Best Korea fires mortars at Worst Korea - Developing Story - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Maucer;26244593]Where did you take that from. Some speculations say that future versions of taepodong may reach 9000km (with a small gargo) but at the moment thats quite far away. 5.7.2006 NKs taepodong test blew up after 40 seconds 5.4.2009 NK attempted to launch a satellite, but it failed to reach the orbit. It flew 3000km~[/QUOTE] Wikipedia. T'says 4000-6000km, so I said 6000 for dramatic effect.

[QUOTE=Raiskauskone V2;26244719]How can anyone take Japan seriously anymore? Their military is laughably small. [editline]23rd November 2010[/editline] It's same as Sweden threatening to invade Finland if they don't give Åland islands[/QUOTE] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JMSDF[/url] Um, okay

Can't wait for World War 3 to start. Seriously. I don't care that North Korea has only two allies.

[QUOTE=ladiida;26244820]Can't wait for World War 3 to start. Seriously. I don't care that North Korea has only two allies.[/QUOTE] Yeah, I can't wait to die. Gonna be real fun bro. Also, North Korea has no allies, China just gives them shit because their existence is beneficial to them.

NK is funny.

Okay, I'll leave you Scandinavians to self-hate in a corner. [b]Edit:[/b] [quote]1315: The BBC's John Sudworth in Seoul says both sides are blaming each other, although given its record of previous provocations, North Korea will be seen by many neutral international observers as the likely culprit. Many will also wonder what this tells us about the [b]murky internal politics of Pyongyang, in a period of risky transition as Kim Jong-il passes power to his youngest son[/b].[/quote]

Dad just woke me up telling me about this. Told him I already know. Well new shit I guess. ALERT: South Korea warns North Korea there will be "severe punishment" if North Korea continues aggressive measures - Reuters half a minute ago via Tweetie for Mac ALERT: Japan says North Korea's actions Tuesday afternoon "unforgivable," says Tokyo "strongly condemns" attacks. less than 5 seconds ago via Tweetie for Mac edit: dam late. need sleep.

I really, really, really, [B]REALLY[/B] want to see a Kim Jong-il/un sitcom. [editline]23rd November 2010[/editline] Really.

Got in a political debate with my friend, he was discussing WWIII as China will enter the fight if it breaks out because of the new Obama legislations, Russia as it's economy is pretty low and Kim Jung Il old and his son taking over. Me and another friend were pretty much Uh huh :raise:

[QUOTE=Novangel;26244896]Got in a political debate with my friend, he was discussing WWIII as China will enter the fight if it breaks out because of the new Obama legislations, Russia as it's economy is pretty low and Kim Jung Il old and his son taking over. Me and another friend were pretty much Uh huh :raise:[/QUOTE] China may have more troops but they aren't as skilled as America's and Russia's. They'll scramble all over the place and aren't as accurate and well trained.

[QUOTE=Raiskauskone V2;26244804]Your face is stupid and so is your argument Japan's military capability is comparable to sweden's, meaning nonexistand. Incase you don't know, Sweden's military funding has been cut to bare minimum.[/QUOTE] It's not like they need a military

[QUOTE=whiteguyV4;26244801]usa sucks[/QUOTE] Don't start shit bro. Also considering the fact that it was reported last week that NK had advanced nuclear capabilities kinda worries me, especially with the most recent news.

[QUOTE=Erebus.;26244928]Don't start shit bro. Also considering the fact that it was reported last week that NK had advanced nuclear capabilities kinda worries me, especially with the most recent news.[/QUOTE] Don't call me bro, cunt.

[QUOTE=Ultimate7MK;26244919]China may have more troops but they aren't as skilled as America's and Russia's. They'll scramble all over the place and aren't as accurate and well trained.[/QUOTE] And I'm sure China wont be fighting with NK. They only co-operate economically.

Pretty sure Americans have anti-Nuclear systems in place.

[QUOTE=Maucer;26244943]And I'm sure China wont be fighting with NK. They only co-operate economically.[/QUOTE] From what I heard China hates NK and is watching over them so they don't do something stupid since if they do China will charge in and shove their dicks up their asses.

[QUOTE=Novangel;26244947]Pretty sure Americans have anti-Nuclear systems in place.[/QUOTE] Not after the cybernetic space monsters attack. (Source: Baby Vanga)

[QUOTE=whiteguyV4;26244801] [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Spammer" - Jimbomcb))[/highlight][/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE[/media]

[QUOTE=Maucer;26244943]And I'm sure China wont be fighting with NK. They only co-operate economically.[/QUOTE] Not really economic cooperation so much as China giving shit to NK.

China is only allies with NK because they don't want to deal with the south/ american friendly unified korea. China doesn't want to deal with crazy facist states, but its better than the US

[QUOTE=Novangel;26244947]Pretty sure Americans have anti-Nuclear systems in place.[/QUOTE] What anti-nuclear systems?

[QUOTE=Ultimate7MK;26244955]From what I heard China hates NK and is watching over them so they don't do something stupid since if they do China will charge in and shove their dicks up their asses.[/QUOTE] Theres quite a bit of underground weapons trading going on, so no.

[QUOTE=Ultimate7MK;26244919]China may have more troops but they aren't as skilled as America's and Russia's. They'll scramble all over the place and aren't as accurate and well trained.[/QUOTE] Yeah, because one of the strictest government controlled countries in the world, while simultaneously having the largest population, is going to have an army full of untrained kids with knock off AKs... :jerkbag:

[QUOTE=Novangel;26244896]Got in a political debate with my friend, he was discussing WWIII as China will enter the fight if it breaks out because of the new Obama legislations, Russia as it's economy is pretty low and Kim Jung Il old and his son taking over. Me and another friend were pretty much Uh huh :raise:[/QUOTE] Why would China, which sells tons of stuff to the west, even go to the aid of North Korea it'd be incredibly stupid attacking the allies of the nations that are giving them money.

I just read on that twitter: FLASH: U.S. envoy Bosworth says China, U.S. agree that multilateral approach needed to address North Korean nuclear issue :ohdear: Oh god here we go again...

[quote=BBC]1347: Yonhap reports that hours after the incident, North Korea's leader, Kim Jong-il, and his youngest son, Kim Jong-un, toured a soy sauce factory and a medical school in Pyongyang.[/quote] Attack South Korea > Tour soy sauce factory with my best kid. True IRL troll.

[QUOTE=Tobba;26245059]I just read on that twitter FLASH: U.S. envoy Bosworth says China, U.S. agree that multilateral approach needed to address North Korean nuclear issue :ohdear: Oh god here we go again...[/QUOTE] Yep, just saw it too.

[QUOTE=Re-y-tard;26244998]What anti-nuclear systems?[/QUOTE] Like missile intercept systems, shoots any ICBMs or the like down before they reach kill radius.

[QUOTE=Re-y-tard;26244998]What anti-nuclear systems?[/QUOTE] Eject Switzerland into the Nuke's flight path.

[QUOTE=Raiskauskone V2;26244719]How can anyone take Japan seriously anymore? Their military is laughably small. [editline]23rd November 2010[/editline] It's same as Sweden threatening to invade Finland if they don't give Åland islands[/QUOTE] Don't fuck with Japan. They've got fucking space battle ships. [img]http://www.liveforfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/yamato_style_concept.jpg[/img]