Yes I know. But most things are not normal. I agree that people shouldn't be viewing child porn. But this lolicon shit prevents them from harming real children. And if they do harm a child, [I]then[/I] we can arrest their ass. Plus therapy is always available for people to fight the urge and many pedophiles do make a conscious effort to escape from it.[/QUOTE] I don't think wes should make any assumptions until there's some real data to prove that someone who faps to lolis is more or less likely to rape a child. But if there is any data to prove that lolis are used as an alternative to child molestation, then the correct course of action would be to have it legalized
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.