Best Korea fires mortars at Worst Korea - Developing Story - Polidicks

[QUOTE=GunFox;26256472]I'm a fan of using rabbits.[/QUOTE] One of Kim's plans to solve hunger was to breed giant rabbits. He'd just claim he bred a LOT of rabbits instead. [QUOTE=Kazumi;26256323]I'm all for putting an end to the North Korean state and the Kim-Jong Dynasty. But not through war.[/QUOTE] What other way can you truly take down such a stubborn and conceited dynasty than show its citizens their gods can bleed?

[QUOTE=GunFox;26256472]I'm a fan of using rabbits. Air drop a stupidly large sum of rabbits into North Korea in order to sabotage their farms. What is North Korea gonna do? Admit that they were crushed by a bunch of bunnies and declare war over it? Release a huge number of predators? Then they are stuck with a bunch of hungry predators once they are done killing the rabbits. Plus North Korea doesn't really have the appropriate connections to obtain a bunch of predators. They could also poison the rabbits, but by the time they figure out what has happened, enough grain will be ruined that North Korea seriously falls into total starvation mode. Then the US could be a dick and step in with their coolface on and be all "U hungry?" and offer to airdrop food relief. Suddenly the Korean population is getting food from crates that are labeled with the American flag and Kim has to come up with a way of maintaining the image of the United States being the big bad guy. Of course none of this would actually work, but I can dream.[/QUOTE] -Snip I'm being mean-

[QUOTE=JDER14;26256418]Most likely a scuffle, if not a very bloody scuffle, between to long time enemies. Hopefully it will not escalate.[/QUOTE] because an idiot who made vague predictions said so!!

I really dont see anything happening from this. Nk loves to kick Sk around all the time because Sk rarely retaliates. You would think that the sinking of the ship would make Sk more angered than this

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cPb45tzgdQ[/media]

[QUOTE=sirpopsalot_;26256592]I really dont see anything happening from this. Nk loves to kick Sk around all the time because Sk rarely retaliates. You would think that the sinking of the ship would make Sk more angered than this[/QUOTE] Probably. NK have artillery that could put 8 million population of Seoul in danger. It's too much of a risk, and SK know that.

[QUOTE=sirpopsalot_;26256592]I really dont see anything happening from this. Nk loves to kick Sk around all the time because Sk rarely retaliates. You would think that the sinking of the ship would make Sk more angered than this[/QUOTE] they are waiting for the US to do all the work for them.

[QUOTE=Kazumi;26256323]I'm all for putting an end to the North Korean state and the Kim-Jong Dynasty. But not through war.[/QUOTE] Because using diplomacy has been so successful so far right.

[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;26256642]Because using diplomacy has been so successful so far right.[/QUOTE] They've engaged in diplomacy in the past 50 years? News to me.

[QUOTE=MrEndangered;26256556]That's the dumbest idea I've ever heard. They're already in a food crisis, and the UN would still ship them food because it'd become a humanitarian crisis. There would be no exodus or collapse of the regime. If anything it would piss alot of countries off. Not to mention damage the local ecology, furthering their propogander campaign. No regime has ever collapsed due to hunger.[/QUOTE] It wasn't a serious suggestion, bud. I was pointing out that there aren't a lot of options other than going war that result in the demise of kim jong's empire. It is a funny mental image though.

[QUOTE=GunFox;26256668]It wasn't a serious suggestion, bud. I was pointing out that there aren't a lot of options other than going war that result in the demise of kim jong's empire.[/QUOTE] I know, but arguing is fun. Still mad at you for Warhol too, but that's just sour grapes... Nyeh.

