UN General Assembly Votes To Allow Gays To Be Executed Without Cause - Polidicks

Congo? Really? A country that still executes people for witchcraft gets a say in this?

[QUOTE=RayDark;26244566]Yeah, but the problem is, the UN is someones power foothold, and I doubt they'll want to give it up, so they'll do everything in their power to keep it together.[/quote] The only ones who will lose power are non-democratic countries and maybe those on the bottom tier of democratic countries, but I doubt the bottom tier ones will heavily object. The democratic countries will have to act together to approve of this change if something like this is ever going to be proposed, but I'm sure Europe, north America, and the rest of the western world can pull it through if they try.

As if anyone actually listened to the UNs laws.

[QUOTE=Paravin;26244696]I'm really surprised more Eastern European countries didn't vote for this. Ukraine, Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Russia - the story about homosexual rights is more or less similar in these countries.[/QUOTE] russia is on there

[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;26244509]welp I'm never going to any of those countries[/QUOTE] China, Russia, parts of Africa and parts of the Caribbean were all places I would have really liked to go too. Looks like I'll have to settle for Mongolia, Ukraine, the Safari Park and Ireland.

[QUOTE=RayDark;26244566]You're a fucking dick.[/QUOTE] Yeah, but that doesn't stop me from being right.

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245202]Yeah, but that doesn't stop me from being right.[/QUOTE] No, you're not right. You're assuming based on nothing.

[QUOTE=faze;26244539]Jamaica voted yes on this? What happened to the pot smoking hippy lifestyle? Traitors.[/QUOTE] lol jamaica has one of the most anti-gay cultures I know of

[QUOTE=faze;26245213]No, you're not right. You're assuming based on nothing.[/QUOTE] Bangladesh has one of the lowest literacy rates in South Asia, which is a pretty bad category in itself. Child labour and corruption are both widespread. It is very politically unstable and a large portion of the populace are under the poverty line. Anything I missed?

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245309]Bangladesh has one of the lowest literacy rates in South Asia, which is a pretty bad category in itself. Child labour and corruption are both widespread. It is very politically unstable and a large portion of the populace are under the poverty line. Anything I missed?[/QUOTE] I was referring to your personal attack.

[QUOTE=faze;26245336]I was referring to your personal attack.[/QUOTE] Alright, so you concede that Bangladesh is a shitty country. Good.

i honestly have no clue how people like this can consider themselves 'politicians'

[QUOTE=Ownederd;26245402]i honestly have no clue how people like this can consider themselves 'politicians'[/QUOTE] You're so deliciously naive. This is what being a politician is all about.

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245371]Alright, so you concede that Bangladesh is a shitty country. Good.[/QUOTE] It's a third-world country, but I wouldn't go as far as you.

[QUOTE=faze;26245431]It's a third-world country, but I wouldn't go as far as you.[/QUOTE] Third world countries are shitty countries, what's your point?

[QUOTE=Lachz0r;26238781]russia is a pretty bigoted country. dont understand china though, dont they just execute anybody arbitrarily anyway?[/QUOTE] Even secular authoritarian countries tend to be very socially conservative.

The FUCK

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245459]Third world countries are shitty countries, what's your point?[/QUOTE] That's a dickhead way of putting it; it's not their fault.

[QUOTE=faze;26245501]That's a dickhead way of putting it; it's not their fault.[/QUOTE] Ofcourse it is.

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245548]Ofcourse it is.[/QUOTE] So you're saying the innocent farmer is 100% at fault for being poor, even though he works harder than almost every westerner?

[QUOTE=faze;26245567]So you're saying the innocent farmer is 100% at fault for being poor, even though he works harder than almost every westerner?[/QUOTE] Not nessescarily his, but the country at large, as a social group and a sovereign state, then yes.

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245616]Not nessescarily his, but the country at large, as a social group and a sovereign state, then yes.[/QUOTE] Wrong again.

[QUOTE=faze;26245620]Wrong again.[/QUOTE] Excellent argumentation, care to prove why?

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245638]Excellent argumentation, care to prove why?[/QUOTE] It's not their society's fault that they don't have anyone willing to trade. Fault there usually falls on the government.

[QUOTE=faze;26245674]It's not their society's fault that they don't have anyone willing to trade. Fault there usually falls on the government.[/QUOTE] They don't have anyone willing to trade because they don't produce anything worth trading other than textiles.

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245735]They don't have anyone willing to trade because they don't produce anything worth trading other than textiles.[/QUOTE] Food?

[QUOTE=faze;26245750]Food?[/QUOTE] Oh golly oh gee. That's sure to rapidly modernize the country. Especially considering their population of 150 million people.

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245778]Oh golly oh gee. That's sure to rapidly modernize the country.[/QUOTE] Again, not their fault that they're not Japan with cutting-edge technology.

[QUOTE=faze;26245794]Again, not their fault that they're not Japan with cutting-edge technology.[/QUOTE] Really? I seem to recall Japan being a closed up "third world country" a hundred years ago or so. They pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, why didn't Bangladesh? Which arguably is a land much richer in natural resources.

[QUOTE=Gentlemanne;26245837]Really? I seem to recall Japan being a closed up "third world country" a hundred years ago or so. They pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, why didn't Bangladesh? Which arguably is a land much richer in natural resources.[/QUOTE] Big bad America stepped in, of course.