• Anonymous defaces Westboro site during live interview
    166 replies, posted
Does anyone have an image of the message Anon posted on their website? It's down now and I want to see what it says.
[QUOTE=Ven Kaeo;28259975]Does anyone have an image of the message Anon posted on their website? It's down now and I want to see what it says.[/QUOTE] Yes, BrQ posted a link a few posts above: [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1063225-Anonymous-defaces-Westboro-site-during-live-interview?p=28259696&viewfull=1#post28259696[/url]
Glorious.
flawless victory
[QUOTE=Johnnsen;28260005]Yes, BrQ posted a link a few posts above: [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1063225-Anonymous-defaces-Westboro-site-during-live-interview?p=28259696&viewfull=1#post28259696[/url][/QUOTE] Oh. I missed it since it was embedded. Thanks
defacing a website sure taught WBC a lesson. i hear they might disband because of the horror..
"All of your websites are down..that'snotusbytheway." This guy is great
I wish the Anonymous member would disguise his voice in a deep, menacing monotone truly living up to the 'Anonymous' name. I wish I could have a discussion with a WBC member. Challenge their understanding of Christianity with my own understanding. Not that it would do any good.
It has begun, the Lols have. [editline]24th February 2011[/editline] Think about it, WBC is gonna keep Raging and Anon is gonna keep loling and trolling them until there's nothing left
[QUOTE=-Ben_Wolfe-;28261429]I wish the Anonymous member would disguise his voice in a deep, menacing monotone truly living up to the 'Anonymous' name. I wish I could have a discussion with a WBC member. Challenge their understanding of Christianity with my own understanding. Not that it would do any good.[/QUOTE] god how I wish this was true. It would be awesome.
That woman say they are immature? LOL
[QUOTE=Nohj;28261642]god how I wish this was true. It would be awesome.[/QUOTE] I had this voice mind. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ[/media]
Anon there is so full of Memes and snappy comebacks. Its awesome. [editline]24th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=goon165;28261694]I had this voice mind. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ[/media][/QUOTE] thats even better
She seems like such a rancid cunt.
Her smile is obviously forced. It's the "Don't show them we're hurt" kind of smile.
WBC "LOL U CAN'T DOO NOTHING TO US" Anon "lol yeah we can."
They should have at least mentioned how the "church" is just a front for suing people. Looks like they exploited a PHP proxy script installed on the server to access the local network. The idiots must have failed to password protect connections originating from the local network.
Wow. 56 seconds in, and I already want to punch that bitch in her stupid smiling face. That's some quality trolling. It would have been better if anon had actually acted more threatening. Put his voice through a "voice of legion" filter, for instance. Or been more dramatic with the reveal, or acted more condescending.
[QUOTE=Ridge;28259137]Anonymous is like the vigilante that nobody really cares to stop, because they like the results.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/TYCvP.jpg[/IMG]
i bet she smiles because she hates herself internally
[img]http://api.browsershots.org/png/original/d1/d182f4c25d5ef3a56a25d48eee29e932.png[/img]
And people thought they were just gonna ddos their site.
over 9000 sins lol
So wait, if this guy says that the initial threat was not work of anon, does it mean that there's actually an established structure that can track every member of itself and check if they sent it? Does this mean that anon is not just a disorganized bunch of people scattered around the planet?
[QUOTE=lexus04;28263586]So wait, if this guy says that the initial threat was not work of anon, does it mean that there's actually an established structure that can track every member of itself and check if they sent it? Does this mean that anon is not just a disorganized bunch of people scattered around the planet?[/QUOTE] More likely, he checked the chat logs on their anonymous IRC or whatever, and noticed that nobody was saying "hey gaiz imma go troll WBC, u in?"
[QUOTE=lexus04;28263586]So wait, if this guy says that the initial threat was not work of anon, does it mean that there's actually an established structure that can track every member of itself and check if they sent it? Does this mean that anon is not just a disorganized bunch of people scattered around the planet?[/QUOTE] He explains briefly in the video, none of the usual people who write press releases (Who I assume do it when the 'group' has a general consensus on something) had done it.
I literally see WBC members as lower forms of life. Atleast primitive ones.
[QUOTE=-Ben_Wolfe-;28261429]I wish the Anonymous member would disguise his voice in a deep, menacing monotone truly living up to the 'Anonymous' name.[/QUOTE] pointless gimmick one of anon's major arguments was that they were being more civil than the wbc, disguising the voice to make it sound more intimidating would run contrary to that [editline]24th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=lexus04;28263586]So wait, if this guy says that the initial threat was not work of anon, does it mean that there's actually an established structure that can track every member of itself and check if they sent it? Does this mean that anon is not just a disorganized bunch of people scattered around the planet?[/QUOTE] from what I've seen there seems to be a loose elite unofficially organising the whole thing, but other people are free to join if they want. [editline]24th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=lexus04;28263586]So wait, if this guy says that the initial threat was not work of anon, does it mean that there's actually an established structure that can track every member of itself and check if they sent it? Does this mean that anon is not just a disorganized bunch of people scattered around the planet?[/QUOTE] from what I've seen there seems to be a loose elite unofficially organising the whole thing, but other people are free to join if they want.
Hehe, I admit, that's pretty cool. Stay classy anon.
[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;28264325]pointless gimmick one of anon's major arguments was that they were being more civil than the wbc, disguising the voice to make it sound more intimidating would run contrary to that [editline]24th February 2011[/editline] from what I've seen there seems to be a loose elite unofficially organising the whole thing, but other people are free to join if they want. [editline]24th February 2011[/editline] from what I've seen there seems to be a loose elite unofficially organising the whole thing, but other people are free to join if they want.[/QUOTE] He still should've done something. Maybe the "casually dangerous" act - acting amicable but a bit formal, like he was mildly amused by her antics, and then going all "we did it thirty-five minutes ago" whn it came time to fuck her shit up.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.