Kansas GOP House Speaker ‘Prays’ That Obama’s ‘Children Be Fatherless And His Wife A Widow’ - Polidicks

[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;34203237]The DNC Chair said the reason Gabrielle Giffords and 18 others were shot was because of political rhetoric from the Tea Party.[/QUOTE] It was Palin's website with a target over her head. The Tea Party as a grassroots movement for change is dead anyway. [editline]15th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Ridge;34203589]The shooting was carried out by a left wing extremist. The accusations against the Tea Party was among the stupidest and most ill informed claims made by the DNC, and that says A LOT.[/QUOTE] What? If you could classify him as anything, it would be extreme right wing. He was a sexist anarchist nutjob. Really how on earth could you come to the conclusion he was extreme left wing? [editline]15th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Megafanx13;34203677]He was not a left-wing extremist. He was registered as an independent, shot at Giffords because he believed women should not hold positions of power, and even his best friend said he was neither on the left or the right, but incessantly followed conspiracy theories about a new world order and 9/11 being a plot. Describing the Tuscon shooter as left or right wing would both be incorrect. If anything, he was a misogynist and a conspiracy theorist.[/QUOTE] [quote]In politics, Right, right-wing and rightist generally refer to support for a hierarchical society justified by an appeal to natural law or tradition.[/quote] What's more right wing than only natural law, and so traditional that the state doesn't even exist?

[QUOTE=Contag;34210451]What? If you could classify him as anything, it would be extreme right wing. He was a sexist anarchist nutjob. Really how on earth could you come to the conclusion he was extreme left wing? [editline]15th January 2012[/editline] What's more right wing than only natural law, and so traditional that the state doesn't even exist?[/QUOTE] I didn't come to the conclusion that he was left-wing, but yes I suppose if I had to classify him politically it would be more right than left.

You can't really classify him as far right or far left. Things like extremist anarchism and extremist totalitarianism are where the right and left extremes meet.

[QUOTE=RixxzIV;34207710]"May his children be wandering beggars; may they be driven from their ruined homes. May no one extend kindness to him or take pity on his fatherless children. " Things like this, I don't get. Okay, you don't like this guy, but why should his children have to suffer? They haven't done anything wrong, have they?[/QUOTE] The two daughters have done something wrong, having their father being the President of the U.S. Remember, in most of Congress, logic is not really allowed, and fuck sympathy. Also, support corporations. So for that GOP speaker in Kansas, the two daughters did something wrong, not stopping their parents from going to the White House, and not allowing a Republican being the President.

If I ever became a general or something, I would launch a nuclear strike on the bible belt, send a message over the internet right before so most sane people can get out.

[QUOTE=Regulas021;34203143]Wow, those backwards rednecks, supporting the first amendment like that. What the fuck happened to civility in politics? Well, it's never existed. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sumner#.22Crime_against_Kansas.22_and_attack_by_Brooks[/url] Still, stay classy Republicans.[/QUOTE] A fucking [I]classic![/I]

Wow what a dick.

[QUOTE=ThePinkPanzer;34213686]If I ever became a general or something, I would launch a nuclear strike on the bible belt, send a message over the internet right before so most sane people can get out.[/QUOTE] So you'd kill thousands of innocent people who have done absolutely nothing wrong using the blistering heat of nuclear fire. Wow, you're a great person.

These people make me ashamed to be from kansas

[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;34218505]So you'd kill thousands of innocent people who have done absolutely nothing wrong using the blistering heat of nuclear fire. Wow, you're a great person.[/QUOTE] I think that it's actually a requirement of being a US president. I don't think you can point to any that haven't caused a few thousand deaths of innocent people

[QUOTE=Contag;34219057]I think that it's actually a requirement of being a US president. I don't think you can point to any that haven't caused a few thousand deaths of innocent people[/QUOTE] William Henry Harrison?

[QUOTE=Lambeth;34219655]William Henry Harrison?[/QUOTE] He filled that criterion before entering office

[QUOTE=Ridge;34203589]The shooting was carried out by a left wing extremist. The accusations against the Tea Party was among the stupidest and most ill informed claims made by the DNC, and that says A LOT.[/QUOTE] You say a lot of stupid things, but this is pretty up there.

Prays and wishes death on someone and then probably is against abortion.

Lost it at [QUOTE] “Mrs. YoMama” [/QUOTE]

ME WISH DEATH ON ENEMY, WIN POLITICS. ME MANY GOOD.

[QUOTE=DOG-GY;34210294]um[/QUOTE] That's the worst I could remember, I know it's not as bad and it happens less but it still happens.

[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;34223579]That's the worst I could remember, I know it's not as bad and it happens less but it still happens.[/QUOTE] So you've basically said: "I know they aren't as bad and don't do it as often, but I swear they're just as bad!"

Democrats and Republicans in our government are two different breeds of stupid. Republicans have batshit and out-there ideas. But, there are some ideas that work as long as they aren't coupled with other pieces of their beliefs. Democrats have decent ideas but no balls and little political support (and they haven't done much about it). Their response to poison pen letters and hatred is "well okay :c". They have no bite-back against conservative ideologue aside from parodying their programs occasionally (which accomplishes literally nothing). They haven't put out a politician to provide the definition of "progressive" and "liberal"; as a result you could literally call anyone either of these things and people would believe you. Both people on the political spectrum have developed this scorning, condescending, self-righteous feeling of moral high-ground. The difference is that Democrats [I]are[/I] victims and Republicans [I]pretend[/I] to be victims. And this doesn't make Republicans worse. Oh no. It means that Democrats instead try to play the victim further and fail at it [I]horribly[/I]. As the victims, they don't do [I]anything[/I], or at the very least they do [I]very little[/I] to protect what they stand for in the event that their headstrong opponents scream their lungs out over it. It's exactly what they did to the Affordable Care Act. Instead of standing for the working provisions of the bill, they stood by and allowed it to be butchered into a bill that literally [B][I]nobody[/I][/B] liked. Just my two-cents on the problems with Democratic politicians. Not to say that I'd rather be a Republican. Fuck no.

[QUOTE=ThePinkPanzer;34213686]If I ever became a general or something, I would launch a nuclear strike on the bible belt, send a message over the internet right before so most sane people can get out.[/QUOTE] That's not how generals work lol.

[QUOTE=MrEndangered;34201351]Isn't that pretty much a death threat? You'know, the illegal kind? 'Cause I'm pretty sure an official using those statements in that context is a criminal act.[/QUOTE] It's okay, though, because he is doing it in the 'Name of God'! :suicide:

Prime example of another insane Republican Christian extremist