[QUOTE=GunFox;26256668]It wasn't a serious suggestion, bud. I was pointing out that there aren't a lot of options other than going war that result in the demise of kim jong's empire. It is a funny mental image though.[/QUOTE] its not an empire

[QUOTE=Torfaldur;26256696]its not an empire[/QUOTE] It's basically a monarchy. [editline]23rd November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=MrEndangered;26256667]They've engaged in diplomacy in the past 50 years? News to me.[/QUOTE] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_15th_North-South_Joint_Declaration[/url]

Thread music [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XNFokmDKrE[/media]

[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;26256712]It's basically a monarchy.[/QUOTE] Dictatorship :science:

[QUOTE=Torfaldur;26256696]its not an empire[/QUOTE] Don't take things so literally, you know what he means.

[QUOTE=MrEndangered;26256684]I know, but arguing is fun. Still mad at you for Warhol too, but that's just sour grapes... Nyeh.[/QUOTE] If it makes you feel any better I gave JDK back his original account.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f_0Y8Zh8QY&feature=player_embedded#![/media] Oh shit don't send your mannequins after us oh no!

[QUOTE=MrEndangered;26256556]That's the dumbest idea I've ever heard. They're already in a food crisis, and the UN would still ship them food because it'd become a humanitarian crisis. There would be no exodus or collapse of the regime. If anything it would piss alot of countries off. Not to mention damage the local ecology, furthering their propogander campaign. No regime has ever collapsed due to hunger.[/QUOTE] It's called a joke, unless Gunfox is a highly unorthodox thinker.

[QUOTE=MrEndangered;26256556]That's the dumbest idea I've ever heard. They're already in a food crisis, and the UN would still ship them food because it'd become a humanitarian crisis. There would be no exodus or collapse of the regime. If anything it would piss alot of countries off. Not to mention damage the local ecology, furthering their propogander campaign. No regime has ever collapsed due to hunger.[/QUOTE] I think you need to look up the French Revolution.

[QUOTE=GunFox;26256732]If it makes you feel any better I gave JDK back his original account.[/QUOTE] Hmm... It might. edit: Wait that's not Warhol so no. I shall sulk some more until I am appeased. I am sulking.

[quote=daijitsu]One of Kim's plans to solve hunger was to breed giant rabbits. He'd just claim he bred a LOT of rabbits instead.[/quote] [img]http://sajjadzaidi.com/2007/jan/giant_bunnies_for_breakfast/large_wabbit.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=MrEndangered;26256729]Dictatorship :science:[/QUOTE] Reign is passed along a certain family line. It's a de facto monarchy. A very autocratic monarchy. Under the facade of being "for the people".

[QUOTE=scout1;26256753]I think you need to look up the French Revolution.[/QUOTE] OK maybe one. Or two. But no more than that. So that means I'm still correct.

[QUOTE=MrEndangered;26256859]OK maybe one. Or two. But no more than that. So that means I'm still correct.[/QUOTE] You specifically said "no regime" at all. So you are incorrect.

[QUOTE=MrEndangered;26256859]OK maybe one. Or two. But no more than that.[/QUOTE] I know one or more Roman emperors was affected because they stopped giving out free grain (and performances) in Rome due to its huge cost, but the tradition was so entrenched that they were forced to reinstate it/were killed. Can't say I remember that one clearly, though. Then there's the 1905 Russian revolution...

[QUOTE=daijitsu;26256555] What other way can you truly take down such a stubborn and conceited dynasty than show its citizens their gods can bleed?[/QUOTE] You are probably right. Planting the seed of doubt will eventually grow the mightiest tree. [QUOTE=chunkymonkey;26256642]Because using diplomacy has been so successful so far right.[/QUOTE] I didn't say anything about diplomacy. I find this to be a tough dilemma that can't be solved overnight by a bunch of guys on an internet forum. Except for Gunfox's idea. That was brilliant.

is there a war yet

[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;26256813]Reign is passed along a certain family line. It's a de facto monarchy. A very autocratic monarchy. Under the facade of being "for the people".[/QUOTE] Not necessarily. It's still operated under a single party system, and he's elevated his son as successor because he holds the most influence, as I understand it, it doesn't hold a family tree.

Where's bond when we need him. [b]Edit:[/b] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCSJc0vgy_0&t=10[/media]