[QUOTE=Sobotnik;31870170]That's all fine and dandy but if all rebels followed that mindset the civil war would have never begun.[/QUOTE]
How the hell do you figure that? Are you implying an armed rebellion goes against the idea of toppling a dictator?
[QUOTE=Arachnidus;31870193]How the hell do you figure that? Are you implying an armed rebellion goes against the idea of toppling a dictator?[/QUOTE]
Generally people who support democracies also support peace and non-violent actions rather than conflict. When they go into conflict it goes against those ideas but it actually starts to get them going places.
Why would they take his son.
That would suck to be born into such a position.
[QUOTE=zzaacckk;31874047]Why would they take his son.
That would suck to be born into such a position.[/QUOTE]
Perhaps because he has an international warrant out against him for crimes against humanity? Its not like he was an innocent family member, he was leading the regime through the uprising.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;31870577]Generally people who support democracies also support peace and non-violent actions rather than conflict. When they go into conflict it goes against those ideas but it actually starts to get them going places.[/QUOTE]
Keyword: generally. And I'd beg to differ. Many notable modern democracies came out of a revolution, as anything short of an uprising of the proletariat tends to result in an oligarchy.
I'm not seeing how being willing to fight for your beliefs goes against the concept of a government made to represent the people...
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;31870577]Generally people who support democracies also support peace and non-violent actions rather than conflict. When they go into conflict it goes against those ideas but it actually starts to get them going places.[/QUOTE]
What exactly where they supposed to do, Gaddafi wasn't exactly going to give up peacefully.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
