Its legal for your Facebook friends to show your profile to police - Polidicks

I'm going to Burger King tomorrow and demand they give me a big mac. When they refuse I will handcuff myself to the counter. I will then be arrested for asking for a big mac. As of tomorrow, asking for a big mac will be illegal.

[QUOTE=BusterBluth;37320087]I'm going to Burger King tomorrow and demand they give me a big mac. When they refuse I will handcuff myself to the counter. I will then be arrested for asking for a big mac. As of tomorrow, asking for a big mac will be illegal.[/QUOTE] Ok I'm sorry those fags shoulda just left. Fucking people exercising their rights.

[QUOTE=yawmwen;37320346]Ok I'm sorry those fags shoulda just left. Fucking people exercising their rights.[/QUOTE] I get the exact point you're trying to make. If gay marriage were legal, that wouldn't have happened. Their getting themselves arrested was because of the fact that it's not legal, which means they got arrested for trying to get a marriage license, not because they got themselves arrested. Thing is I think you're applying the wrong kind of logic to this. True, in a sense, you're right, but that would be more applicable to, say, an argument in favor of gay rights. This is an argument about crimes in general. To be honest, if you're still talking about victimless crimes, I don't even get what your point is. Unless of course I have no clue what I'm talking about and am following this argument completely wrong, then just ignore me.

[QUOTE=yawmwen;37320346]Ok I'm sorry those fags shoulda just left. Fucking people exercising their rights.[/QUOTE] You are amazing. I really dont know what to say.

[QUOTE=x_xPwntx_x;37320447]I get the exact point you're trying to make. If gay marriage were legal, that wouldn't have happened. Their getting themselves arrested was because of the fact that it's not legal, which means they got arrested for trying to get a marriage license, not because they got themselves arrested. Thing is I think you're applying the wrong kind of logic to this. True, in a sense, you're right, but that would be more applicable to, say, an argument in favor of gay rights. This is an argument about crimes in general. To be honest, if you're still talking about victimless crimes, I don't even get what your point is. Unless of course I have no clue what I'm talking about and am following this argument completely wrong, then just ignore me.[/QUOTE] I'm saying that nobody was hurt by this. This wasn't some crime where anyone was hurt. Someone might have been inconvenienced, but only because two people were being denied human rights. [editline]20th August 2012[/editline] It's a victimless crime.

Damn, I should rat out my "friends" who posted their weed needles on Facebook right now!

[QUOTE=yawmwen;37320489]I'm saying that nobody was hurt by this. This wasn't some crime where anyone was hurt. Someone might have been inconvenienced, but only because two people were being denied human rights. [editline]20th August 2012[/editline] It's a victimless crime.[/QUOTE] Their crime wasn't fucking asking for a marriage license, it was for handcuffing themselves and blocking people and refusing to leave Jesus fucking christ

[QUOTE=yawmwen;37320074]In other words, for being gay. [editline]20th August 2012[/editline] And trying to get a marriage license.[/QUOTE] [h2] NO[/h2] Thats not it. They would have been arrested for trespassing. (THE OFFICIAL CHARGE.) not because they were gay, nor trying to get a license. I would imagine that if you were black you would play the race card so much [editline]20th August 2012[/editline] or disturbing the peace, or disorderly conduct (depends on how the officer wants to charge them)

[QUOTE=yawmwen;37320489]I'm saying that nobody was hurt by this. This wasn't some crime where anyone was hurt. Someone might have been inconvenienced, but only because two people were being denied human rights. [editline]20th August 2012[/editline] It's a victimless crime.[/QUOTE] If it's a victimless crime then let's just focus on that for a second. They handcuffed themselves and were blocking people. An "inconvenience" is still creating victims. There's the offenders - the people doing this knowing full well what's going to happen - and the victims. Sure, they were protesting in a sense, but that's not how you go about doing it. There are protesting laws for a reason.

You're a fucking retard if you upload pictures of your crime on Facebook. Reminds me of all the kids who post pictures of themselves getting maggot on Facebook.

Wow, sure are some scratched records these 2 pages.

why are we talking about gay people

[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37319311]you bought from a dealer who got his stuff from a supplier who got his stuff from a cartel who did this [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War#U.S._death_toll_and_national_security[/url] and countless other atrocities[/QUOTE] If it were from a dealer, then fair enough. But say I grew it myself, what then?